• ⏰ Welcome, Guest! You are viewing only 2 out of 27 total forums. Register today to view more, then Subscribe to view all forums, submit posts, reply to posts, create new threads, view photos, access private messages, change your avatar, create a photo album, customize your profile, and possibly be selected as our next Feature of the Month.

Which strength relaxer do you prefer?

⏳ Limited Access:

Register today to view all forum posts.

Do you think O.J did it?


  • Total voters
    383
  • Poll closed .
I have the same reason as Keisha....mild works just as well for me as regular or super, and I have never burned from using it, even though I do my own relaxers
smile.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Mochalolita said:
I have the same reason as Keisha....mild works just as well for me as regular or super, and I have never burned from using it, even though I do my own relaxers
smile.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

Well you are luck. I don't know if it is because my hair has gotten stronger over the last few months or what. Regular just does not process like it used to in the past. I have not relax in four months now, but I have alot of underprocessed spots and I left the relaxer on the set amount of time in the instructions. This is part of the reason why I am thinking of transitioning.
 
mild......i have some underprocessing but i'm too afraid of breakage if i go for a higher strength.
 
[ QUOTE ]
den1 said:
mild......i have some underprocessing but i'm too afraid of breakage if i go for a higher strength.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. I use regular, but would never consider using super for fear of frying my hair.
 
Mild, since I self relax and I can't work as fast as a stylist. My hair would be too straight if I self relaxed with Regular. I would get a Regular if I went to a stylist. I hope that makes sense.
 
I've always used regular but I've realized that it makes my hair too straight. So maybe I'll leave it on for less time or downgrade to mild
 
Mild no lye. My hair straightens very easily so when I reach the top, I'm ready to rinse it out so I can keep my curls.
 
i can NOT use mild..it does absolutely NOTHING to my hair. talking about underprocessed. regular is alright, it does leave my hair underprocessed but not as much as the mild. now super gets it nice and straight but i don't use it. i use the regular, because some how i think super is just to harmful to my hair. i definatelt prefer the super tho..if there was a super-ultra-extreme-extra-all mighty-powerful i would probably use that too.
 
Affirm fiberguard mild (lye) was WAAAY to weak for my hair, it did nothing

Affirm Creme Cond regular (lye) was better for me but it still doesn't get my hair as straight as I'd like it
ohwell.gif
I guess I'll be trying Super next.
 
In the past, stylists have used regular to super to straighthen my hair and in some cases, they have taken it to "bone-straight."

For my next relaxer, I will self-relax and shoot for 60-70% straightness. My choice will be mild lye.
smile.gif


Chichi
bdance.gif
 
lthomas1, I guess that I am shooting for underprocessed hair.
laugh.gif
Those "bone-straight" relaxers break off my hair.

Chichi
bdance.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Chichi said:
lthomas1, I guess that I am shooting for underprocessed hair.:D Those "bone-straight" relaxers break off my hair.

Chichi
bdance.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

ITA, I do not intend on going up to super at all. When I want that bone straight look I flat iron.
 
[ QUOTE ]
CaramelHonee said:
I've always used regular... i never even realized there was a mild
laugh.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

I was thinking the same thing.
laugh.gif
 
Back
Top