FlutterGirl
New Member
I think, as a biologist, it's all about Darwin.
I know in some schools in the US they don't talk about his theories, which is weird IMHO. So if I offend some people, just tell me or mods erase this post.
Okay, we don't know what was the first hair texture humans had back in the very first day.
Some people say because of the wheater, it's a big advantage for us to have the big wooly hair, which makes sense. On the course of history some people had mutations in their DNA, so we can evolved. The biggest advantages were transmitted in the next generations. Remeber this was made over THOUSANDS of year. This isn't a whole day thing.
For example, someone may have a mutation in their DNA and came up with big kinky hair. That way that person can have a better protection for the sun and keep himself cold etc, so that was a BIG advantage. The one with the kinky hair reproduce and the ones who cannnot be protected by the sun disappeared little by little. So, having kinky hair was a stronger profile than having straight hair, just like it's more commun to have dark hair, brown eyes vs blond hair, blue eyes. I vulgarized a lot, so you could understand.
The same goes on with our skin... darker skin, big advantage vs light skin. Light skin can appear like straight hair, but it's rare.
The self-hatred thing about hair is all about society and brainwashing in my opinion. What's view beautiful in America may not be seen as the norm in other countries.
My two cents
I know in some schools in the US they don't talk about his theories, which is weird IMHO. So if I offend some people, just tell me or mods erase this post.
Okay, we don't know what was the first hair texture humans had back in the very first day.
Some people say because of the wheater, it's a big advantage for us to have the big wooly hair, which makes sense. On the course of history some people had mutations in their DNA, so we can evolved. The biggest advantages were transmitted in the next generations. Remeber this was made over THOUSANDS of year. This isn't a whole day thing.
For example, someone may have a mutation in their DNA and came up with big kinky hair. That way that person can have a better protection for the sun and keep himself cold etc, so that was a BIG advantage. The one with the kinky hair reproduce and the ones who cannnot be protected by the sun disappeared little by little. So, having kinky hair was a stronger profile than having straight hair, just like it's more commun to have dark hair, brown eyes vs blond hair, blue eyes. I vulgarized a lot, so you could understand.
The same goes on with our skin... darker skin, big advantage vs light skin. Light skin can appear like straight hair, but it's rare.
The self-hatred thing about hair is all about society and brainwashing in my opinion. What's view beautiful in America may not be seen as the norm in other countries.
My two cents
....imo thats a punishment. plus wasnt it said that Jesus had a wolly hair texture similar to our hair type?
thanks


i don't mean to be rude, that comment rubbed me the wrong way but IMO all can have long hair, why would God lay down one set of rules for one race, and another set of rules for another? God is a fair God, theres no fine print in the scripture lol. Maybe its just me but as i stated before, every black woman ive encoutered has the same story "i had long hair as a child and then i did *insert here* to it", and when i went to JA, i can surely say there was plenty women with long hair, and if it wasn't long it was most def healthy.