When I start lookling like this:
Anything past midback length, personally is too long FOR ME. After that, it seems that hair would be in the way of everything. Not to mention the prices that salons would try to charge if I wanted to treat myself to a nice style for a change. For me MBL is perfect and my goal. Anything after that Will get trimmed/cut back the MLB.
So is it safe to say you're not shooting for floor length?
Damn, stank and innapropriate
For me, it might be past where I am now. I'll have to wait and see though.
....well, ah, anything past calf-length is just STANK and INAPPROPRIATE IMO!
You just have the prettiest hair.
I used to think super long was flattering on me. I was an inch or so from waist length earlier this year and cut it to my chin or right above my shoulder. I've gotten a lot more compliments now that it's shorter.
I only plan on growing it out again to donate it to locks of love. But I don't think anything past MBL looks good on me.
SouthernTease your hair is phenomenal.
Ok if my hair looked like THIS I may be forced to reevaluate my answer to toe length or somethin Gorgeous
i would have said tailbone length. then i saw starr1's hair and was left speechless. her hair is that length and gorgeous.
Mid back length would be my absolute maximum. I can't imagine dealing with that much hair on wash day (detangling/shrinkage).