I knew that some people had problems when black people claim to be part NA, white, etc. but now there's a problem when people claim to be 100% black too?
Which one is it? Are we supposed to claim the 1/64 Scottish part of us or not?
We can't have it both ways.
I'm confused too.
How can we jump on the three black women in that segment for calling themselves 'all black' and 100% AA
and then jump on board members or African Americans in general for saying they are black but not purely of African descent??
It basically comes down to what Tyra, in her poor deluded anti-intellectual shallow way, was trying to get at; that you can't neatly label people by appearance and people's identities don't neatly line up according to parentage, lineage or "blood".
Cuz it sounds like people are saying light/fair people aren't allowed to have a black only identity, regardless of family and heritage and culture, and medium to dark folks can't have a mixed or multi-whatever identity (or really even speak of any ancestry that isn't African) regardless of how they see themselves.
There is no formula that dictates what person goes in which box.
This isn't like classifying plants or animal species and domesticated breeds, humans rely on culture and social constructs to bring order and meaning to their lives and it shapes each of our realities but it not a science, its not exact, its not set in stone.
Its silly to try and dictate percentages and fractions or proximity of ancestry/family that someone must have to identify a certain way.
A person of mixed parentage can choose to identify with only one side and someone of mixed ancestry can identify with the part of who they are that they don't resemble (or kind of a composite identity which AA basically is if one looks at our history arc. mixture doesn't exclude folks) or as mixed even if they don't fit the stereotype.
As far as I care people can make up bs about their background. What they eat doesn't make me... ahem
and I have no right to tell them how they ought to see themselves (plus I don't believe on holding on to folks that take no pride in the heritage we have in common, one should be xyz because it means something and is worth something to you not because you feel society gives you no other choice. I'm proud of who I am and my background and people like that irritate me and I tend to view them as dead weight honestly.)
imo the problem with Jenna isn't her identifying as white, but her thinking to be white she must be a racist and a bigot towards blacks. If I were white and in the audience I'd be mad that her attempt to connect to that side consisted of being a low class, redneck, racist stereotype.
Not having an ambiguous look just makes her look more of a cringe-worthy fool with her flag and her hood