chocolat79
Well-Known Member
I know we talk about men approaching us or NOT approaching us. There are women here who have men breaking down their doors and then we have women here who say they can't get a man to look at them. There are women who say they know umpteen quality men who are looking for that quintessential woman and women who don't know ANY quality men.
I'm always somewhat skeptical when someone says they know LOTS of quality guys who are looking for their counterpart. Maybe it's my cynicism, but I automatically defer to the thought: What's wrong with him? Is he short? Unattractive? Boring as h#ll? etc., etc.
So, my question is: How do you personally define a quality man? Are we talking financials, personality, ambition, willingness/readiness for a relationship/marriage, ideals/morals/values/ethics, etc.? Also, how big does the aesthetics play in "quality" men? Are the "quality" men the unattractive or undesirable men, aesthetically or personality-wise?
Let's discuss.
ETA: I understand that quality is subjective, but I'm talking about in the broad, generalized sense of "quality".
I'm always somewhat skeptical when someone says they know LOTS of quality guys who are looking for their counterpart. Maybe it's my cynicism, but I automatically defer to the thought: What's wrong with him? Is he short? Unattractive? Boring as h#ll? etc., etc.
So, my question is: How do you personally define a quality man? Are we talking financials, personality, ambition, willingness/readiness for a relationship/marriage, ideals/morals/values/ethics, etc.? Also, how big does the aesthetics play in "quality" men? Are the "quality" men the unattractive or undesirable men, aesthetically or personality-wise?
Let's discuss.
ETA: I understand that quality is subjective, but I'm talking about in the broad, generalized sense of "quality".