ackee walk
Well-Known Member
ah. thanks for clarifying. i was misunderstanding you.
I think its pretty simple. LHCF represents a better educated/employed strata of the black community (compared to a random sampling). And there is a widely publicized (and held?) belief that better educated/employed BW are struggling to meet/maintain/marry BM. So folks are looking for other options rather than truly examine why they might be struggling.
That and, on LHCF, we'd rather discuss successful dating tactics with IR men than BM. Believing that equally yoked BM who are marriage minded and interested in Black women exist and discussing good relationships with BM on LHCF, can eat into one's LHCF street-cred...
Interesting choice of words with the bolded.Care to expound?
I also think its a matter of class... but kind of in a different way. It may be counter-intuitive and its completely anecdotal theory, but I feel upperclass (or at least college-educated and above) white men are more open to marrying outside their race than lower class white men.
Granted, I don't have much exposure to lower class white men ANYMORE, but white dudes from where I grew up weren't really checking for black chicks, but the ones I interact with now just seem to be more open.
I don't like to "out" myself as an interracial dater but meh, I'll bite since yall don't know me. For me personally, I just couldn't find a black man who wanted to settle down with me.
I'm not dictating anything (please indicate where I have). I've read about some of your experiences (i.e. Mischka about town) but that's about it.And the only consistency in my nb relationships is also me, which I would consider less stressful, more successful, and less hurtful. So should we examine that as well?
Please don't try to draw a parallel that doesn't exist. I know what my experiences have been and there have been marked differences in the way I feel I am being treated depending on who I date, and the difference is culture and upbringing and I'm the same person. I know you have an agenda to push but you need to find another target, because what you are doing is not only transparent but unfair. You know the type of demographic that would agree with you thus lending credibility to your words, so you make an example out of me, thus discrediting mine. You can accept that I have had unsuccessful experiences dating black men (because it's easy to put the blame on me because of that) but on the flip side I would like you to then accept that I have had more successful experiences dating non black men (which you would not like to accept because to do so by the same token of blaming me you would have to remove that blame, and it eliminates your point).
Either way, you're still trying to dictate what my experiences have and have not been in order to fit your point. It's rude.
To speak from personal experiences - I came out of a relationship with a dude who was fun and exciting but lacked intelligence and ambition. When we stopped dating I found myself super frustrated with the fact that I kept meeting people like him (Dear God: Really? This is it for me?!?).Interesting choice of words with the bolded.Care to expound?
I also think its a matter of class... but kind of in a different way. It may be counter-intuitive and its completely anecdotal theory, but I feel upperclass (or at least college-educated and above) white men are more open to marrying outside their race than lower class white men.
Granted, I don't have much exposure to lower class white men ANYMORE, but white dudes from where I grew up weren't really checking for black chicks, but the ones I interact with now just seem to be more open.
I'm not dictating anything (please indicate where I have). I've read about some of your experiences (i.e. Mischka about town) but that's about it.
I actually was drawing more on my own experiences. I've posted time and time again about how the biggest thing that affected who I found myself dating was my own behavior. That and the fact that I also realize that there are a number of factors that lead to who we date that are completely out of our control.
In other areas of our lives we change ourselves to fit the circumstances. We change for educational and professional pursuits. But the notion of changing for romantic pursuits is seen as either a last resort or desperate and that's never made sense to me.
which appears to be a direct insinuation that my behaviors somehow warrant or cause certain experiences. Nothing about this indicates you were thinking of your own experiences and the repeated use of second person pronouns indicates that you were, in fact, speaking to my experiences/posts so you can understand my misinterpretation. I understand we have differing opinions on the issue and when you post things like this it feels like you are asking me to justify my experiences (like, that's how you feel about yours but it isn't how I feel about mine and I don't think I should have to defend that), although I can accept that that may not have been your intention.Something I've often wondered about people who have sentiments like yours (I have bad experiences therefore, they must be bad): The only consistency in your various relationships with BM is you. Why is automatically assumed that the variety in THEM is the reason why your attempts haven't yielded the results that you want...?
A few things: I don't engage in internet beefs. If I have something to say it, I'll say it. And I don't pretend to know more/less about people on the internet other than what they publicly post. So when you say relationships with black men haven't worked out, I'm interpreting that at its most basic level "we met, we dated, it didn't work out".I see. In future might you not draw from your own experience in relation to my posts? It's very hard to disentangle those intentions when you post things like this:which appears to be a direct insinuation that my behaviors somehow warrant or cause certain experiences. Nothing about this indicates you were thinking of your own experiences and the repeated use of second person pronouns indicates that you were, in fact, speaking to my experiences/posts so you can understand my misinterpretation. I understand we have differing opinions on the issue and when you post things like this it feels like you are asking me to justify my experiences (like, that's how you feel about yours but it isn't how I feel about mine and I don't think I should have to defend that), although I can accept that that may not have been your intention.
