Hi @kanozas and to all of those reading...
It is imperative to weigh in on this statement (bolded above). God's Word -- The Bible is quite clear that not only is the 'ACT' of homosexuality sin, but even the thought of it. God is very clear about the thoughts of man, as sin starts in the mind and then becomes manifested into the act of it.
If I had cherished sin in my heart, the Lord would not have listened. (Psalm 66:18)
For from within, out of men's hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. (Mark 7:21-22)
Each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed. Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death. (James 1:14-15)
The Bible is clear that...'whatsoever a man 'thinketh' so is he." If a person 'thinks' they are gay, eventually they will 'live' it and not seek deliverance from it. For one to say that there is no psychological/biological (chemical) answer(s) is a lie straight from hell. There is an answer, it's sin...period. The statement above is very dangerous to one's soul, as it is the devil's deception of giving 'approval' to it, to keep one in bondage and it actually gives way to one having 'permission' to be a part of that lifestyle. Therefore, this concept is not from God. It never was, nor shall it ever be. The Truth is that it is not 'okay' to be gay. not even in thought. One has to know that it is sin and will always be sin, and that God does not approve of it, nor it's thoughts.
homosexuality is not an entitlement which is how it is being exalted. It was not eliminated from the Cross. It is not exempt from redemption. It is a sin that was indeed nailed to the Cross along with every other sin. Therefore, it is not true, that it is acceptable to be gay just as long as one is physically abstinent. One has to accept it as sin and to accept the redemption from it that Jesus so lovingly paid for...in Full.
I've shared this with compassion.
To God be the Glory... Amen.
@Shimmie, if I can help clarify, we definitely believe that people can sin in thought (such as indulging in illicit sexual fantasies, or entertaining the idea to harm or kill someone, etc.). If someone with homosexual tendencies gives in to lustful thoughts, yes, that would definitely be sin. The proclivity itself is what we call "disordered," meaning that it is not properly ordered the natural way God intended our sexuality to be (heterosexual and within the bonds of marriage). However, lustful thoughts/fantasies or engaging in such actions are sinful.
I think the friction or difference between what @kanozas is trying to say and what you are saying, is that you see the very existence of the affliction of homosexual desires as sinful, whereas @kanozas is trying to explain that the existence of this condition is a disorder, but this disorder turns into SIN when a person indulges in it by thought or by word.
Think of an alcoholic. Even a sober alcoholic who hasn't touched a drink in 30 years is still an alcoholic--and he may even be tempted at times to take a drink--however, in his heart and in his actions he chooses to say "No" to alcohol and walk the path of sobriety.
A person commits sin when he willfully gives his mind over to sinful thoughts or engages in sin--not because he is tempted by the sin. Sin, and temptation to sin, are two different things.
Thank you @Galadriel but they reject this fully and quite possibly do not see it as an affliction. They firmly believe that homosexual persons happen as a result of full will and not disordered nature in all cases of such. It's not just the act. It should extend to all people ...because their desires are still here. Some do not comprehend that all thoughts entering the mind are not our fault nor sin. We are aware of this due to reconciliation. But like you explained, entertained thoughts are the problem. The devil is busy sending evil thoughts all over the globe. It's what you do with them that counts. This is one reason I was appalled to read something to the effect that some would consider marrying a "former" gay person. I don't think that works in 99% of cases. Someone is going to be in distress. Human sexuality is highly complex and there are many things that people do not wish to address as it depends heavily on human psychology - somewhat of christian taboo. Anyhoo, they don't like discussions of this nature (though it be human nature for either good or bad) and I don't believe anybody is going to check our cited sources as to why we come to these conclusions. Besides, there is the suspicion ever present.
It's part of concupiscence--which we ALL must deal with until death.
ETA: we are all broken in some way, in this fallen world. And we all have a cross to bear. The point is to follow Him who gave us the perfect example on how to carry our crosses and battle against sin. The power of Christ's Cross is truly redemptive.
@Shimmie, if I can help clarify, we definitely believe that people can sin in thought (such as indulging in illicit sexual fantasies, or entertaining the idea to harm or kill someone, etc.). If someone with homosexual tendencies gives in to lustful thoughts, yes, that would definitely be sin. The proclivity itself is what we call "disordered," meaning that it is not properly ordered the natural way God intended our sexuality to be (heterosexual and within the bonds of marriage). However, lustful thoughts/fantasies or engaging in such actions are sinful.
I think the friction or difference between what @kanozas is trying to say and what you are saying, is that you see the very existence of the affliction of homosexual desires as sinful, whereas @kanozas is trying to explain that the existence of this condition is a disorder, but this disorder turns into SIN when a person indulges in it by thought or by word.
Think of an alcoholic. Even a sober alcoholic who hasn't touched a drink in 30 years is still an alcoholic--and he may even be tempted at times to take a drink--however, in his heart and in his actions he chooses to say "No" to alcohol and walk the path of sobriety.
A person commits sin when he willfully gives his mind over to sinful thoughts or engages in sin--not because he is tempted by the sin. Sin, and temptation to sin, are two different things.
Does that mean it's then sin or temptation (concupiscence)? I need to finish reading "Theology of the Body." I regret now not ever taking theology in college lol.
I
ETA: we are all broken in some way, in this fallen world. And we all have a cross to bear. The point is to follow Him who gave us the perfect example on how to carry our crosses and battle against sin. The power of Christ's Cross is truly redemptive.
