If you want to pre-screen or pre-date, which is beyond me, then you won't take a person to dinner. To me dinner implies a date, which impiles whoever is asking is paying. If a dude would want to screen me, then we should meet at Starbucks. When I was out dating, I always suggested Starbucks, and it worked out pretty well. Some guys ask me to dinner after the Starbucks encounter some didn't, oh well. I have had 30 minuter Starbucks meetings and 3 hour Starbucks meeting. Plus Starbucks was safe because there was always people there.It could also mean that he is attracted to you and wants to spend some time with you to see if you "fit the bill" (no pun intended), and does not want to invest too much of his money initially to find this out...if in the end he feels your worth it he will either offer to pay or ask you out on a real date....yeah, maybe thats it... since he's not offering this would be considered a "screening" or "pre-date" to weed out the woman that does not measure up. Imagine, if a guy were to take every woman he had some interest in to dinner, he would be broke!......P.S. this is only my opinion, and doesnt mean I agree with this kind of thinking/strategy..Lol
No, the better question is what do we expect? I firmly believe at the end of the day ALL women want a support system and a foundation. You're looking for a partner. Whether he makes the money or you make the money, at the end of the day you're looking for someone to let you know they've got your back, that they are going to do everything in their power to make sure that you only fall so far. Even the extreme "I don't need a man" types deep down use that as a defense mechanism for the realization that few men are going to meet their standards and even fewer men are going to try.And really what do these men want??? If you let a man "be a man" and pay for a meal or 2 youre a gold digger. But then on the other hand if you pick up the tab everytime for you and/or him then you wont let a man "be a man" and you too independent. WTH do they want????
Sorry, but that's kinda gross. I'm not for sale, I don't hand out my goodies in exchange for a meal. And I don't expect people to pay for me just because I'm a woman.
A date is when two people that are romantically interested in each other go out. If they both want to be there, then neither one should have a problem paying for their own food.
Hmmm. That is a very *transactional* view of female sexuality.All it takes is a bored and very pretty looking woman wandering at a bar, and voila! There's someone to pay her half and take her home. I know if I decided to wear make up, stylish clothes, excellent hair and heels for a man, either he's paying or someone else will.
Do guys like this not know how weak and indecisive it makes them look when they don't want to pay? Do they know how much sex and woman their missing out on because there are plenty of men that will?
SHE was the one who asked him out.While I get that dude is a Uni student - he shouldn't be suggesting dinner if he can't afford to pay for 2.
Won't pay? HAHA...I can't even imagine that. What'd he do when the bill came? Just sit there and look at his date like "what??"?? Pretend like he didn't notice that the bill has come?? Get up and walk to the bathroom and wait for his date outside?
If a man won't pay for a romantic date, it says he has no pride as a man.
I'm tired of men acting like paying on a date is an option "maybe I will, maybe I won't". We need to be raising our sons to believe that paying for a date, especially in the beginning, is PART OF DATING. It's not an option. If its a date, its what you do. If a woman offers to pay or suggests paying, that's a bonus, but it is not to be expected nor assumed.
^They want whatever is convenient for them at the time.
I don't split a check with my boyfriend, nope, but I will pick him up a shirt or a book. He wouldn't dream of it. I have written in a previous threads about how my SO feels about that. We have found a nice balance that works for us.
Now my exhusband, he would look at the check and I got sick of it and I picked it up and paid. Even though we were married and our money was our money it still didn't sit right me and towards the end he even had the nerve to say that I never let him be a man. Whateva's cleva fool.
In all seriousness, I think who every ask is the person who should pay. That is why ladies shouldn't ask guy's out, because if the relationship is started like that, then that will be the dynamic and it will be hard to break.
Another thing that I wonder is how is this worked out in the dynamic's of a homosexual relationship?
Listen: men are always supposed to pay for everything always all the time forever for everything always. Women are supposed to smile and wear skirts, dammit, skirts!
Also, college students' only options for eating/dates are: pizza, Chinese food, coffee, and McDonald's. That.is.allllll.
No, but really. Imo, it depends on the situation and that blurb didn't give enough information for me.
(I'm seriously about to go order some Chinese food though )
I dunno how I missed the fact that SHE asked HIM out. :::getting off the soapbox:::
If he asked her out he should treat on the first date so he should pick something he can afford. Subsequent dates are up for negotiation in my opinion.
I was just listening to this thing on NPR on dating last week and two or three guys (who sounded white) called in to complain about how women have unrealistic expectations about men paying all the time. Not only did women want men to pay, they also only wanted to go to the finest restaurants. SMH. I'm sure tons of women miss out on great guys by demanding that they empty their wallets for the honor of spending time with them.
RoxyScores
Okay just b/c I'm really curious and I have to ask.
Do you feel that stripping, in a way, kind of puts your body up for sale? Cuz your stance on this is really strong. I'm not trying to be snarky, I know you're studying in the area of Women's Studies so I really want to hear your opinion.
It says he should go directly to "Friend-Zone", do not pass Go, do not collect the vajayjay.
I can't get with this new age dating. Yall can have it. Even my platonic never touched me male friends pay the ticket just because that's what men are expected to do.
If you want to pre-screen or pre-date, which is beyond me, then you won't take a person to dinner. To me dinner implies a date, which impiles whoever is asking is paying. If a dude would want to screen me, then we should meet at Starbucks. When I was out dating, I always suggested Starbucks, and it worked out pretty well. Some guys ask me to dinner after the Starbucks encounter some didn't, oh well. I have had 30 minuter Starbucks meetings and 3 hour Starbucks meeting. Plus Starbucks was safe because there was always people there.
