Yeah that movie thing (tomboy bff turning into ultimate love interest) has a lot of women disappointed. I can't even count the number of women who have taken the stance, "If I be a good friend, then he will realize he likes me,"...um no. More likely if you be a good friend he may eventually have sex with you or settle with you. It happened to me. I had a guy friend who later wanted to date.
Curse those Hollywood romantic comedies!!!!
LOL!
How dare they fool women everywhere! The one that
really did women a disservice was that movie "He's Just Not That Into You". All through the movie the guy kept telling the main girl that if a guy isn't doing x, y, z then he's just not into you. Well, at the end of the movie in turns out the guy WAS interested in the girl, so then it's like you spend the whole movie hearing you're not the exceptiong you're the rule, but at the end of the movie the girl turned out to be the "exception"... ARRRRGH!!! So confusing!
It's like, they can't have it be like real life where it just DOESN'T work out in the end lol.
Early on in dating I figured out it's never good when I have an immediate extreme reaction to a man when I meet him. It's better when I'm like "he's ok." Obviously if I have a negative reaction, then it's not going to happen LOL. But if I'm totally ga-ga over a guy at first glance that's not good either. Studies show romantic feelings blind us to that person's faults. So if you're ga-ga for someone at the beginning you might miss some potential deal breakers that come back to bite you later. That's definitely happened to women I know.
YES....I have figured that out too.
If I have an instant attraction reaction to a man when I FIRST meet him, it's NEVER a good sign.
Plus, I find that I always end up acting weird or nervous around him because I'm too attracted lol.
I find it better when the guy is nice, not bad looking, but I'm more so indifferent to him ("he's cool"..."he's a fun guy", "he's alright") as opposed to "OH EM GEE Becky... I want to have his babies!!
)
. Whereas with men, don't they have to be feeling like "OMG....I want HER NOW..." from jump in order to even want to START something with you???
I guess that's how men and women are different I guess.
#shrug
@
Crystalicequeen123
Just want to make sure you got my PM. With the new system, I'm not able to see if I actually sent it. No rush, just wanted to make sure.
Hey! Yes girl I got it!! I read it and boy do I have a LOT to say lol. It's going to take me a while to respond. Maybe when I get some downtime at work lol.
Have you ladies her this?
They say women have two ladders. A guy is either on the friends ladder or the potential S/O ladder. (And I personally believe that women are likely to give a "friend" a chance and move them to the S/O ladder).
Men also have two ladders (this is my spin on it). One is women they would marry and the other ladder is everyone else...and they will have sex with anyone from either ladder. But I think it hardly ever happens that women move from the "everyone else" ladder to the wife one. They will be with someone for years, have kids with them etc. and still not relocate them to the wife ladder.
Ahhhh yes.... The "Ladder Theory". Yes, I've heard of this , and I think it's pretty much accurate as well.
Although, the theory is that men only have ONE ladder, and women have 2. Meaning, a woman has a seperate ladder for guys who she ONLY views as friends and would never ever in her life get with.
And of course one ladder for guys who are "potentials" or guys she would DEFINITELY go with.
Whereas men say that they only have ONE ladder, meaning, they have women on a totem pole. Ones they really want to be with/sleep with are way at the top, and the ones they aren't that attracted to are down below. But they say that if a woman were to change up her appearance somewhat (ie. better dresser, lost weight, looking good, etc), she can actually move
UP the ladder! Or if things don't work out with the woman at the top, another woman can move on up lol. Hence, why men always swear that don't really put women in the "friendzone"
because they may still sleep with you if they are drunk enough or haven't had any, or you've changed up your look, etc.
But with women, it seems that either the man was her "potential" ladder or he wasn't. If a guy changes up his look, it doesn't matter lol.
I think that's because women go by more than just LOOKS when looking at and assessing a guy. If a man is going to make a bad bf, or isn't confident, or doesn' thave the qualities a woman is looking for, it doesn't matter how much he changes up his "look", he's still not in the "relationship worthy" category for a woman lol.