So....let me get this straight....
Men can go to war facing enemy lines, compete to get into a good college/school, compete to climb UP the corporate ladder, and compete aggressively in active sports, but yet they're "too shy" to walk over a few steps and at least introduce himself to a woman he might be interested in?
Come again??
I'm sorry...I'm just not buying it.
Okay so yesterday I was talking to a black relationship coach at this speed dating thing I went to and I asked him what he thought about women approaching men and he said that women should . . . in fact, he called it the number 1 mistake women make (not approaching men). His rationale was that if at least 50% of all men are introverts, then a guy may be interested but has such a high anxiety level about approaching women (for fear of rejection) that they don't do it . . .therefore women should approach guys more.
I tend to disagree . . . just based on my own experience with Dutch Chocolate, who has low self-esteem and is afraid of his own shadow, if HE was bold enough to step to me aggressively, then I'm not so quick to say that guys need women to approach them. If they really want to talk to you, they will.
What do you think about this?
If a guy is interested enough, he will approach.
I'm a firm believer in that. Plus, I've known quite a few "shy guys" to pursue me in the past, and let me tell you....I didn't "initiate" one bit. I was just nice, smiled, and was pleasant. I didn't call him, didn't ask him out, and didn't even get his number first.
Yes, it took a WHILE for these guys to express or actually SHOW some interest forwardly, but I noticed that in each and every instance, the guys eventually DID show interest and I was fully aware that they were interested in me in a romantic way.
If a man is not approaching you, there's a reason (and it ain't cause he's shy). Plus, even if he is responsive to your approach, how do you know if he's genuinely interested or just being polite. When he does the approaching, I don't even have to wonder about it.
1910 or 2010, some dynamics just don't change.
Thank you.
Even if things HAVE changed in 2010 for women, would you necessarily say that they have changed (relationship-wise) for the BETTER? I wouldn't.
I see women more now days just spread opening their legs for any old thing that comes along, believing any type of hype a guy spouts out of his mouth, allowing a man to string them along with a multiple slew of other women through text messages, etc, and not even really respecting themselves. Personally, I don't think things have necessarily changed for the better.
Times have changed...yes....but human nature doesn't change so quickly with the "times".
Truer words were never spoken. I have yet to see a case where the woman initiated things work out in the long run. If the couple is together the woman is always complaining that she's putting more into maintaining it.
What she said.
Honestly, I voted...."It Depends", because really there are many variables. For example...What do you mean exactly by "approaching"? If you're talking about a woman putting herself in the view of a man then I don't see anything wrong with that. I see nothing wrong with a woman saying hello, or asking a man for help just in order to start a conversation going.
But for a woman to ACTIVELY pursue a man (especially in the beginning)
ie:
-Getting his number
-Asking him out/inviting him somewhere before he's invited you anywhere
-Seeming more interested in him than he is in you
-Calling him/Texting him first
-Expressing interest verbally before he does
Etc.
....that just leads to disaster IMO.
It also depends on what the woman actually WANTS. Some women like men who they have to chase, pursue, and control in order to get to like them. Some women don't mind doing this for the remainder of the relationship/marriage. But for me? Naw babe.
I need a MAN. Not some boy who I have to continue to "make things happen" with. Ugh..
If he's that "shy" to even talk to you/call you, then how "shy" will he be in other areas??