Also age has a lot to do with it. Ok, a 20 yo, college student may not be able to spring for a dinner date unless it is at McDonalds, but he should be able to take you to get some Rita's then sit in the park and feed the ducks. I am thinking of things from my POV, a nearly 40 something yo, who has a little sumptin sumptin going on. I wish a ninja would ASK ME OUT then expect me to pay.
No, I don't feel like I'm putting my self up for sale. Yes, I'm using my body to provide a service, but that's no different than a hairdresser using their hands to cut hair. The only reason why people would call it "selling your body" is because they have weird guilt/shame issues about their own naked body.
At my job I'm not trading real sexual favors, I'm flirting and dancing while naked. Like any job, it's well understood that customers have to pay us for our time. But in my real life, I have genuine relationships. I demand equal treatment and refuse to take a submissive role in relationships. I'm not trying to get anything out of men because I'm more than able to take care of myself. It's f*cked up that women are mainly valued for their youth and beauty and I won't use my femine wiles to take advantage of men in my real life. I'll only use them fairly, in the club where men know what to expect.
I enjoy subverting gender roles and get a kick out of switching between femme/submissive and masculine/dominant at work. I think my job's made me a better feminist. I've spent so much time with men, experienced patriarchy firsthand. I've seen them be ugly, controlling and competitive. But also I've seen men at their most vulnerable, have gotten paid to hold them while they cry and listen to their secrets. I have a much better understanding of masculinty now.
A man should not have to pay for my meal just because I dressed up and gave him nice conversation. You may as well sell yourselves as far as I'm concerned. If you dress up, you should do it for you first, and if dude appreciates it, then great, but acting like he owes you something because you dressed up is just plain wrong. And if you cant be polite during a date without expecting someone to pay your way, then you shouldn't be dating at all. I'm sorry to say, that I'm really disappointed that this is how you really think. SMDHOtherwise we can hang out, and I'll be in a jeans, sneakers, ponytail, and a college sweatshirt. I'll listen to only what I'm interested in, text freely during the "hang out", and ditch him when I feel like it. That's the true beauty of going dutch, your not obligated to look good, look interested, or stick around. But if a guy decides to formally ask me out, and I spend days trying to look perfect, I will be PISSED if he asked me to pay. Men aren't paying for sex, their paying for my time. Their paying for an opportunity to see me at my best, my most beautiful, charismatic, etc.
Let's be honest, going dutch is not a modern relationship. A modern relationship is this. Adding a guy on FB. Your first date, is a nightly chat session. You also, browse his pictures and his friends to know if you like him. Then you really get intimate and Skype each other. Then you're texting at all hours. And then you sext each other. Finally, he changes his status on FB to in a relationship with you!
My responses are in red.Wow, some of yall.....So if a dude has no money, he shouldn't date? This is crazy. Lack of money should not preculde a man from being datable. Dude is in university, it's not like he's a janitor with no prospects. He's a poor student and is not in the position to afford to pay for someone elses meal. No wonder men see us as gold diggers with attitudes like some ive seen on this board. As a person who was single for damn near 5 years, I always insisted on paying my way. I don't see why a dude should pick up the tab esp as I know I'm not going to see him again and I am a working woman. I want to be able to leave the date and happily ignore your calls without dude feeling like I owe him something.
I'm not saying he souldn't date but his imagination should be working overtime. I had broke bfs in college and we always dated. We would go to free stuff at school and in the community. Sometimes we would go to a restuarant and split a sampler platter but being broke isn't an excuse not to treat a girl.
And how does having a man pay for dinner makes you a gold digger? Trust, these SAME men who refuses to pay have no problem, I mean no problem sleeping with that same chick.
I can get a female co worker to treat me to a meal. Hell, a meal at Applebee's is $20. I've given that to panhandlers. I'm worth a damn meal, sorry.
A man should not have to pay for my meal just because I dressed up and gave him nice conversation. You may as well sell yourselves as far as I'm concerned. If you dress up, you should do it for you first, and if dude appreciates it, then great, but acting like he owes you something because you dressed up is just plain wrong. And if you cant be polite during a date without expecting someone to pay your way, then you shouldn't be dating at all. I'm sorry to say, that I'm really disappointed that this is how you really think. SMDH
Wow, some of yall.....So if a dude has no money, he shouldn't date? This is crazy. Lack of money should not preculde a man from being datable. Dude is in university, it's not like he's a janitor with no prospects. He's a poor student and is not in the position to afford to pay for someone elses meal. No wonder men see us as gold diggers with attitudes like some ive seen on this board. As a person who was single for damn near 5 years, I always insisted on paying my way. I don't see why a dude should pick up the tab esp as I know I'm not going to see him again and I am a working woman. I want to be able to leave the date and happily ignore your calls without dude feeling like I owe him something.
A man should not have to pay for my meal just because I dressed up and gave him nice conversation. You may as well sell yourselves as far as I'm concerned. If you dress up, you should do it for you first, and if dude appreciates it, then great, but acting like he owes you something because you dressed up is just plain wrong. And if you cant be polite during a date without expecting someone to pay your way, then you shouldn't be dating at all. I'm sorry to say, that I'm really disappointed that this is how you really think. SMDH
If you start out paying half you will have to keep it up.
I don't mind treating my boyfriend OCCASIONALLY but he best never get reliant.....and he doesn't because i never so much as looked at my purse on any of our first dates.