As a single woman, I think that until a commitment(marriage) is established, it is naive not to date "around"...note I said date, not SLEEP around...
Personally, until you find the person that satisfies you completely, and the feeling is mutual, please don't settle...
My side dish is a complete winer and diner who knows that I have a man. He's sweet and great company, and respects my boundaries. He made a comment that my man hasn't put a ring on my finger yet, so it's no reason why I shouldn't feel free to spend time with him. I'm kinda starting to see the light in that statement...
Now, why ya got to go excluding us married folks? We need extras more than anybody...Lawd knows we do...
(for real, though)..I'm with DL, who has the time....
Mens can be oh-so-much work...
there's nothing physical going on between me and...lets call him Mr. Biggs, but there has been activity in the past when we were both single (went to college together). All that ended when I told him that I wanted to be in a relationship w/my beau. My beau is amazing in almost every aspect, but what he lacks, Mr. Biggs has (and vice versa). I still wanted to remain friends with Mr. Biggs because he was great company, total gentlemen, and is nice to talk to (no pressure for marriage and kids like my beau). Whenever I go over to his place, we always just watch tv/movies together, and I might sleep over in the guest room.
i like the idea of diversifying my portfolio. why should i be so tied down at 23?
What's wrong with sleeping with more than one man if you're not married?
Um, NO!!!
Why the hell would I do that?
How would I feel if he has someone on the side for "just in case"
I'm sorry, I see the majority in this thread are saying that it's cool. I just don't agree at all.
Um, NO!!!
Why the hell would I do that?
How would I feel if he has someone on the side for "just in case"
I'm sorry, I see the majority in this thread are saying that it's cool. I just don't agree at all.
Excuse me omnipadme, I mean no harm......but is this the same boyfriend that you said you were gonna break up with a few months ago? I only remember because I remember posting in your thread and siding with YOU. However, now I'm starting to think maybe all the other ladies were right.
You're right...you are young and fabulous so by all means, do you and have an expansive "portfolio" and whatnot, but really though.....why are you holding on to a relationship, a commitment with your boyfriend if you don't want to be tied down?
I know some men and women like to stay coupled up....they just don't feel right unless they have someone that they can call 'boyfriend' or 'girlfriend'. Even if it means being with someone that isn't really doing it for them. Do you think this is you?
I don't mean to laugh but you went hard on this subject.
But I totally agree with you! I don't have anything on the side because to me its immoral (under the guise of committed relationship, otherwise, I'm all for it) and I wouldn't want it to happen to me.
Now, why ya got to go excluding us married folks? We need extras more than anybody...Lawd knows we do...
I don't mean to laugh but you went hard on this subject.
But I totally agree with you! I don't have anything on the side because to me its immoral (under the guise of committed relationship, otherwise, I'm all for it) and I wouldn't want it to happen to me.
HEY ARMY!!!
Girl, I gotta give you a spanking for that comment!! !!!!!
Are you serious??!! You lil skank!! (j/k... I think!! )
This is along the lines of not putting all your eggs in one basket.
Married women excluded, how many of you attached -but not married- ladies have someone on the side just for company who could take your SO's place if you ever decided to go that route?
I may get stoned for this but IMO women and men define relationship differently. A man can have a girlfriend and still keep his options open because she's not his wife..doesn't matter if ya'll live together been together for years or whatever. When given an opportunity I've heard many a man say "well I'm not married so....." Exclusive to SOME men is only an option once they get married and even then if an opportunity presents itself they'll act now and worry about being sorry later.
As women when we say that's my man I'm his girlfriend we think that because we've agreed to be monogamous and committed that he's gonna do the same and when we find out that he hasn't held up his end of the deal we are heartbroken and he's confused 'cause you are not his wife so he thinks you are supposed to just get over it.
I believe that lots of men keep women on the side. That's why when ya'll break up you find out that he didn't waste any time he's already got with so and so and she's big and pregnant or he up and marries some girl right after you break up and you wonder where she came from and when he met her.erplexed
Women have sat back forever and let men have all of the fun so why shouldn't an unmarried women keep her options open?
Holla!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't live my life like a married person until I'm fully married with an official ring (or ring holder) and the marriage papers signed so that just in case he kicks the bucket I get the insurance and not bragging rights/memories of how good he was to me. I have myriad friend guys so its only normal for me to have a standby guy in times of crisis that understands my pending situation and to take me out with NSA.
Now I've never proposed to be an angel (and I'm not about to change to let yall know what angel/good girl I am only to reveal a couple months down the road that your man who you was so good to you went astray!!! "What should you do???") But I think if more women had these type of what I call Standby men who are platonic, at least until/if your situation ends, then there would be less women chasing after some of these men who don't want to be caught or led to water. With that said, its nice to have a standby guy because if you ever break up with your friend then you're tossed back into the processing of enjoying yourself until the next best thing comes along.
However, it seems that the longer I be in this current relationship, the more my standbys are dropping off the market and thats fine with me because the thing is that I'm friends with most of them and that will never change.
Of course... Anything else would be less than civilized.
Holla!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't live my life like a married person until I'm fully married with an official ring (or ring holder) and the marriage papers signed so that just in case he kicks the bucket I get the insurance and not bragging rights/memories of how good he was to me. I have myriad friend guys so its only normal for me to have a standby guy in times of crisis that understands my pending situation and to take me out with NSA.
Now I've never proposed to be an angel (and I'm not about to change to let yall know what angel/good girl I am only to reveal a couple months down the road that your man who you was so good to you went astray!!! "What should you do???") But I think if more women had these type of what I call Standby men who are platonic, at least until/if your situation ends, then there would be less women chasing after some of these men who don't want to be caught or led to water. With that said, its nice to have a standby guy because if you ever break up with your friend then you're tossed back into the processing of enjoying yourself until the next best thing comes along.
However, it seems that the longer I be in this current relationship, the more my standbys are dropping off the market and thats fine with me because the thing is that I'm friends with most of them and that will never change.