JFemme
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
BlackCardinal said:
I've seen folks get pretty riled up about this idea and I just don't get it.
When a person with relaxed hair says they want healthy hair, they have a particular goal in mind. They know how they want it to look and feel and behave. They describe that condition as healthy. They aren't even thinking about the molecular level. You don't see/interact with your hair at a molecular level--you just deal with the overall condition and appearance. Even someone with natural hair isn't concerned about what's going on at the molecular level. They still guage the success of their hair regimen by how their hair looks, feels, and behaves. They just have different references.
You can argue til the cows come home about what is "truly" healthy, but the truth is nobody really cares unless it is affecting their ability to reach their appearance goals. And what exactly does healthy mean anyway? As it was posted earlier: "The overall condition of something: the general condition of something in terms of soundness, vitality, and proper functioning" That's a pretty relative definition when it comes to hair. People have different ideas of what it means for their hair to "function properly." And when people do try to describe what healthy is, what kinds of things to they say? All having to do with how it looks, feels, and behaves. People have their own ideal characteristics and that's what they aim for. Having your sulfide bonds intact isn't always directly related to your appearance goals.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't get it either... Blk Cardinal ~~ you have your mom's sense of diplomacy and tact which summed up my thoughts exactly..
BlackCardinal said:
I've seen folks get pretty riled up about this idea and I just don't get it.
When a person with relaxed hair says they want healthy hair, they have a particular goal in mind. They know how they want it to look and feel and behave. They describe that condition as healthy. They aren't even thinking about the molecular level. You don't see/interact with your hair at a molecular level--you just deal with the overall condition and appearance. Even someone with natural hair isn't concerned about what's going on at the molecular level. They still guage the success of their hair regimen by how their hair looks, feels, and behaves. They just have different references.
You can argue til the cows come home about what is "truly" healthy, but the truth is nobody really cares unless it is affecting their ability to reach their appearance goals. And what exactly does healthy mean anyway? As it was posted earlier: "The overall condition of something: the general condition of something in terms of soundness, vitality, and proper functioning" That's a pretty relative definition when it comes to hair. People have different ideas of what it means for their hair to "function properly." And when people do try to describe what healthy is, what kinds of things to they say? All having to do with how it looks, feels, and behaves. People have their own ideal characteristics and that's what they aim for. Having your sulfide bonds intact isn't always directly related to your appearance goals.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't get it either... Blk Cardinal ~~ you have your mom's sense of diplomacy and tact which summed up my thoughts exactly..
