IMHO, it is very appropriate wear for those members in the congregation either coming from or going to the club but most importantly it advertise that a man is getting a good woman.
Uh - huh....
Insert the 'Amen' 'Where?'
Sexy Christians??
- Thread starter LucieLoo12
- Start date
Uh - huh....
Insert the 'Amen' 'Where?'
Ahhhhh, yeah you do...you look at what pleases your eye and how it will make you "presentable and attactive overall." A sale price is a financial incentiveIt's so ingrained in us as humans. This is why we have the gift of decoration worldwide. We love art. But here ya go
I kid!!!!
I like this potato sak dress....
Hmmmmmm :scratchch:
Add a red belt, red scarf, red earrings (small) and red pumps (not stilletos
) ... Okay 
Stilleto shoes are not 'Christian'
Last edited:
Iwanthealthyhair67
Well-Known Member
^^Shimmie you too funny...stiletto shoes are not 'christian' he he he
Rainbow Dash
Well-Known Member
I like this potato sak dress....
Hmmmmmm :scratchch:
Add a red belt, red scarf, red earrings (small) and red pumps (not stilletos
Stilleto shoes are not 'Christian'
I remember a pastor speaking and he said "don't be wearing no stilettos." 
We were like huh?" We had to talk with him about that. He was cool and we laughed. Question to all: Does your church condemn stilettos?
LucieLoo12
Well-Known Member
****runs to hide Shimmie from being stoned***
LucieLoo12
Well-Known Member
My pastor has never taught against stilettos per say..but he just teaches on modesty and adornment..
But if we came in with these
he would say something
But if we came in with these
he would say something
Rainbow Dash
Well-Known Member
My pastor has never taught against stilettos per say..but he just teaches on modesty and adornment..
But if we came in with these
he would say something
I dont like those ^^^
But I like these .....Am I wrong?
These are nice to me. 
nathansgirl1908
Well-Known Member
Question to all: Does your church condemn stilettos?
No. What would be the point? The shoe isn't making you sin.
I'm all for dressing like a lady, but it sounds like some churches go overboard with it. Makes me wonder if the pastor is trying to avoid temptation himself.
LucieLoo12
Well-Known Member
This isnt a LAW at all..its just preference thats all..
And yes SOME stilletos can be considered unmodest, but so can alot of other things as well...
And yes SOME stilletos can be considered unmodest, but so can alot of other things as well...
LucieLoo12
Well-Known Member
I think those r cute! I like wearing heels....
These are some I would wear..
I like wearing heels....These are some I would wear..
I dont like those ^^^
But I like these .....Am I wrong?
Awwwwww Windsy, I'm so sorry. I was only kidding when I said that.
I actually have a pair of RED Velvet heels with a RED satin ribbon that ties around the ankles. Very pretty pair of shoes. I
them. I was just making light of our conversation on clothing.
Just having a little fun, that's all.
Windsy
New Member
Awwwwww Windsy, I'm so sorry. I was only kidding when I said that.
I actually have a pair of RED Velvet heels with a RED satin ribbon that ties around the ankles. Very pretty pair of shoes. I
I was just making light of our conversation on clothing.
no apologies needed, I actually thought it was because it wasn't modest.
My pastor has never taught against stilettos per say..but he just teaches on modesty and adornment..
But if we came in with these
he would say something
These look like 'ankle breakers'...
I couldn't get past two steps of walking in these without holding onto the wall.
I understand. If we add this to it...
Well.......... I don't have any words, but I do have a "
"
Guitarhero
New Member
C'mon now, we all know that true stillettoes are nicknamed something raw sexy. Now, is that truly "christian?" 
If we truly wish to be modest, we will not do it, we'll exchange it for something appropriate:
Christ-approved!!
If we truly wish to be modest, we will not do it, we'll exchange it for something appropriate:
Christ-approved!!
Question to all: Does your church condemn stilettos?
In our women's meetings, we share 'don't wear what you can't walk in.' Not everyone has the skills to walk in very high heeled shoes. No one has ever condemned wearing them though. A lot of women love these shoes.
One word of caution: They give you bunions. Oh yes
. So that's another reason that I don't wear them. I don't have bunions and don't want to get them. That and the fact that I can't walk in a heel over 3 inches.
C'mon now, we all know that true stillettoes are nicknamed something raw sexy. Now, is that truly "christian?"
Christ-approved!!
My stomach hurts from laughing. When I saw the picture above.
Oh, thank God for my Sketchers ! ! ! Those are my comfort shoes.
Are Sketchers a sin? You know... the sports shoes that tighten your glutes.
Rainbow Dash
Well-Known Member
I was KIDDING about the Stilletos ...
I have a pair, I just can't walk in them.
I started to ask you that. Most people turn on Stilletos when they can no longer walk in them.
Last edited:
Rainbow Dash
Well-Known Member
C'mon now, we all know that true stillettoes are nicknamed something raw sexy. Now, is that truly "christian?"
Christ-approved!!
No!!...don't make me wear those....
I almost got offended. Church womenz tryin to be cute.
Last edited:
aribell
formerly nicola.kirwan
IMHO, it is very appropriate wear for those members in the congregation either coming from or going to the club but most importantly it advertise that a man is getting a good woman.
