firecracker said:I gotcha in other words "nothing beats a failure but a try". I didn't think you were being negative or militant.
I hadn't quite heard it that way before but YES!!!!
firecracker said:I gotcha in other words "nothing beats a failure but a try". I didn't think you were being negative or militant.
RelaxerRehab said:At 10 years old you wouldn't think it was that deep, either. I didn't think so at 7 years old. I was thinking about baby dolls (thank God that's all I had to think about....I had a healthy childhood). Same thing with you as me: it wasn't a personal choice. I think relaxing should be a personal, conscious choice.
And I never said that all black women have (the same) issues about their hair. This board is evidence that women of color and hair issues cross a wide spectrum. If it was "just hair", then this board would have fewer (paid) members....
caligurl said:I agree that relaxing should be a choice made by someone when they are older.
As far as women at the board, I came here because I wanted tips on styles and how to take care of my hair. There are tips on this site that I never even heard of like pin curls. That was actually why I came to this board. I'm a paid member because I like to post questions and get feedback.
You equated ever being natural with not ever leaving your home town. If you want to stay in your home town then stay. I've traveled, but I'm never living anywhere else, but Cali... I like the sunny weather. There is nothing wrong with that. You don't have to explore if you don't want to. Some people are like where they are and they don't need to explore to prove that.
Well I guess I am an odd exception to what you have experienced. I don't try to prove anything to anyone nor recruit... And about checking birthdates and such, I've never gotten into doing all that. Plus, I never notice a lot of posts that refer to proving they can grow long hair or trying to recruit people to go natural. Yes I've seen posts like that but I don't go checking to see how old they are. So you're right, I don't ntoice the pattern...I guess we tend focus more or less of our attention on different topics or issues. I'm sure there are some 30 year olds and older trying to prove something or recruit as well....ones that you may have overlooked because I'm sure you don't check everyone's birthday. Just a thought.JCoily said:I'm going to hold firm here. I very rarely read posts from 30+ women whose entire day/week/transition was ruined by folks talking about their hair regardless of hair type. BTW - <I will admit, I check birthdates when I read some posts so that I can get a better idea of what I'm dealing with.>
BTW - I believe age factors into hair goals across the board regardless of hair type. I haven't read many entries where older women on the board say that they are embarking on their haircare journey to 'prove to everyone that black women can grow hair'. Nope, that line tends to come from the youngsters. Why? Cause these are the folks who haven't learned yet that it's not about proving something to other people.
Are there exceptions to the rule. Yep, but an exception is not the norm. I belong to other hair boards and I know that you are too. You don't notice a pattern between the folks who feel a burning need to recruit new nappies (misery loves company, or 'let's feel persecuted together') and the folks who are laissez faire about being naturals. Check the birthdates for your answer.
Yep, the society's standard of beauty as well as one's personal feelings, thoughts, and emotions play a role in having natural or relaxed hair.Sarafina said:I had no idea there would be so many honest answers. Thanks for taking the time to respond to the post. I'm pleasantly surprised by how many different turns the discussion took.
I still do think some of us have it easier to be natural than others simply because of society's standards. But at the same time, how you personally feel about yourself affects your ability to be natural (regardless of texture, geography, age, etc.)
Personally, I think my problem was with length more so than anything else. If I could have switched natural hair for the length I had relaxed (or even now, when I'm texlaxed/texturized) I would have done it in a heartbeat--shrinkage included. So I'm thinking now that I won't relax but keep my hair in braids for another year so I don't have to deal with it in school.
Country gal said:It's all in the attitude. If you have an attitude that doesn't concern itself with other's opinion, confidence and style, than you can sport natural hair.
I don't have loose 3 c curls. My hair shrinks and doesn't grow south except in the back. I work my natural hair and sport it like I am a hair model.
pretty_nappy_hair said:"See, I live in Southern California and my perception is that a toned body trumps a hairstyle any day."
I 100% agree with this.
RelaxerRehab said:Hmmm... my apologies for missing this post.... You begin your response with understanding where I'm coming from and end with an opposing reference to my mention of pity.... Please allow me to clarify that point:
Of course there are PLENTY of issues around the world that deserve our compassion. Please let's keep this conversation in the context of this forum.
I do feel pity (defined as sympathy and sorrow aroused by the misfortune or suffering of another) for those people who may only know life with only relaxed hair because they would not have the opportunity to experience their hair in its full natural state. I do pity someone who got their hair relaxed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 years old (like me at 7 years old) because that straight hair mentality gets programed into the mind at such an early age. It is that same programming says that my hair in its natural state is unworthy, and that simply is untrue.
