*Delete*
I do think that there are many women like me who wouldn't mind dating a man who makes a lot less than them, but are turned off to it for several reasons - 1) they're scared as hell of being the breadwinner by a significant amount because of all the "what ifs" 2) they fear that so many men would feel emasculated by it and that it would cause issues 3) guys wouldn't want to help around the house, thus doubling the woman's workload. #3 is really the dealbreaker for me right there - if I am busting my a$$ at work to provide for our family, you'd BETTER NOT be expecting me to make everyone a home cooked meal and do laundry if I've been working for 10 to 12 hours a day! Yet, many women who outearn their husbands are finding themselves in that exact situation (except, most folks don't work the insane hours I do...LOL!)
.
girl, we share a brain! I swear I was thinking the exact same thing!Wow! I think the saddest part of this is that the main message that isn't getting discussed enough in this thread is that the brother just wasn't that into OP.
He knew about her through friends and was probably really interested in seeing her in person after hearing about her.
However, when he finally got to have a conversation with her, he felt the need to "test" her. There aren't too many certainties in life but this always holds true, when a man wants a woman, he goes after her hard. He does whatever he can to seem more attractive to her, usually this involves bragging about his occupation and his bank account.
This guy was most likely somewhat attracted to OP, but after getting a sense of her attitude, he decided not to go full throttle and play some BS game to see if she was as materialistic as she was coming across either through actions, dress, etc. And just the fact that he pulled this prank shows that he had no true interest in OP at that point, since you can never make a woman really forgive you for lying to her or playing mind games.
OP may be successful, intelligent and attractive in her opinion, but she has no idea what characteristics he values in a mate and that's all that matters in this case. As a general rule of thumb, when a woman declares her career or educational achievement as the first trait about her, then she probably carries that cockiness in her day-to-day speech as well and that's not really that attractive to most men. Men want a good-looking woman who will be a good wife, meaning she should be supportive, compassionate, caring, loving, humble and able to respect her man in actions and words. A high-achieving guy does not need someone who is acting as more of a competitor instead of a supporter to his life's goals.
I think that OP should consider how she comes across to men to prevent any of them finding her to be less than sincere or superficial. It seems like she liked this guy alot now that she knows his earning potential (at least enough to warrant time creating a whole thread about this dude).
And it hurts me a bit to think of how her face and body language must have changed when he said he was a security guard. People never think about their body language and that's what confirmed to him that she was definitely not worth his time. Did she look startled when he said security guard, did she look away from him, turn her body away, look down at her wine glass, did she let an uncomfortable silence grow, did her eyes get big, did her face read a big "all hell naw, you're a rent a cop" albeit subconsciously? The sad thing is that she must have done something earlier to cause him to feel like she deserved such a silly test. If he had truly liked OP, he never would have played a game and he would have made several attempts to get her number and email address.
The sum of a man's value is not tied to his career or bank account. I think we all can agree that a man's character is his most important trait. His ability to provide should be second or lower on the list of desired traits in a mate. The man must have been attractive, polite, intelligent-sounding, etc and that's why OP carried on a convo with him, but when he said he was a security guard (despite the fact that he was already no longer interested in her IMHO), she could have saved face by picking up on his attire and his vocabulary, she should have used deductive reasoning and determined if he really "seemed" like a regular ol' security officer. Something tells me he was dressed nicely (i.e. designer clothes, semi-expensive watch, top-notch blackberry), had a decent vocabulary and had conversation that gave evidence of his educational status. She should have asked him where he worked and how he came to know her (I'm assuming) high-achieving friends, where he went to school, what his plans were and never let her face show disappointment.
It's ok not to want to marry a broke man, but it's not right to think of/treat someone differently because of their chosen careers. The man may not be right for you because of his salary, but he is still a man and deserving of respect.
So as someone pointed out earlier, too many BW are sloppy "gold-diggers". All you have to do is ask yourself what does your ideal guy want in a wife and be that. If you answer that question seriously, you'll learn to change the way you present yourself to men. It's great if you're like me and have a wonderful career and the highest degree in the land, but you probably will be single in your 40s if you make each prospect address you by your full title.
Think about it, when a guy asks you to describe yourself, do you start with "I'm a lawyer. I work at F.U. & Lebowski on 5th. I went to Spelman, graduated with top honors. I went to Emory for my JD, etc". Most people don't want your resume on a date or at a casual setting. You are hopefully more than your job and so is that guy, so try to be more engaging, "Oh, let's see, I love to travel. In fact, I just got back from a weekend trip in Baja California, and then I went to LA to catch up with some friends from undergrad. I grew up in Decatur, GA and went to my mom's alma mater, Spelman. While there I volunteered for a woman's shelter and got interested in criminal law. The director at the center wrote this wonderful recommendation letter for my law school applications and through the grace of God and the deans at Emory, I now have my JD. I loved living in ATL, but I leapt at the chance to work a block away from the original Sak's Fifth and Macy's, so that's why I was floored when Lebowski called me up for an interview! Enough about me, tell me more about you!"
