Wow. That's cool, though.
If there are so many women being SAHM in this current generation, then I think when it will be time for them to go back to work, the time away will not be as much of an issue as it has been in the past because most women and men (husbands) would have gone through it and will understand and will be willing to hire them. At least, that's my hope.
Idk. I get the impression that a lot of us (late gen X/ early gen Y) have lost trust in the current system to the degree that it's more 'stable' to work for a few years, stack up, and start your own thing. That's men and women, tbh.Wow. That's cool, though.
If there are so many women being SAHM in this current generation, then I think when it will be time for them to go back to work, the time away will not be as much of an issue as it has been in the past because most women and men (husbands) would have gone through it and will understand and will be willing to hire them. At least, that's my hope.
If I may be frank, I don't know if it would work for me. I never had to consider any of those things.
Lmao IDK I'll start calling him Scrooge McDuck
How many times y'all gonna call him a miser? So extra.
I have to go back to this post again because upon reflection I have to say that it is actually a very good suggestion.They could live a 50k lifestyle and he foots the good majority of the bills. Her income could go into extras, savings, investment and retirement. When they are ready to retire (and that could be early due to not living on her income) they will have plenty to send their children to school on, vacation with, and live off of from IRA savings and investments.
It also makes sense to do that if she decides to take time off of work to have kids or something happens to her. Lifestyle is shifted so that there are no extras but he can still manage just fine without needing her to work.
Well can they come down some to a happy medium? For instance if I make 100k on my own, I probably live a particular lifestyle. If I marry a man making half that, I would not be inclined to downgrade how I live so dramatically. So with his income we'd be able to save more even if we live on a 75k budget and save, invest the other 75k
I have to go back to this post again because upon reflection I have to say that it is actually a very good suggestion.
Of course it's going to depend on some variables like where they live, and what kind of schools they want to send their children to, what kind of house they want to buy, but overall, living on one partner's lesser income could be a great solution, providing the couple sees eye to eye financially and is willing to be smart about how they use the extra income. Could be the secret to early retirement. The only difference for me is that it could be used regardless of gender role and who makes more.
Unless you know the dude in the OP, why does that bother you? erplexed
My dad retired from the military and is now on his retirement job. He has changed jobs several times to get a good fit, and they have performed several cross country moves. My mom gave up working all together under the guise of finding a job she really likes (like that will ever happen ). They are in their 40s and dont have to work again if they dont want to all because they lived on my dads income and saved my moms.
Hmm so that's why that male poster came in saying that women are footing bill on dates, smh.
So are we just going to ignore this part? She isn't happy with this set up so the "do whatever works for you" and "maybe she is okay with it" argument doesn't fly here. She is not okay with it like many of the women who have posted in this thread are not okay with this set up. I thought this is why posters started talking negatively about this arrangement in the first place--because the woman was unhappy with it.
So if I understand you, you are saying that the solution for women making $100K a year and who are married to men making significantly less, would be for the family to live at the man's income level while putting the woman's income away in other things (savings, investment, retirement etc), just so they can satisfy the rule that the man is paying the majority of the bills? But if the sex were reversed, and the man was the one making $100K, the couple would be expected to live at the $100K income level?
Well can they come down some to a happy medium? For instance if I make 100k on my own, I probably live a particular lifestyle. If I marry a man making half that, I would not be inclined to downgrade how I live so dramatically. So with his income we'd be able to save more even if we live on a 75k budget and save, invest the other 75k
I'm not downgrading my lifestyle for marriage. Lifestyle is important to me, and a big part of the career decisions I made. I just don't want to do that.
Yeah that's not happening. My parents would kick my behind. That's why I got/am getting these degrees.
I'm not downgrading my lifestyle for marriage. Lifestyle is important to me, and a big part of the career decisions I made. I just don't want to do that.
Well can they come down some to a happy medium? For instance if I make 100k on my own, I probably live a particular lifestyle. If I marry a man making half that, I would not be inclined to downgrade how I live so dramatically. So with his income we'd be able to save more even if we live on a 75k budget and save, invest the other 75k
18,000 views....
Whats going on in hereeeeeeeee....
lol
Finger wagging, eyes rolling, and "I would never ..." comments.
Finger wagging, eyes rolling, and "I would never ..." comments.
Actually there were some very good advice given. I learned a few things I might want to apply... in the event I decide to make a third trip down the aisle.
In the meantime, I am happily shacking up. I say happily because I am not paying rent and stuff. I am not being a hypocrite though. I have been in situations where I paid half, depending on the incomes. Its just a special time of my life where my income has to go to things that are VERY important to me, and my current SO understands and is cool with that.
There is no way I am about to read this long thread. I just wanted to say this must be some time of record in LHCH history...700 plus replies?