A few things: I don't engage in internet beefs. If I have something to say it, I'll say it. And I don't pretend to know more/less about people on the internet other than what they publicly post. So when you say relationships with black men haven't worked out, I'm interpreting that at its most basic level "we met, we dated, it didn't work out".
And I came straight out and said it already - I take issue with the notion of dating IRR in response to failed relationships with BM. And on LHCF folks would rather talk about whats BM are doing wrong than whats the other consistent thread in Black-On-Black relationships could be doing wrong ... US and OUR actions.
When I finally admitted to myself that, yes I do have a preference for Asian men and no, I no longer give a fluck what anyone else thinks my world changed. I also decided I would stick to my requirements for a relationship and with that attitude I met my fiancé. He rose to my requirements and he treats me like a princess. He's the first man I feel truly understands me and loves me for me. He loved me fat or thin, happy or bishy, straight or kinky. I've never had that before. He's the first man I've met that has as deep a commitment to family as I do.
Ok, enough of the love letterMy point is it was a combination of changing my attitude (ie settling because I was afraid of being alone) and opening my options up.
I think you may have misread my post - not its content but the (lack of) emotion behind it. My first paragraph was simply me trying to explain how I operate on LHCF to let you know that I was not trying to dig and start some message board back and forth.Listen. This has nothing to do with internet beef. I'm simply saying how your post came across to me and how, if that's not what you meant, that's why I took it the way I did. Take issue with IRR however you want as long as you don't project that into interpreting MY POSTS into things *I* didn't say. Why does there even have to be such a hostile response here? I enjoy your posts and I think this is derailing this thread, and both those things being true, I'm asking that you not focus your agenda at ME.
I don't give a siht about black on black relationships, so I'm not sure why my posts are some kind of example for the point you are trying to make. I'm not interested in cultivating a black on black relationship, I don't care why my relationships with black men didn't succeed, and I don't plan on trying in the future, so if that's what you want to discuss I have no idea what that has to do with my posts in here.
Lol, I was talking more about having ghetto mannerisms, fashion, and hair styles ... you know the lower echelon look.I don't think appearing this way is going to appeal to most nbm. From the posts here, it doesn't seem like many are wearing apple bottom jeans, yelling in public, etc etc.
I actually think there is a lot of IRD going on in the mythical "lower echelon category" as well. Sometimes, they come from similar socioeconomic groups, but I've definitely seen it. I've also literally been bowled over by some IR couples where hubby looks so white bread and wifey is what would be considered "lower echelon" here. And I've definitely seen the kids as a result! I guess you could say it takes all kinds. Didn't ya'll see Napoleon Dynamite? Who can forget LaFawnda???[/QUOTE]
This is like one of my favorite movies. Did you see the extra footage on the dvd?
Well they both get married and LaFawnda's brother isat it all.
I was honestly surprised by how many women on here are in IR. From the way how some posters on here speak about white folks that would be the last thing I would think.
I actually think there is a lot of IRD going on in the mythical "lower echelon category" as well. Sometimes, they come from similar socioeconomic groups, but I've definitely seen it. I've also literally been bowled over by some IR couples where hubby looks so white bread and wifey is what would be considered "lower echelon" here. And I've definitely seen the kids as a result! I guess you could say it takes all kinds. Didn't ya'll see Napoleon Dynamite? Who can forget LaFawnda???
This is something I am curious about.
Why is IR dating so common on LHCF??
You read in articles that black women are the least likely to partake in it...but on here it seems fairly common...
Honest opinions, please.
I see you answered my question. I agree with you to an extent. The "educated, liberal" population may be more likely to date interracially than the poor conservative. But there are a lot of upper class conservatives who won't be crass about it, but certainly won't be crossing the color line either.Interesting choice of words with the bolded.Care to expound?
I also think its a matter of class... but kind of in a different way. It may be counter-intuitive and its completely anecdotal theory, but I feel upperclass (or at least college-educated and above) white men are more open to marrying outside their race than lower class white men.
Granted, I don't have much exposure to lower class white men ANYMORE, but white dudes from where I grew up weren't really checking for black chicks, but the ones I interact with now just seem to be more open.
Another question that I would like answered: Do you think that white men who are educated are more likely or less likely to get into an IR with a BW than an uneducated WM??
Another question that I would like answered: Do you think that white men who are educated are more likely or less likely to get into an IR with a BW than an uneducated WM??