And from there you have given the same information about how fabulously smart and high-achieving you are, but it's a heck of a lot more interesting and compassionate sounding. It gives your life story texture and it invites a host of questions and opportunity for the guy to find similarities with you. This is the way I roll. I give a dose of compassionate stuff, then I talk about career goals I have met all the while articulating that I am a great all-the-way around potential wife and have a life outside of my job.
He's smiling because he remembers that you failed his lil' test and he probably knows that you want him now that you know his true career. His ego is stroked in more than one way.
This is some real bull#@!t!!!!!
First off, you did not even ask his profession, he just up and volunteered the dumbs#$t.
Second, you did not counter with, So..what do you do?....that right there is a sign of "you are your profession."
Now, I also live in NYC and I find this extremely rude to directly ask someone there profession. Is it just me. I have been in some many instances here and everyone feels that this is completely kosher to just come out and say "what do you do?"...... wtf do you do? what yo mama do? why the hell are you asking me this?.......ugh!!!! I find it extremely offensive and rude.
Maybe I just can't completely adjust to NYC life, but I find that this question blatantly states " I am attempting to sum you up based on what your employment status is." That makes me sick. Damn, can we look at the person at all anymore? Does personality count for anything?
Now OP, I think you do not have to prove yourself to anyone and participating in this bull is beneath you.....you will find a real man....and when you do, I can almost guarantee he will not be asking you some s#@t about.."what do you do?"
We all want to be amoungst people (especially someone we will be life partners with) as being somewhat on the same wavelength. This is human nature. You were honest and open and that is all you need. He was not. Bump that!!!
When you find him,he will be interested in you no matter what you do and your compatability will be obvious that such direct, rude questions will be unnecessary.
i but I leapt at the chance to work a block away from the original Sak's Fifth and Macy's, s
Wow! I think the saddest part of this is that the main message that isn't getting discussed enough in this thread is that the brother just wasn't that into OP.
He knew about her through friends and was probably really interested in seeing her in person after hearing about her.
However, when he finally got to have a conversation with her, he felt the need to "test" her. There aren't too many certainties in life but this always holds true, when a man wants a woman, he goes after her hard. He does whatever he can to seem more attractive to her, usually this involves bragging about his occupation and his bank account.
This guy was most likely somewhat attracted to OP, but after getting a sense of her attitude, he decided not to go full throttle and play some BS game to see if she was as materialistic as she was coming across either through actions, dress, etc. And just the fact that he pulled this prank shows that he had no true interest in OP at that point, since you can never make a woman really forgive you for lying to her or playing mind games.
OP may be successful, intelligent and attractive in her opinion, but she has no idea what characteristics he values in a mate and that's all that matters in this case. As a general rule of thumb, when a woman declares her career or educational achievement as the first trait about her, then she probably carries that cockiness in her day-to-day speech as well and that's not really that attractive to most men. Men want a good-looking woman who will be a good wife, meaning she should be supportive, compassionate, caring, loving, humble and able to respect her man in actions and words. A high-achieving guy does not need someone who is acting as more of a competitor instead of a supporter to his life's goals.
I think that OP should consider how she comes across to men to prevent any of them finding her to be less than sincere or superficial. It seems like she liked this guy alot now that she knows his earning potential (at least enough to warrant time creating a whole thread about this dude).
And it hurts me a bit to think of how her face and body language must have changed when he said he was a security guard. People never think about their body language and that's what confirmed to him that she was definitely not worth his time. Did she look startled when he said security guard, did she look away from him, turn her body away, look down at her wine glass, did she let an uncomfortable silence grow, did her eyes get big, did her face read a big "all hell naw, you're a rent a cop" albeit subconsciously? The sad thing is that she must have done something earlier to cause him to feel like she deserved such a silly test. If he had truly liked OP, he never would have played a game and he would have made several attempts to get her number and email address.
The sum of a man's value is not tied to his career or bank account. I think we all can agree that a man's character is his most important trait. His ability to provide should be second or lower on the list of desired traits in a mate. The man must have been attractive, polite, intelligent-sounding, etc and that's why OP carried on a convo with him, but when he said he was a security guard (despite the fact that he was already no longer interested in her IMHO), she could have saved face by picking up on his attire and his vocabulary, she should have used deductive reasoning and determined if he really "seemed" like a regular ol' security officer. Something tells me he was dressed nicely (i.e. designer clothes, semi-expensive watch, top-notch blackberry), had a decent vocabulary and had conversation that gave evidence of his educational status. She should have asked him where he worked and how he came to know her (I'm assuming) high-achieving friends, where he went to school, what his plans were and never let her face show disappointment.
It's ok not to want to marry a broke man, but it's not right to think of/treat someone differently because of their chosen careers. The man may not be right for you because of his salary, but he is still a man and deserving of respect.
