I have done a lot of thinking on the matter, and I’ve come to the conclusion that in dating, there are Mattys and there are Jakes. There are Gales and there are Peetas. There are Bigs and there are Aidans. And popular culture always wants us to think we should go with the former. They want us to think it’s more exciting, it’s more passionate, and the pain ultimately gives you more pleasure.
Fortunately, I’ve decided I reject that dichotomy. In a testament of growth that I am truly proud of, I am now sure that I would choose the Jake, the Peeta, and the Aidan. A guy is not lesser because he is emotionally available. A guy is not sexier because he is aloof and inconsiderate and distant. A guy is not soft, weak, or undesirable because he can be sweet or sensitive. Frankly, the guy who offers you his love deserves you more than the guy who makes you earn it. And we can all thank Suzanne Collins for this, because Peeta being the best imaginary boyfriend ever has worked like nothing before to convince me that I no longer want to deal with jerks that make me guess how they feel about me.
Only initially, and only vaguely, did I have concerns about TV’s version of that “spark.” I find that the “spark” people always associate with passionate relationships is, a lot of the time, based in fear and insecurity. Fear that he might leave you, fear that he’ll cheat on you, fear that he doesn’t love you. (God I hope that isn’t a direct quote from Sex and the City but I’m sensing it’s related.) I wondered if I was “sparking” enough with Dean like I had with other guys. For example, I’d say I sparked with Colin Farrell. But, we didn’t know anything about each other and had basically had only hooked up a couple times and had a good time – how can you not spark with that? That is the essence of sparking. I was used to short-lived but intense intimacy that never lasted long term. Most of the other guys I’d dated, I knew for years, most since junior high. After the end of my long-term FWB situation in college, I had to, for the first time, step into the real world of dating, without any screening filters or built-in accessibility. One of finding and meeting complete strangers and starting from zero and getting off the ground from scratch. So I felt as if my previous experiences would not be applicable. I was doing neither of those things now, and I could not judge the trajectory of the relationship based on either of those things.
I liked Dean. I felt I had a very good idea of him from our long conversations, which was then confirmed as genuine in person. He was thoughtful and well-read. He was happy (he’s one of those people you would describe as “cheerful”), well-adjusted, and had come from a loving family. Respectful, chivalrous, polite. He was intellectually curious and our conversations were always interesting and explorative. Even though technically my sphere of knowledge is probably bigger than his, I found myself a lot of the time deferring back to his opinions; usually I’m a know it all but he had spheres of knowledge that were different from mine, and neither of us were one up on the other. Physically, I was attracted to him – he was cute facially, I loved his dark coloring and thick black hair, and he felt solid, sturdy, manly to me. He was sweet, kind, and considerate – three things that would not have necessarily been on my dream guy list several years ago but are now recognized for their value. The one that got me the most, though, was that he was super supportive and encouraging. There was something about him that made me feel safe – like he would have my back, like he would be there for me, like he would hold me up if I were falling down. He felt reliable; he felt present to me in a way that a lot of men have felt absent.
I liked that things between Dean and I were able to flourish naturally. Just like when he first contacted me and I didn’t immediately fall all over myself over him, a lot of my preconceived notions and expectations were slowly unraveling the more time we spent together. I do say this in hindsight, of course. However, that’s how it was – a little bit of the path was illuminated step by step, and none of my thoughts were set in stone.
Well, anyway. So Dean and I made plans to catch a movie the next weekend. He would pick me up from my sister’s again and we’d take it from there. Nothing much was playing, so I made the executive decision to see In Time, that random movie starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried, chatting somewhat nervously while we stood in line. We had to get assigned seats for the theater (lulz) and when I complained about not having the choice of whether to sit next to people, they assigned us to two handicapped seats set apart from the others (lulz again). He complimented the sparkly barrette I’d pinned in my hair at the last minute to add a little color to my outfit. He held my hand. And the movie was really good, I thought, in the same general vein as that insipid Inception but without any of the accolades (when, in my opinion, it was far superior, though Dean thought the symbolism was very heavy handed. It was, but I didn’t mind).
That’s only burned up about two hours, and we don’t want the date to end yet. We have no idea what to get into next, so we decide to try to find a BYOB restaurant since I accidentally forgot to grab an ID. Granted, we didn’t try very hard, and ended up leaving the drinks in the car and sitting at a gazebo near the skyline sitting facing each other with our legs overlapping. We basically spent about an hour playing tonsil hockey before we got so cold that we had to leave.
Dean, by the way, is very into my body. He thinks I am “hot” and “sexy” which is hilarious because I am so beyond thinking of myself in those terms that I forget men still do. Also, most men never seem as attuned to all the little imperfections we stress over. You’re like oh I’m so fat and gross right now, but they’re all grabbing and clutching at your feminine lady parts like they’re such a fantastic sight to behold, getting a kick out of smelling you and slipping their fingers in your hair. But yes, it is very gratifying to be dating a man who is into you in that way. Like Paula Patton and Robin Thicke – Robin Thicke is so into Paula Patton. (I saw him on TMZ the other day and they asked him if he’d rather lose the sense of taste or the sense of touch, and he’s like “Idk, my wife tastes and feels pretty good” and I was totally kvetching, like, nobody even asked him about his wife.)
That being said, it was pretty clear, both physically and verbally, that Dean was interested in having sex. I was not (ready, not interested), largely because I just didn’t want to think about it yet. It was not that I was opposed to having sex with him for any moral or strategic reason… The extent of my thoughts on it was simply that I didn’t want it on the table yet. I didn’t want to consider the who, what, when, and where, and as long as it wasn’t on the table, I wouldn’t bother with it, and if it did come up, then I’d deal with it then. Poor planning, yes, I know. I probably could have thought about it a little more than that and came up with a better plan but I wasn’t sure what I thought yet or what I wanted to happen yet.
This is the thing about meeting online, or rather, using okcupid in particular, you can get a lot of views and opinions out of your partner that they might not necessarily share outright. This way, I knew what to expect in a lot of ways from him sexually. For example…
And just for kicks (lol):
So, you know, it's something to grow on.
Anyway, so back at the car, Dean tells me that his roommate is going to be out of town for the weekend and invites me to spend the weekend at his place. I am concerned about this because obviously he is attracted to me, and I don’t want there to be any pressure to have sex, because I am not ready for that yet (and either way I certainly don’t want to feel pressured to do it regardless). I expressed this to him, and he said that sex is not a requirement for the weekend and he totally understands. I am still not sold, and tell him I’ll think about it when he drops me off.