MrsHouston
Well-Known Member
If I were in one, I'd want to be the one with two spouses (two husbands LOL
just joking
just joking
I've seen the effects of polygamy in my own family and it is a mess. Women hating each other and each other's kids. Wishing and plotting for each other and each other's kids to die. Man's life cut short from the stress of his wives' drama or from getting caught in the crossfire of one of their plots. Children unloved and treated more like cattle than like humans, underachieving for lack of parental attention b/c the parents are too busy fighting each other. It's a mess. A terrible mess. I would leave and never, ever forgive any man who tried to impose that kind of situation on me and my future children.
Yes, I could as long as those heffas was doing some work around the house too. I'm serious too! We share the man, then we share the responsibilities--cook, clean, diapers, everything!
Disclaimer: This is not directed at the OP, simply the topic. Now for my POV.
I couldn't do multiple husbands, that's too much work for me. As for the other.....
I get paid less than a man for the same work, my skills are second guessed because I'm a woman, there are places here and around the world where women are deemed undeserving of an education, places where it's acceptable for a man to beat or burn his wife, where women have no rights to even claim rape, old men marry young women every day. So, am I willing to give them another perk?
Hm....let's see. I respect him by being with only one man, but he gets to choose which flavor of love he wants for the night/week/month and I have to come to terms with it? What do I get? Less money, less time with him oh and a dirty member that's been up inside another woman. No. Thank You. What's next, if all women walk around naked it'll numb their senses to female sexuality thereby reducing sexual harassment cases
It's the male fantasy of female multiplicity and for "some" it's a way of being with another women without god's scorn. It's seem oddly convenient that it's still practiced even in instances where there's no practical purpose. My only real beef with polygamy is that often it accompanies a high level of sexism. If it were just a lifestyle I'd have no problem, but the men who have often "explained" polygamy to me are usually dead against Polyandry (1 wife, multiple husbands) regardless of circumstances. Not to mention, they also have some really disturbing opinions on women.
Yes I would consider it.This is often the topic of discussion in our Muslim gatherings. It is more of a fantasy, than reality. Big Love was a TV show. That is the ideal situation (of polygamy), and even it had drama. Men don't realize the struggle polygamy has. My dh always says men need to at least wait ten years before trying to go that route. Most older men only have one wife, either out of wisdom, or experience w/it and it not working.In my opinion it:
-is to benefit women more than men
-can work well when done properly
-can make the woman's life much easier
-Is not required,nor suggested
-can only be done by "special" men, and women for that matter
While this is not something I necessarily want, I could see myself in it. But not in my current marriage. We have too many issues, and him getting another wife would be directly related to me.( It has to be 100% to benefit the other woman). But if I get divorced I will probably be in a polygamous marriage next time.
ETA: After being married to highschool sweetheart, the next one would not be so much for love. I mean I would want to love him, but it would just be different. I would not mind sharing.
Just a little curious about the items in red... How?
I would really like to hear more about this from the women that have knowledge about it.
How could this work in this day and age? Are the women really happy under this arrangement?
I would to. In many past/traditional communities it worked:
1. because women outnumber men, but women could not be breadwinners, so it helped to keep all women supported by a man, even if it meant polygamy.
2. Due to misunderstanding of biology, women were often blamed for the sex of children, so if a woman had 3 girls, the man would marry someone else to try for a boy.
3. The more kids a man had, the better, so once one wife was past childbearing/barren/past her prime, the man remarried for more kids.
4. It was a sign of wealth because a man had to be rich to afford more than one wife.
So, I'm really curious to know why today, when all the above doesn't necessarily matter or is understood, how a woman benefits from a plural marriage.
One thing not commonly discussed about biology as well is that women are better off being promiscuous. I dont see how being in a plural marriage with 1 man many women benefits women biologically.