asubeauty
Well-Known Member
My SO had a wonderful idea for us to go dutch when we go out. I pay for myself, he pays for his own. He thinks it'll make our relationship stronger.
I told him that I think it cheapens our relationship. (Literally and figuratively) That's what you do with someone you just met, or a platonic friend, not your GIRLFRIEND.
It's been stressful for us because we are both having problems with money. Around Christmas I didn't have enough money to pay bills. I was calling creditors and my landlord trying to make deals so that I didn't have utilities turned off or get evicted. The only thing that saved me was my apt getting flooded and the insurance check. I still haven't been able to replace things in my apt because I had to catch up on bills. I don't have any furniture in here right now.
And he just got done traveling the country interviewing for residencies which took a huge chunk out of his pockets too. I can understand that times are hard, but to just announce that I have to pay for myself and if you help me out, I need to pay you back? To me that was like saying, "We aren't that close anymore." If you can't afford to go out, it's not a big deal to me, I don't need to go out. Most of the time we cook for each other anyway, so I don't understand why he had to announce that we need to fend for ourselves. erplexed
When I complained about it, he said that it was only until he gets on his feet again financially. Was I wrong in thinking that his making a point of saying that he wasn't going to pay for anything for me was a little bit insensitive? I really feel as if he's trying to make a point about our relationship. He didn't word it like, "I'm struggling financially right now, we might not be able to go out a lot." It was more like, "From now on, we each pay for each other when we go out. If I help you, you can pay me back and I'll pay you back. That's the way it's going to be, I'm putting my foot down!"
I told him that I think it cheapens our relationship. (Literally and figuratively) That's what you do with someone you just met, or a platonic friend, not your GIRLFRIEND.
It's been stressful for us because we are both having problems with money. Around Christmas I didn't have enough money to pay bills. I was calling creditors and my landlord trying to make deals so that I didn't have utilities turned off or get evicted. The only thing that saved me was my apt getting flooded and the insurance check. I still haven't been able to replace things in my apt because I had to catch up on bills. I don't have any furniture in here right now.
And he just got done traveling the country interviewing for residencies which took a huge chunk out of his pockets too. I can understand that times are hard, but to just announce that I have to pay for myself and if you help me out, I need to pay you back? To me that was like saying, "We aren't that close anymore." If you can't afford to go out, it's not a big deal to me, I don't need to go out. Most of the time we cook for each other anyway, so I don't understand why he had to announce that we need to fend for ourselves. erplexed
When I complained about it, he said that it was only until he gets on his feet again financially. Was I wrong in thinking that his making a point of saying that he wasn't going to pay for anything for me was a little bit insensitive? I really feel as if he's trying to make a point about our relationship. He didn't word it like, "I'm struggling financially right now, we might not be able to go out a lot." It was more like, "From now on, we each pay for each other when we go out. If I help you, you can pay me back and I'll pay you back. That's the way it's going to be, I'm putting my foot down!"