bravenewgirl87
New Member
It defeats the purpose of marriage to begin with.
McDreamy said:That's fine Shimmie.
And for the record, I do see where you're coming from.
Personally, I wouldn't do it. But I can see why others go ahead with it.
cocoberry10 said:Hopefully they aren't sexually involved, but unfortunately, that's not always the case. SOME men w/baby mamas are permanently attached to those women, not just b/c of the children, but b/c there are feelings or interactions that lead to indiscretions. NOT ALWAYS, BUT SOMETIMES. I've had friends that were dating men w/children, and they've come to find out that the man was still sleeping with his baby's mother. But men like that are childish!
Caramel_Diva said:Only if I get to have several husbands....
JFemme said:Yes, two men/husbands and me.... sure darn could....
NoNapNique said:Exactly!
Hubby #1 would be "well strapped" and energetic
Hubby #2... Ummmm... knows how to "dine" well and *makes LOVE* so good that I'm hypnotized for days
Hubby #3 has AWESOME listening and communication skills, and spoils me rotten
Shimmie said:That's a stupid woman too.... Just think more highly of 'yourself' (general you....not you McDreamy).
McDreamy, for the record. I read where you have family members in this situation. I can understand your sincerity and I respect your views on this so my comments and feelings are not directed at you personally and how you feel about this. You obviously have compassion and I do respect you.
But I don't (have compassion nor yield)! I don't believe a woman has to settle for less just to appease a man or to have a man.
I'm not sharing my husband with anyone. It's either 'just me' or I'm off to someone else, no matter what color/ race who is satisfied with me and only me. It's just dumb and weak for a woman to 'settle' for less and allowing a man to have the best of her and gives her less in return. It's just plain stupid.
No woman needs to be that desperate to have a man or a home...Please all that for a house! There are too many other men out there to be with... ALONE!
No disrespect intended, but there are some customs that bring women down to a level of disgrace and this is one of them. I'm sorry but it is. No man is going to disgrace me by making me subject to another woman. I DO NOT compete for a man's affections. There is no such thing as sharing a spouse. It's sick and it is disease bound in ones, body and soul.
Why is "Africa" so disease prone with AIDs? Multiple sex partners.
Anyway.... it's stupid!
zora said:Multiple partners outside of marriage. Let's state the facts please.
Glamourous said:I understand that. But men in polygamous marriages are ALWAYS sleeping with a different women. And the woman does not get to sleep with anyone else, she just has to wait til he chooses to sleep with her. With the "baby mama situation", she can sleep with other people and choose whether or not to sleep with her babys father.
cocoberry10 said:Multiple partners increase one's risk for STD's, including AIDS. And this is whether you are married to them or not. (no offense to your post)
zora said:Multiple partners outside of marriage. Let's state the facts please.
Fact: It happens both ways. No one is using protection in or out of multi-marriage.zora said:Multiple partners outside of marriage. Let's state the facts please.
Hil84figer said:Well, what my uncle told me was the in the mining towns like in South Africa. These man would have unprotected sex with women there. They had sex outside of marriage. One of my uncles has two wives. My grandpa had many too. You can't blame AIDS in the continent of Africa on plural marriage. AIDS is may not be as rampant in South Africa as lets say my family's country Ghana. We need to look at the statistics of each country in Africa to see the actual number of people dying.
You are Totally Correct! Yet this is so sad.Afrolinda said:ITA. People forget that black men who have been to prison and the ones with multiple girlfriends are the ones who are giving aids to Black women in America. It happened to Magic ( he was married and it was a monogamous relationship ).
Hil84figer said:Well, what my uncle told me was the in the mining towns like in South Africa. These man would have unprotected sex with women there. They had sex outside of marriage. One of my uncles has two wives. My grandpa had many too. You can't blame AIDS in the continent of Africa on plural marriage. AIDS is may not be as rampant in South Africa as lets say my family's country Ghana. We need to look at the statistics of each country in Africa to see the actual number of people dying.
Afrolinda said:Men in monogamous relationships do that too ( the statistics are oh so high ) the wife just doesn't know of course.
That's one of the things that ticks me off about it. I mean really 'ticks' me off. I'm not making it easy for him and heartbreaking for me. Nope!Glamourous said:Note the ALWAYS. Married me may have sex with other people "a lot" (whatever percentage that is), but in polygamous relationships men are ALWAYS having multiple partners. A-L-W-A-Y-S
Glib Gurl said:Really? Would you mind giving us more info - like was it based on religion or culture? How many spouses were there?
Shimmie said:Why is "Africa" so disease prone with AIDs? Multiple sex partners.
isobell said:wow! regardless of how I feel about polygamous marriages this statement is just ridiculous to me, how is the way AIDS is transmitted in Africa any different from how it's transmitted anywhere else in the world? Is this the reason why there is an AIDS epidemic in Africa? Not lack of sex education? Not the paucity of medical care and medications? Not poverty etc? The reason according to you is because of the cultural practice of polygamy, that has been mostly phased out over the past few generations? Please refrain from reiterating the stereotypes people have about Africa, there's more than enough misinformation out there!
JCoily said:Couldn't do it.
Not just because of the pettyness which wreaks havoc on woman to woman relationships, but I don't want competition when it comes to what my children would inherit upon his death. And for damn sure, I wouldn't want my children to have to compete for affection from a father who may or may not show preference to another womans children for whatever reason.
CherrySBR said:A man should have a will and inheritance should be divided equally amongst his children. I think a real man would love all his children the same. I am a mother and I love my children the same, why cant a man.
I have heard that before,but I dont know of any relationships such as those.JCoily said:In a rational world, you would be right.
However, people are flawed and there are many men with children by multiple women who treat the children according to how they feel about the mother. There is an old cliche about children of a first marriage being put on the back burner or damn near forgotten when daddy has brand new shiny kids by the new wife.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCoily
In a rational world, you would be right.
However, people are flawed and there are many men with children by multiple women who treat the children according to how they feel about the mother. There is an old cliche about children of a first marriage being put on the back burner or damn near forgotten when daddy has brand new shiny kids by the new wife.
CherrySBR said:I have heard that before,but I dont know of any relationships such as those.