Mz.MoMo5235
Well-Known Member
ok, so this isnt the best example as its late and i didnt want to go bumbling through my old photo albums but here is a pic of me when i was like 9 (i'm the shorter one with the poof swoopd to the side, no laughing)
and here is my hair now
now i dont know about yall, but even though this is a bad pic, it doesnt look like the same head of hair. both pix my hair is 100% natural
and here is my hair now
now i dont know about yall, but even though this is a bad pic, it doesnt look like the same head of hair. both pix my hair is 100% natural
They look nothing like it, I mean nothing. Nothing. They look like she has limp, lifeless, loose ends, greasy, texturized curls. Just because a curl is "looser" doesn't mean it looks like a natural loose curl. There is a distinct look from natural curls to damaged and/or texturized curls. The girl in your blog looks like she has a Jheri curl, or some other curly perm, or heat damaged natural hair. Those damaged curls she has are thin curls, no clumping. Flame me if you want, I don't give a flying flip, but no one can prove me wrong.







