Well, it all depends on what you think it means to win and lose, both in sex and in the rest of life. But I always objected to bf when he said losers get a lot of play from women, even from some women who should be out of their league. I feel like I rarely see that, but maybe it's because of who I'm around? This interview with the authors of "Premarital Sex in America: How Young Americans Meet, Mate and Think About Marrying" say these "sub-optimal" men are getting more sexual partners than those who are college-educated and gainfully employed.
Where they talk about the cost of sex:
The source: The sexual cost of female success - Sex News, Sex Talk - Salon.com
Where they talk about the cost of sex:
I have thoughts on this, but I'll leave it open to you guys first.So how do we measure how people price this? A couple different ways: First, the time until they have sex in a relationship. A second measure is the number of sex partners that "sub-optimal men" have had. I define that group as men who are 22 years old, dropped out of high school and don't have a full-time job -- men who don't have a lot going for them. We compare the number of partners they've had with the number of partners of a male college graduate who is employed full-time. Theoretically, if sex is valuable to her then she's not going to trade it away to just some crummy man, and when we look at the data, we find that those sub-optimal men report a lot more partners than men who actually have a lot going for them.
The source: The sexual cost of female success - Sex News, Sex Talk - Salon.com
Last edited: