Littlegoldlamb, I loved your post too. And I do understand that it isn't easy to change a way of thinking passed on down the generations, just like it isn't easy to change the way I see the word coz for 75%+ of my life, it was never used that way. And when I compare lamb's wool or sheep's wool to springs, then wool is way softer than metal or plastic. Also until recent years, I used to apply 19879874 things to my hair and I would never have called my hair soft. It wasn't until I almost went w/o anything in my hair that its true nature came out. So if nappy meant coarse hair, then wasn't that a fair/honest view with respect to the hair that white folks were used to?
I agree. Unfortunately they used it as proof we weren't human, verses just different. Then as proof of a lesser moral character. That's the sad part.
Either way, I really can't think of them having taken the trouble to study our hair to describe it in the full spectrum that black hair comes in. It was made of tight coils, reminded them of sheep's skin, and it was...er...er...how you say...nappy!
I know, right? Again, however, they used as a means to injure and subjugate. Sigh.
As for TD Jakes kid worrying about being darker, I got the impression that being in a predominantly white school and the neighborhood he grew up in, he's been fed the lie that light is better than dark...not unlike teenage kids that are brainwashed by images of skinny, lanky models who look like skeletons into thinking that's what one has to be to be beautiful. I don't know if the article was posted on the forum, but I'll try to find it and give the link if you didn't see it.
I've written papers about skinny models, lol.This "impression" I'm finding is the case with many. Let me tell you from experience that if you go to a predominately white school (and I did so ALL over the country) I don't care HOW light you are -you're not "white" and that's all that matters. It's funny only Blacks think light skinned Blacks are "readily" accepted by non-Blacks. erplexed Another thing we need to conquer TOGETHER as a people, no?
I don't know if black was always bad. I seem to recall the darker you are the more beautiful you were considered in the Gambia.
I did mention that wasn't the case EVERYWHERE. Thank GOD!
And while I will admit I've heard people who are light skinned being called beautiful, even in Kenya when they really were just plain, I have NEVER fallen into that way of thinking. To me dark skin always looked beautiful because it was always flawless. I even tried to darken my skin by going on tanning beds, and buying tanning creams--and I'm not at all high yellow. It is this obsession with dark skin that has me in awe of Alek Wek. So when I ask when did dark become bad, I honest to God have always thought of it as absolutely beautiful. Even back when I was superficial and thought looks were everything, I'd not date anyone that was light-skinned. I even remember one very sweet guy that was high-yella whose personality I adored but he was too light for me so he didn't stand a chance.
If I'm being purely superficial I like my men like my coffee: Dark, sweet...and RICH!
So while I do know about say India and how even w/in families the dark children are considered something to hide and be ashamed of, I have never been able to grasp that way of thinking coz I have always admired dark skin. I remember even envying people who had dark knuckles and wished mine didn't match my fingers!
I used to the "tomato" example just to be funny. I do realize it's a pronunciation thing and not as deep as this word nappy offends some people. But from my point of view, because the word has no offensive meaning at all, using it or not using it is as much one's choice and as innocent as calling a boot a trunk, a bonnet a hood.... It's all just the same thing but we each use the word we're comfortable with. Doesn't make the other person wrong for using that word.
I understand and agree with this too. I just like to go a step beyond by monitoring how others are affected by it and by it's historical usage verses just MEANING alone. As most people Black and non-Black know its usage not its TRUE meaning.
Just means we describe the same thing by the word we are most comfortable using. So that's the point I was trying to make.
I hear ya'.
Some may call their hair curly or coily, I will call mine kinky and nappy and curly and coily and all will be well in my world. I love language and love that there are so many words to describe the same thing so I treasure the knowledge and peace of mind I have that nappy means kinky which means tightly curled. English is my third language so I tend to not give words more meaning than their definitions.
This explains alot. I also study linguistics (college student) and English has an unusual dependency on connotation. So much so, we use MANY (by we I mean native speakers, especially those who ONLY speak English) words COMPLETELY out of context and meaning and are actually CONFUSED and INSULTED when they are used by their proper definition.
But I really do understand those who can't help but feel bitterness at the sound of that word. If I am ever around those of you who cringe at the word and I know or remember, I will try to be sensitive and not use the word when speaking to you, especially if describing your hair.
That's all that matters -we've got to <3 each other! I'm going to start with <3ing Nonie for her great, thought-provoking posts!
It is humbling and sad to hear the insults you had to endure. I was bullied in school but only coz I was a softy and a nerd. But it was never about my appearance, so I cannot think of words that were used to describe me that hurt me deeply. The bullying I endured in school was just mean girls threatening to beat me up or withdraw their friendship <-- a gift I treasured more than anything else in the world, even if it was of such poor quality. It seems like a joke in the light of what you had to endure but for a kid like me, it hurt deeply and always brought me to tears. And everyone had nappy hair so there wasn't anything worth writing home about there, unless it was long when we all just oohed and aahed.
Anyway, glad we had this chat.
DITTO.
And no, I don't think all light-skinned people think like that. Just like I know there are people who will never go natural not because they simply love their hair relaxed but because God forbid their natural nappy hair should ever show.
I used to be like that a year ago. Then I BCed, went natural (more accurately STAYED natural and didn't relax ) and blew my little lambie mind! This was due to all the negativity I received from family and friends about my looks -"Ethnic" features plus random (For my family's "color norm") light skin meant I was some kind of mistake, joke, or what have you. People need to keep their issues to themselves, no? Some of them make me want to temporarily set aside my more gentle nature.
And then there are people who are so anti-relaxers that they almost become insulting to those who relax.
I almost became that kind of natural. One extreme to another.
To me hair is just hair...and if I didn't enjoy my natural hair as much as I do, I'd have no problem relaxing. And it wouldn't be because I'm trying to be something I'm not.
I'm right >>>here<<< with you on this. On my one-year nappiversary I will decide to stay natural...or do whatever I want to do to have the look I want. It's FINALLY just hair to me. It feels so good!
Heck, it's me becoming all the things I can be coz my hair is ALL THAT and bag of chips.
Napps rock! A few races can only wish they could sport half the dos I can.