So I do not apologize for my statements, and that is why I advocate the conscious decision to relax at an age-appropriate time. And as was said in this thread, everyone should go through at least one transition to natural so that they can have that experience and that should they decide to relax again, they are doing so with a conscious mind.
caltron said:I seem to get more down to earth guys to approach me now. Before it seemed the guys were pretty superficial. I seemed to attract a lot of teenaged boys. The men who approach me now seem more mature.
caligurl said:I disagree with you on two points. One: I was relaxed at age 10, but not because I was programmed to believe that kinky hair was bad. Honestly at 10 I don't think I was that deep. I was relaxed because it was my mothers choice not mine. Just like I couldn't decide what to wear until I was 12. My mother is natural by the way.
Two: I don't agree that everyone should be natural once. If you don't want to be natural don't be natural. There is nothing wrong with a person preferring straight hair.
I myself have been relaxed, natural, blond, a red head, had a weave, braids, etc. Hair is an accessory... an extension of how I feel that day. I feel like your reading way too much into this issue. Maybe I just don't have the issues that you think all black women have. It is just hair! I think there a lot of women who also feel this way.
ETA: That's interesting. as much as it might have been a pain for you, its great that your mother went to lengths to keep you from looking grown. I see more than a few young people who could use a mother like that.dicapr said:I just have one more point. The assumption is that many relaxed heads never got a chance to learn to love or accept their virgin hair before relaxing. For me, and certainly others on the board, we were of age and sound mind when the decision to relax was made. My mother wouldn't even straighten my hair until I was 12 years old! I went to middle school rocking my natural hair. I was teased, but I felt it was because the style was babyish. I was 5'3'' and wearing a bra with cornrows (no extentions). When my mom finially blowdried my hair somewhat straight at age 12 I thought I looked strange with straight hair. My mom wouldn't let me wear anything but 1 or 2 ponytails in order to keep me looking like "a little girl" because I was developed for my age. I think I was almost 13 years old before I ever wore my hair out. I never disliked my natural hair. When it was pressed, my schoolmates would touch my ponytails and be amazed about how soft the texture was. I enjoyed wash day. I liked seeing my hair curl and shrink up. If I'd known about LHCF then, I might have tried some gel to see if the curls would have stayed. My mother made me learn to care for my virgin hair before she would let me relax. I learned to plait (never could braid), wash, condition, and press my hair. For me, finially getting a relaxer at 16 1/2 was a sign of maturity. My mother had finially decided that was old enough to make a decision about my own haircare. She warned me that relaxed hair required TLC. Getting a relaxer was was equated with wearing makeup-that happened at 16 also. My mom was very old fashioned.
RelaxerRehab said:Thank you for responding.... I didn't say it was completely impossible for a relaxed person to appreciate natural hair, but you do confirm my point about the contradictory nature that can occur in a conversation when a relaxed person attempts to encourage an appreciation of natural hair....
lauren450 said:OK, then I must not have been clear. I meant I understand that you may think it sounds contradictory, but that I don't think it is at all. It's not like I'm telling my neice she shouldn't relax because relaxers are evil and whatnot. I don't think that way. I'm telling her that relaxers don't make her beautiful, and that straight hair doesn't make her beautiful, nor does straight hair=pretty hair.
If anyone thinks it's contradictory for a relaxed person to appeciate natural hair, then they're way too militant and closed-minded for me.
lauren450 said:OK, then I must not have been clear. I meant I understand that you may think it sounds contradictory, but that I don't think it is at all. It's not like I'm telling my neice she shouldn't relax because relaxers are evil and whatnot. I don't think that way. I'm telling her that relaxers don't make her beautiful, and that straight hair doesn't make her beautiful, nor does straight hair=pretty hair.
If anyone thinks it's contradictory for a relaxed person to appeciate natural hair, then they're way too militant and closed-minded for me.
Or like religion, I can be a Catholic and still see the beauty of denominations/religions that other people choose to follow. If another Catholic says--- ewww she's a Baptist! As a Catholic, I'm not being a hypocrite by saying, there's nothing wrong with being Baptist-- even though neither one of us chooses to practice that faith. Your choice to be Catholic doesn't mean you think there is anything inherently wrong with being Baptist-- it is just what feels right for you. To me, its just choosing something, yet remaining open-minded about other things out there.
Sistaslick said:I agree. Just because you choose to do one thing and appreciate others who choose to do another--doesn't mean you are being hypocritical. And just because you can see the beauty in one choice (though its not your own), or want to tell others there is beauty in other choices too doesn't mean you are wrong.