I've not been involved in this conversation, but thank you @Galadriel for your clear explanation. {ASIDE: have you considered being a writer? Your posts are always so eloquent and well-presented - I personally think you're gifted!}
The way I see it, regardless of whether or not one was 'born that way' (regarding any ungoldy proclivity, not just homosexuality), God is the One who made the world by speaking, and made a man out of dust, then a woman out of bone, then went on to open dead wombs and make a virgin conceive. He raises people from the dead, and Jesus said the all things are possible to those who believe. In my view of things, God is able to re-order every disorder, no matter how it came about.
Our Lord Christ cast out demons and has the Name above every name! The one time in the Bible that Jesus didn't do many miracles was in His hometown, because of their unbelief. I'm not one of those name-it-and-claim-it people, but the Bible is clear that a little faith goes a long way, and it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. If people don't believe that God can deliver them, it's unlikely they'll ask Him for it.
In Jeremiah, God says He's the God of ALL flesh, then He asks if there's anything too hard for Him. I always thought that was a rhetorical question, but maybe it's not - maybe it's for each individual to answer. Thanks again for your post, I really appreciate it. Have a good weekend!
Tis very true but you know we catholics also are very partial to plain, common sense. I know that G-d is capable but He might not be willing to remove the affliction in some persons and that would not be due to lack of faith. I also would be very wary of linking myself in marriage to a former homosexual because of the likelihood of temptation. From reading the CCC, it seems to be more aligned with encouraging them to remain chaste and celibate as they work out their salvation.
---------------
ETA: I mean that if concupiscence is "strong sexual desire/lust," then is it more sin or is it more temptation or just plain inclination due to the definition and inclusion of "lust?" When we see "lust" in the textbook definition, it seems to be pointing to sin. I'm thinking of the two inclinations in man and how they balance each other out (yetzer hara and yetzer hatov). Actually, I guess the catholic definition is basically the same. It surely isn't a puritan definition.
I see where you're coming from because some of this depends on each person's level of affliction and how he/she responds to God's offer of grace.
I do believe a person can lean on God's sanctifying grace to keep his particular concupiscence in check--heck, even as a married straight woman, I have a duty to keep mine in check and remain faithful to my husband, right? So yes, God's grace can keep us on the right path, especially when we willingly surrender to His grace. However, there are those who are deeply afflicted, where they are not cooperating with God's grace (or at least not fully) and they fall into a constant cycle of indulgence and sin--think of people who are addicted to porn, studies have shown that viewing pornography literally changes your brain chemistry and gives you a euphoric high like taking a drug. A person who indulges in sexual sin is making it harder for himself to escape it because it's addictive. I think the group of people you're talking about @kanozas (those who struggle with deep-seated homosexual desires) may fall into that category, because it's so deeply ingrained.
Yes!! All the more reason to comprehend that we do not know the genesis of it other than it being seriously disordered nature. I think that accepting or cooperating with G-d's grace might mean coming under celibacy and not necessarily being "cured." I guess it depends upon G-d's will for that person. But for those who were not abused and were young children with this deep-seated inclination, they did not arrive at this by chemical change from exposure (my guess). IMO, those would be the ones who were born of this nature (congenital chemical brain aberrations). Shrugs...who knows for sure. That's why I am obedient to the CCC in not condemning people to hell for merely having the inclination. Mental illness (brain chemistry that is awry) can also be congenital. But alas...
OOOPs....I forgot...but it's hard to just stop discussing something like this when you are trying to arrive at some understanding. I don't think they like this topic. I'll quit my participation now.
Yes, and I think it's important to distinguish what you (and the Catechism) are saying about the person being afflicted with this and someone who is trying to argue "born this way, therefore natural and good." Some people are afflicted with schizophrenia, but we don't call it natural or good. Some people are afflicted with alcoholism, or a certain neurosis, but we don't call them natural or good. For some reason when it comes to sexual morality, people lose their minds and claim there are no rules and no morals attached.
Speaking just on behalf of my own musings and no one else's, I think people are afflicted with deep-seated homosexual desires due to a mixture of environment, experience (like abuse/sexual exposure), and/or a disordered sexual proclivity due to being in a fallen world and having imperfect bodies. Scientifically, we have not discovered any "gay gene," so I don't believe someone is directly genetically coded to be gay, but some people are susceptible to these desires because of our fallen natures.
@kanozasTis very true but you know we catholics also are very partial to plain, common sense.
I know that G-d is capable but He might not be willing to remove the affliction in some persons and that would not be due to lack of faith. I also would be very wary of linking myself in marriage to a former homosexual because of the likelihood of temptation. From reading the CCC, it seems to be more aligned with encouraging them to remain chaste and celibate as they work out their salvation.
---------------
ETA: I mean that if concupiscence is "strong sexual desire/lust," then is it more sin or is it more temptation or just plain inclination due to the definition and inclusion of "lust?" When we see "lust" in the textbook definition, it seems to be pointing to sin. I'm thinking of the two inclinations in man and how they balance each other out (yetzer hara and yetzer hatov). Actually, I guess the catholic definition is basically the same. It surely isn't a puritan definition.
Keeping the families of those slain in Orlando in the past 48 hours in prayer. When we see these things happen:
“Pray, then, in this way:
‘Our Father who is in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
Your kingdom come,
Your will be done
On earth as it is in heaven.
‘Give us this day our daily bread.
‘And forgive us our debts, as we have forgiven our debtors [letting go of both the wrong and the resentment].
‘And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from evil. [For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.]’ - Matt 6:9-13 (AMP)