Sistaslick said:
Navs, it kinda seems that your logic requires someone to explicitly voice their particular reasons for relaxing. And that reason only, is the final proof and/or truth for that person at that time. Only by that person admitting or voicing that particular reasoning can it be said that this reasoning is valid. From this standpoint, the individual herself is the final authority. The reasoning behind the actions are as concrete as the answer given. But here, the predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors that may be governing the behavior are essentially ignored.
the fact that many people are following a "social script" when they relax and may not truly be fully aware of the deeper social roots of their actions. In this case, many will not admit that their relaxing comes from something beyond them and their manageability issues simply because they are not aware of it.
Edit: I have deleted the some of your response because once again, I have surpassed the character limit.
Now that I've had enough time to get off rampage mode (hahaha) and have my Mariska Hargitay fix, I think my first answer could have been more developed the first time around. I personally feel that I owe you more than what I gave you.
I do not believe that just because someone says something
isn't true that that means they are always telling the truth (the same is true for the contrary, just because someone says something
is true doesn't mean it is). Human beings can lie. They can even lie with their facial expressions (for instance, there are certain muscles around the eyes and in other areas of the face where you can often tell if someone is really smiling at you or just faking). Sometimes even human beings do not understand their own personal feelings so I definitely see where you are coming from about people not being able to admit something that they are not aware of. It's kinda like asking if an insane person actually KNOWS he or she is insane?
Thus, I believe that the individual is the authority in cases where the person is being truthful with you and has a good grasp on her knowledge, self esteem, and levels of consciousness in her mind. But in some cases there doesn't have to be an authority and there doesn't have to be a certainty (I will get to this later). If someone voices her reasons for relaxing and she IS educated about hair issues, sane, aware, and telling the truth, then that makes her the authority for your certainty. But if someone does not voice her reason for relaxing then you do not know what she feels or doesn't feel with any certainty at all.
Here is where the certainty/authority issues become shaky. I'm sure several of us have had people lie right to our faces. At face value, if I think someone is acting the way she is because of any particular reason and she denies it, I still cannot say with absolute certainty that she is lying. The only thing I can say with certainty is "Well, I think she really does have a problem with her hair and that is why she relaxes but I don't know that for sure."
I also believe that this hair query is a deeper psychological issue for MANY people. Many people do follow a social construct when they relax and some may be aware of this, some may not. However, many who relax may not be following any type of social construct or suffering from a self esteem issue, they may just be doing so on their own personal accord. For some it may be much deeper than a manageability issue (I said myself that there are other ways to manage your hair without relaxing). However, for some others, the level of (perceived) manageability really may be all it is (maybe people are going for not just what is manageable but for what is MOST manageable or the EASIEST to manage in their opinion).
I feel that trying to say for certain that someone does anything to their hair based on the views of many others leads us into slippery territory. People can internalize things based on what they hear from someone in the environment. Sometimes if you say something enough times even if it isn't true, someone may decide to believe it. So if you wrongly perceive that someone has a self esteem issue who really doesn't and you repeatedly drill all this stuff into her head (in an abrasive manner) it may shake her confidence and she may start believing that she is just being a conformist and/or she is rejecting certain elements of her race (even though you may not have said this), which could lead to her questioning other areas of her individuality, and could subsequently lead to her becoming depressed about her hair and making decisions about her hair that could hurt her in the long run. On the contrary, what you say may not have a negative effect on her at all (especially if you were cordial; a lot of the time how our message is taken depends on how it is delivered). But if it did have a negative effect, it would be like when some psychologists convinced women that they were raped based on observations they'd made from other people. They did the research and personal interviews and they saw that many women who were raped yet somehow had repressed their rape growing up exhibited certain types of telltale behavior. Thus, they used the same methods they used to evoke these repressed memories in women who were actually raped on women that they mistakenly thought had been raped based on showing behaviors or making statements that were similar to the ones who truly had been. Some of these women "saw the light" in a sense that they truly believed that they had been raped just to find out later that these "memories" were planted into their heads. These psychologists made something they interpreted into a big deal/issue when it should not have been in the first place and thus they were somehow responsible for the damage on these girls' lives (and anyone else's they may have falsely accused of raping them), even if their initial intentions were good.
**Note: I am in no way saying that having an issue with your hair is in any way nearly as traumatic as being raped.
With that being said, I think this also applies to other psychological issues (such as many black women's views or self esteem issues with hair). It has been shown by word-of-mouth testimonies, research, and various other methods that many women do have a problem relating to this matter. Thus, based on this, we could say that many women who are relaxed do so because they are following (whether blindly or not) some social construct of beauty. However, we cannot diagnose someone on an individual basis on what may hold true for many others without more information than a comment she may have just made about her hair.
Now, let's say someone (let's call her Exhibit A) does have self esteem issues because of her hair and is well aware of this. Based on what you know to be true about other people having self esteem issues about hair, you may bring up some questions or points that could help her overcome these issues. She could deny them coming and going and swear up and down she has no problems. Your head may be telling you she is lying but it still wouldn't solve anything to argue any further because some people are too close-minded or stubborn to admit the truth. In this case, NO ONE is the final authority because the individual is lying to you and you may feel that she is, but you just cannot say beyond a shadow of a doubt that she is with 100% certainty. I mean, you could make her take a polygraph but those won't hold up in court because people know how to trick them hahaha. What I'm saying is that everything isn't black and white. It's not always a case of the individual is the final authority or the observer is the final authority or the community is the final authority. It's ok for there not be a final authority. It's ok not to be certain of everything. Sometimes there are just things we will never know for certain and we would waste our time and energy trying to say for sure that a particular thing is what it is because of X, Y, or Z.
Now, Exhibit B. She makes a negative comment about her texture and because this comment is the same that many others who have issues with their texture have made, you proceed to tell her that she has deeper underlying issues because in your head you feel she is. For her, it is true that she only made this comment this time about hating her hair because she is the one who chose to manipulate it the wrong way that day when she and her natural hair had been getting along just fine otherwise haha. And for what it's worth, I'll tell you that Exhibit B really didn't have any underlying deeper issues just because of that one comment. So in this case, who is the final authority? She is. Does that mean that all you have learned about other people who do in fact have self esteem issues/are following a construct with their hair is any less valid? No. It just means this person is the exception and you may find many others as well.
And last but not least you have Exhibit C who you think has a problem with her texture and it turns out that she even admits she does
after you've brought up helpful information. I am going to inform you that Exhibit C is telling the truth and she's not just agreeing with you to make you stop talking lol. Now who is the final authority? She is. However, you were the initial authority on this case because it turns out that you were right all along.
Cliff Notes Version: Sometimes we are right, sometimes we are not. That's what we know for certain. Sometimes someone is the authority on letting us know the truth but sometimes there isn't anyone to give us truth or a definite answer so we can just accept that and move on. There are many mysteries to be had in life.