So as someone pointed out earlier, too many BW are sloppy "gold-diggers". All you have to do is ask yourself what does your ideal guy want in a wife and be that. If you answer that question seriously, you'll learn to change the way you present yourself to men. It's great if you're like me and have a wonderful career and the highest degree in the land, but you probably will be single in your 40s if you make each prospect address you by your full title.
Think about it, when a guy asks you to describe yourself, do you start with "I'm a lawyer. I work at F.U. & Lebowski on 5th. I went to Spelman, graduated with top honors. I went to Emory for my JD, etc". Most people don't want your resume on a date or at a casual setting. You are hopefully more than your job and so is that guy, so try to be more engaging, "Oh, let's see, I love to travel. In fact, I just got back from a weekend trip in Baja California, and then I went to LA to catch up with some friends from undergrad. I grew up in Decatur, GA and went to my mom's alma mater, Spelman. While there I volunteered for a woman's shelter and got interested in criminal law. The director at the center wrote this wonderful recommendation letter for my law school applications and through the grace of God and the deans at Emory, I now have my JD. I loved living in ATL, but I leapt at the chance to work a block away from the original Sak's Fifth and Macy's, so that's why I was floored when Lebowski called me up for an interview! Enough about me, tell me more about you!"
And from there you have given the same information about how fabulously smart and high-achieving you are, but it's a heck of a lot more interesting and compassionate sounding. It gives your life story texture and it invites a host of questions and opportunity for the guy to find similarities with you. This is the way I roll. I give a dose of compassionate stuff, then I talk about career goals I have met all the while articulating that I am a great all-the-way around potential wife and have a life outside of my job.
eh, considering the questions that ran through your head after hearing about the security guard thing, i guess it is kind of warranted?
if you have good conversation/are attracted to someone, does it matter to be like 'o no this will not work' before even going on a date? i dont think its a golddigger thing, especially if he knew you were an attorney first. basically its a 'is she attracted to me or attracted to the social status/regard/whatever that goes with being an attorney' (not saying thats the only reason to be attracted) but your reaction to him as an attorney vs. a security guard were significantly different (even if this was a mental thought process that you did not think you displayed through your actions). (which may have been why he didn't ask for your number)
but really, it doesn't matter in the long run does it since he didnt ask for your number & you do not want to date him because he lied.
Yet again I find myself not agreeing with the majority today, LOL. I am not happy that he lied but he probably wanted to see if you liked him for him and not his title or earing potential. I know it is unfair of him to categorize you OP but some women just want a man for his title. Most of my cousins are men and it's funny that once their Benz/BMW/Bentley is in the "shop" their dates become busy. Or if they borrow my car the date seems uncomfortable. I don't condone the lies but I understand.
Since when?
Yet again I find myself not agreeing with the majority today, LOL. I am not happy that he lied but he probably wanted to see if you liked him for him and not his title or earing potential. I know it is unfair of him to categorize you OP but some women just want a man for his title. Most of my cousins are men and it's funny that once their Benz/BMW/Bentley is in the "shop" their dates become busy. Or if they borrow my car the date seems uncomfortable. I don't condone the lies but I understand.
All I know is, all that being extra for fear of goldiggers is... EXTRA.
And stupid.
Poor guy. All these women with their claws outstretched, just waiting to dig into him for his money.
You don't have to result to lies to find out if a woman is only into you for your money.
I think he was absolutely wrong for lying. And I would be seriously concerned about dating him b/c what else is he going to lie about??
And, also, since when is it considered rude to ask someone what they do? Especially on a date? Salary, i would totally get, but not a job. Besides, its a point of conversation, something to get the conversation flowing.
I think that when you are dating, esp if you are looking for a future mate, well that first date is the time to get to know them and weed out people you wont mesh with. IMO, questions like 'what do you do, are you married, do you have kids' all fair game, especially if you know its a dealbreaker point.
And it hurts me a bit to think of how her face and body language must have changed when he said he was a security guard.
Most likely to test your reaction to him being a "security guard"
Maybe Im nuts but I would be like "oh good one!" and laugh it off
WOW, some people have missed the point, completely!
Yes, some women are gold diggers, and many men want to avoid that; however, how could he think she wanted him for his 'status' when she does the EXACT SAME THING? She is an attorney, too. What did he have to gain by lying? The girl is making her own bank and has her own status!
HE asked about profession. He put it out there. If he was so concerned about whether a woman genuinely wanted to get to know him, he would have kept the conversation about sports, literature, the weather, whatever... Why does he have the right to know what she does, but she has to settle for getting lied to? She is doing her own thing, but a dude is still trying to figure out her intentions? Doesn't even make sense.
So much sympathy for a guy who flat out lied in order to test women to be sure they "want him for him".
I vote all beautiful women start running around in grey sweatsuits, white sneakers, coke bottle glasses, and pony tails. Oooh, and paint on a wart with a few zits.
Let's make sure men want us for US and not our looks.
I wonder if the OP was a non-Black woman if these immature man-child would have lied about his occupation. Did I mention his behavior is a big *** RED FLAG?