Fishers of men indeed! Just a thought: beauty and sex are not the same thing. A man may see a beautiful woman or a woman prettied up and be sexually attracted to her. But a woman purposely advertising "sexiness" (actively promoting herself as an object of sexual desire) is something entirely different. Sometimes women get confused and think that they need to put sex in a man's mind in order to be attractive. It's already there. Be pretty, be beautiful, be lovely and let his imagination do the rest.
Honestly, I wouldn't necessarily take issue with the shirts themselves--depending on the context. (for instance, strapless is generally more acceptable in formalwear) A lot of it depends on body type, too. Obviously a woman with DDs could not wear that third shirt in the op. Others could get away with it. (so long as it is worn as a shirt and not a dress!) I don't get the purpose of putting "ChurchGurl" on it though. I think they're trying to be slick, I just can't quite put my finger on how.
ETA: I think the immodesty comes more from the self-promotion of it than the cut of fabric. Or maybe the combination of both. The "attitude" of the design is to show off both physically and religiously. "I'm hot, and I go to church too!" At least that's the message that jumps out at me. And that gives rise to much skepticism because the way we show that we love Christ is by the lives that we live rather than by shining a spotlight on ourselves.
Last edited:
LucieLoo12
Well-Known Member
Looollll @ Christ Approved
this is for GuitarHero
this is for GuitarHero
Just a thought: beauty and sex are not the same thing. A man may see a beautiful woman or a woman prettied up and be sexually attracted to her. But a woman purposely advertising "sexiness" (actively promoting herself as an object of sexual desire) is something entirely different. Sometimes women get confused and think that they need to put sex in a man's mind in order to be attractive. It's already there. Be pretty, be beautiful, be lovely and let his imagination do the rest.
Honestly, I wouldn't necessarily take issue with the shirts themselves--depending on the context. (for instance, strapless is generally more acceptable in formalwear) A lot of it depends on body type, too. Obviously a woman with DDs could not wear that third shirt in the op. Others could get away with it. (so long as it is worn as a shirt and not a dress!) I don't get the purpose of putting "ChurchGurl" on it though. I think they're trying to be slick, I just can't quite put my finger on how.
ETA: I think the immodesty comes more from the self-promotion of it than the cut of fabric. Or maybe the combination of both. The "attitude" of the design is to show off both physically and religiously. "I'm hot, and I go to church too!" At least that's the message that jumps out at me. And that gives rise to much skepticism because the way we show that we love Christ is by the lives that we live rather than by shining a spotlight on ourselves.
At the bolded...
It's already there. It's a huge part of their DNA.
Looollll @ Christ Approved
this is for GuitarHero
But hey, I like that dress.
I'd wear it. I don't know where I'd wear it, but I'd wear it. I hope it passes the TSA folks at the airport...
I'm quick to say, 'Don't touch me or my garment...'
Most people turn on Stilletos when they can no longer walk in them.
They sure do...
That would be me I have a 'ready sermon' up my sleeve at all times. The only scripture I could find is one to support it. "high and lifted up"
No!!...don't make me wear those....
Church womenz tryin to be cute.
They don't make these shoes anymore... do they?
MonPetite
New Member
This thread makes me think:
Why do we, the Church, seem to operate on the world's standards?
Purple linen and gold are snazzy and sensual and were worn by a rather notable lady in proverbs. Sensuality is innate to women and, I believe, is godly.
Sensuality (in its base sense) need not cause lust.
"Sexy" demands it.
A fit woman in form-fitting, but modest attire, with healthy skin and hair, a graceful gait, lilting voice, and loving nature, wearing a nice perfume, and tasteful adornment is sensual.
A man may lust for her, but that's on him.
A fit woman in a body-con dress (with or without "church girl" on it), hair overly teased, an attention grabbing perfume (you know the type), club make-up, an unnaturally provocative gait, come-hither tone, and gazes that invite a man to take her in and desire her is "sexy" (by the world's standards). :whipgirl:
We can't mess around with that.
We can't condemn the natural sensuality god put in woman for His reason and for man's enjoyment either.
A woman in tune with herself is a glorious thing to behold --that does not incite lust. :reddancer:
Weak men, however, will lust over a sensual woman. That's not about HER. That's about HIM.
Weak and strong men can fall prey to "sexy".
That's entirely different, IMO, but it seems the Church lumps these two things together.
For the record...I'm on Team Classic Pump.
Why do we, the Church, seem to operate on the world's standards?
Purple linen and gold are snazzy and sensual and were worn by a rather notable lady in proverbs. Sensuality is innate to women and, I believe, is godly.
Sensuality (in its base sense) need not cause lust.
"Sexy" demands it.
A fit woman in form-fitting, but modest attire, with healthy skin and hair, a graceful gait, lilting voice, and loving nature, wearing a nice perfume, and tasteful adornment is sensual.
A man may lust for her, but that's on him.
A fit woman in a body-con dress (with or without "church girl" on it), hair overly teased, an attention grabbing perfume (you know the type), club make-up, an unnaturally provocative gait, come-hither tone, and gazes that invite a man to take her in and desire her is "sexy" (by the world's standards). :whipgirl:
We can't mess around with that.
We can't condemn the natural sensuality god put in woman for His reason and for man's enjoyment either.
A woman in tune with herself is a glorious thing to behold --that does not incite lust. :reddancer:
Weak men, however, will lust over a sensual woman. That's not about HER. That's about HIM.
Weak and strong men can fall prey to "sexy".
That's entirely different, IMO, but it seems the Church lumps these two things together.
For the record...I'm on Team Classic Pump.
Similar threads
