Well let's put it in perspective...how old are these guys? Upscale is relative and I would believe age, exposure and experience would play a part in what a person calls upscale. Olive Garden is lunch worthy and basic dinner worthy. Upscale................Morton's, Ruth Chris, Cinghiale's (love this place)............those are getting to the upscale route to me.
I wouldn't order it on a first date even if I was craving it.
Why not, Cover?
Now I'm normally in 'get it how you live' mode, but I find this a little.....unseemly. I asked why doesn't she just get what she wants and her response is alway 'well what's wrong with ordering lobster'?
So umm yeah, poll question - Would you order lobster on the first date just cuz it's 'free'?
Me and a friend had an etiquette disagreement.
She's been doing the online dating thing and attractive woman that she is, she's met quite a few men who have asked her out to dinner to become better acquainted.
When she'd tell me about the dates, with very few exceptions she'd mention how the lobster was. Come to find out, if there's a lobster dish on the menu in appetizer, entree or dessert form - she's ordering some. Now here's the catch - I don't think she even likes lobster. I been knowing her for 16 years (lived with her 2 of those years) and haven't ever seen her eat seafood.
Now I'm normally in 'get it how you live' mode, but I find this a little.....unseemly. I asked why doesn't she just get what she wants and her response is alway 'well what's wrong with ordering lobster'?
So umm yeah, poll question - Would you order lobster on the first date just cuz it's 'free'?
I agree with MizzBrown and you, JC. It's one thing if you've been craving lobster for weeks and you decide to order it. But it's another to order it just because you can...or to test a man. I agree that it's unseemly because it suggests that the woman is too broke to get it herself or that she's not used to being taken to nice places. When you have access to something often, you don't have to cash in on a man offering something to you.
if i'm in the mood, i order it.
if he's short, i pay for my meal.
i never go to a restaurant without backup dough unless i'm in a committed relationship and i know he's got me.
besides, i'm too old for games.
if he takes me to a restaurant that offers lobster - the real deal and not those skimy red lobster kind - i mean, aged, large, take up half the plate, lobster that cost $50+ per lobster, al la carte, more likely than not, the cost of the meals across the board is going to be $$$$.
do i automatically assume i cannot have lobster just because it's supposedly represents the most expensive thing on the menu? no.
if a man takes me to any restaurant, i will assume that he can afford to pay for anything on the menu since he chose said restaurant. if he can't i would expect him to speak up.
any man with common sense should wonder if the woman may want "lobster" and if he thinks she will order it and cannot afford it, he needs to pick a different restaurant.
Thats exactly what I was thinking [/b]
There is nothing wrong with eating lobster, if you enjoy it, and if he has taken you to a place that actually has it on the menu. However, her intentions are immature. For me, the objective of a first date is to enjoy myself and get to know this guy, not to TEST him, because that is when the unneccessary, shallow, pointless games start.
I love seafood so for me it is not a big deal to order it. But I do not think I would order anything that messy on the first few dates. In the beginning, I am in the "too cute" mode, preserving my sexy in every way. Cracking lobster shells does not fit into that look.
(However, if its a yummy pasta dish with cooked lobster in it....then maybe, but again, I actually like lobster. I would not order it just for show.).