intellectualuva
Well-Known Member
How can someone who can barely afford to retire insist his wife retire with him. Are they planning on strategic homelessness or something? I don't get it.
How can someone who can barely afford to retire insist his wife retire with him. Are they planning on strategic homelessness or something? I don't get it.
another case:
Dear Pete,
I’m worried about what will happen to my retirement income when my husband dies. I’m 52 years old, and he’s 62. He’s made much more money than me for years, and I personally don’t have many assets. He plans on retiring sometime in the next year, and he wants me to retire too. We won’t have a pension, and he barely has enough to retire, but he’s going to do it anyway. This works fine until he dies, because he doesn’t have life insurance and he says he’s leaving some of his accounts to his adult children. What should I do?
Marie
Scottsdale, Arizona
This is a problem. Not a "cross this 't' and dot that 'i' problem" but a very big problem. Retirement planning is difficult enough when both people in a marriage are the same age, but when there's a sizeable age gap the problem gets especially complicated.
Statistically speaking, you will likely outlive your husband. And based on your age difference, you may be without him for well over a decade.
In a perfect world, you take your concern to your husband, he calls his life insurance agent and buys a giant life insurance policy on himself that will help create an income stream for you at his death.
But I’ve done this long enough to know if that was in his wheelhouse of prudence, he would have already done it. Besides, the premiums for the policy would likely be cost-prohibitive at this point, especially if he’s barely able to retire.
The last thing you need is a pep talk from me about the importance of a woman taking control of her finances and sticking up for herself, but you’re about to get just that.
As much as you want to spend time together in an idyllic retirement, I highly recommend turning your focus to building your own financial plan. This plan means you need to keep working and make financial decisions based on your own personal retirement readiness. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this.
If you don’t take control of this situation, you will undoubtedly find yourself living a financial nightmare. Without proper planning, any person in a committed relationship would suffer the same fate.https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...curity-building-income-key-widows/4678184002/
My state only gives a second wife 1/3 of the estate if there are children with a previous partner. I know a woman in her late sixties who was given a 30 day eviction notice by her step kids because they owned 2/3 of the house that she was living in and wanted her out. She couldn’t afford to buy them out and her retirement income wouldn’t even cover the rent on a nice apartment. Her husband never updated his life insurance policies or other accounts to include her, so those things went to the kids as well.
The kids could’ve been kinder to their stepmother, but I see no reason that a second wife should expect to get a bigger portion of the estate than the children.
That's horrible. How long had they been married? The relationship must have been pretty bad for the kids to evict a woman in her late 60s. Perhaps they didn't know her financial situation?
My state only gives a second wife 1/3 of the estate if there are children with a previous partner. I know a woman in her late sixties who was given a 30 day eviction notice by her step kids because they owned 2/3 of the house that she was living in and wanted her out. She couldn’t afford to buy them out and her retirement income wouldn’t even cover the rent on a nice apartment. Her husband never updated his life insurance policies or other accounts to include her, so those things went to the kids as well.
The kids could’ve been kinder to their stepmother, but I see no reason that a second wife should expect to get a bigger portion of the estate than the children.
I think they’d been married 10 years or so. But the house was paid for during the first marriage and it was the home they were raised in. They wanted stepmother to get out of their mother’s house.That's horrible. How long had they been married? The relationship must have been pretty bad for the kids to evict a woman in her late 60s. Perhaps they didn't know her financial situation?
I think they’d been married 10 years or so. But the house was paid for during the first marriage and it was the home they were raised in. They wanted stepmother to get out of their mother’s house.
Prolly need to go ahead and divorce. He’s irresponsible and wants her to be the same way.How can someone who can barely afford to retire insist his wife retire with him. Are they planning on strategic homelessness or something? I don't get it.
Prolly need to go ahead and divorce. He’s irresponsible and wants her to be the same way.
I get them feeling some kind of way but if mom didn’t get it in the divorce then why are they holding grudges against the step mom. Sounds like their beef should’ve been with dad.I think they’d been married 10 years or so. But the house was paid for during the first marriage and it was the home they were raised in. They wanted stepmother to get out of their mother’s house.
The mom passed away during the marriage. I don’t know if they were mad at the stepmom or not. It seemed like they just weren’t trying to let her keep the family home.I get them feeling some kind of way but if mom didn’t get it in the divorce then why are they holding grudges against the step mom. Sounds like their beef should’ve been with dad.
I get them feeling some kind of way but if mom didn’t get it in the divorce then why are they holding grudges against the step mom. Sounds like their beef should’ve been with dad.
I had a friend in college who married a man in his 60’s when she was in her 20’s. He had money though. But he turned out to be a bastid. This thread reminds me of him. He intended to leave nothing for her. He told her so too. Everything was going to his kids from his previous marriage. Hence the reason she became a nurse and quit being his stay at home wife.
I had a friend in college who married a man in his 60’s when she was in her 20’s. He had money though. But he turned out to be a bastid. This thread reminds me of him. He intended to leave nothing for her. He told her so too. Everything was going to his kids from his previous marriage. Hence the reason she became a nurse and quit being his stay at home wife.
I'm assuming he told her this after they got married? I don't fault his choice to make sure his kids are ok in the event of his passing, but he could leave her something. Good for her for taking charge of her life and making sure that she will be ok no matter what he does.
I don’t understand. Was she going to gain anything from the marriage process? Papers or something?
Did he at least pay for her school? I hope so, and then left him after she got a job.