i wonder if we would be having this discussion if the problem was anal or some other kind of sex considered extra kinky like freaky fetishes.
i agree with Q. you like what you like. just becuase some women think sucking johnsons is mandatory or should be or everyone does it DOES NOT MAKE IT SO. not every woman goes down on her man and vice versa. there is no need to side eye a sista cause she does not. what's relevant and normal to you may not be to the next person. now, demeaning is a whole nother topic and thread for another time about how women are taught to feel about sex.
he was wrong for cheating and if his wife does not like to suck johnson then he has to ACCEPT THAT. he should have known** that this could be a possibility. she has tried - had she not she would not have known about the "taste" - so he has to respect that.
**if they didn't have sex before marriage, then you put yourself in a position to ACCEPT THAT PERSON WHOLE when you marry them because there is NO test drive, so you are basically claiming, as you do in your vows, to accept them for who they are. that's the actual problem here, he's broken his vows to accept her.
see her sucking his penis is not going to change the fact that he is willingly cheating on his wife. i didn't know penis sucking was the lynchpin to a successful marriage. silly me!
i'm so glad my so would never cheat on me for something like this. but you have to at least TALK about things like this before marriage - esp if you find them important.
i don't get why this is even debateable.
this madonna whore ish and the trickle down effects of it is still prevalant i see.
i mean, lots of women don't like a small penis so we all do that feel test before we even see the goods. ya'll know what i'm talkin about! if it's too little we jetting. heavy making out after date, hand to crotch...or so i've heard!
![Sekret :sekret: :sekret:](/smilies/sekret.gif)
so you have to do your due dilligence and research this ish! but i believe in test drives though! or test, see, feel, something!
if he knew he needed suck/swallow, whatever - then he should have brought it up and if he had no test drive realized that it may never happen. everyone is not going to like what you like. i mean, dang, isn't this ish elementary common sense????
now i see why the divorce rate is so high -- where is that list someone posted about marrying the wrong person. first thing on the list was: expecting people to change. the argument can't be he didn't know as i made my point above. marrying with no test drive means you accept the person as is THEN AND THERE. anything extra is just icing on the cake.