I don't see it as a "do as I say, not as I do" thing b/c you are not telling the other person to do anything. You are just pointing out that there is nothing wrong with someone who makes either choice and showing them to be more open minded about the other choices out there. I believe that you can respect or appreciate something, without choosing it for yourself. Like if someone thinks there's nothing wrong with someone choosing/being gay-- but not being gay themselves. Or like religion, I can be a Catholic and still see the beauty of denominations/religions that other people choose to follow. If another Catholic says--- ewww she's a Baptist! As a Catholic, I'm not being a hypocrite by saying, there's nothing wrong with being Baptist-- even though neither one of us chooses to practice that faith. Your choice to be Catholic doesn't mean you think there is anything inherently wrong with being Baptist-- it is just what feels right for you. To me, its just choosing something, yet remaining open-minded about other things out there.
Sistaslick said:I don't see it as a "do as I say, not as I do" thing b/c you are not telling the other person to do anything.
As I previously stated, one may not express such sentiments with their words, but those messages may come forth very strong through their actions.
You are just pointing out that there is nothing wrong with someone who makes either choice and showing them to be more open minded about the other choices out there. I believe that you can respect or appreciate something, without choosing it for yourself.
Like if someone thinks there's nothing wrong with someone choosing/being gay-- but not being gay themselves. Or like religion, I can be a Catholic and still see the beauty of denominations/religions that other people choose to follow. If another Catholic says--- ewww she's a Baptist! As a Catholic, I'm not being a hypocrite by saying, there's nothing wrong with being Baptist-- even though neither one of us chooses to practice that faith. Your choice to be Catholic doesn't mean you think there is anything inherently wrong with being Baptist-- it is just what feels right for you. To me, its just choosing something, yet remaining open-minded about other things out there.
With regard to appreciation, there's a fine line between tolerance and celebration. Using your example concerning sexual preferences and/or religious preferences: one may TOLERATE differing views by not speaking or acting against them. I would not call that appreciation. When one has an APPRECIATION, a CELEBRATION for such preferences, they demonstrate that appreciation and celebration through their ACTIONS, e.g., directing resources toward such organizations that support associated issues, supporting certain products and services and boycotting other products and services that do not support LBGT causes and/or religious-affiliated entities.
JCoily said:That was me.
Here's the thing. Consider this: Ananda Lewis, Chili from TLC, Tatiana Ali, Kelis, Rachel True. Let's be really real here, Are these women known for their good looks/talent or for their hair? I don't think any of them would would get looked at twice if their hair wasn't outside the 'expectations' of 'typical' (i.e., permed or kinky) black girl hair.
I'm not saying that it's right or wrong. I'm just saying that 'it is'.
RelaxerRehab said:Words are cheap. Actions speak louder than words.
Sistaslick said:I'm still not seeing how you HAVE to be natural to respect or appreciate the choice to natural.
That's why I was saying that for somebody who sincerely wants to be an advocate for natural hair should at least go through the experience of wearing their hair natural in order to have their own real-time personal experience. It's not saying that one who has only known their hair relaxed can't respect the natural hair option, but I'm saying that the mirror image of this point in that THE ACTION OF THE NATURAL HAIR EXPERIENCE MATTERS.
lauren450 said:I understand what your saying, but it doesn't really apply to my situation. I wasn't trying to celebrate natural hair or advocate it, but I wanted my niece to know that natural hair isn't ugly and neither is she if she misses her scheduled relaxer.
So, I agree with your points, just not in relation to my situation.
hopeful said:Wow Lauren, you tell her hair isn't ugly and you don't try to celebrate natural hair, and you expect her to appreciate her nappy roots. IMHO she needs to be told that her natural hair is beautiful just like her and that her natural hair is a gift from God. IMHO she needs to be told that she is beautiful either way, whether natural or relaxed. Maybe that is what you are saying or maybe it isn't, but you certainly don't sound like you really like natural hair at all. And that's fine and your business. But IMHO it's like saying you encourage children to do well in school by telling them they are not dumb and that you don't celebrate education. That is not very convincing or motivating.
lauren450 said:???Did you read my earlier posts? I thought I clearly stated that I thought natural hair was beautiful, and that I had talked to my niece about this. My point was, I wasn't trying to get her to go natural (I'm relaxed and have no problem with relaxed hair), but that I hate the attitude that naps are ugly and must be done away with at the first opportunity. I also said that I told her that she is beautiful, etc.