This is a repost of an article originally posted at Afrikan Frontline Network. © Frontline News Service. All Rights Reserved.
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]
THE CURSE OF HAM[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Fact or Fiction?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Genesis 9:20-27, popularly known as the Curse of Ham, in conjunction with the scriptures immediately following (Gen. 10 in its entirety), known as the Table of Genealogies, is most used to explain and even justify the plight of the black peoples of the world throughout history. This most decisive derogatory racial tradition stems from a collection of Jewish oral traditions in the Babylonian Talmud dating from the second to sixth century A.D. that holds that the descendants of Ham were cursed by being black.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]It is the intent of this author to discredit this ludicrous myth totally and reveal the scriptural truth behind the curse of Noah. Genesis 9:20-27 reads as follows:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard and he drank of the wine, and was drunken and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, cursed be Canaan. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, blessed be the Lord God of Shem, and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, and Canaan shall be his servant.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]As stated above, this scripture popularly known as the curse of Ham, is used to explain the plight of the black race. However, in order to understand the truth, this scripture must be correctly interpreted by asking the three following questions.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]1. Who is actually committing this sin?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]2. What is the sin being committed?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]3. What is the punishment (or curse) for this sin?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]In the Bible, it is customary to document genealogies from eldest to youngest and in most instances this is the case (the exception being from youngest to eldest). Therefore, Ham is the second son of Noah (Gen. 9:18), not his youngest. Ham is noted as being the father of Canaan. Canaan was the youngest son of Ham (Gen. 10:6). The lack of a word for grandson and nephew in the Hebrew dialect used in the Old Testament of the Bible adds further confusion to the interpretation of this curse. All male descendants were referred to as son whether grandson or nephew. Also, Deuteronomy 24:16 reads:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]The fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor shall the children be put to death for their fathers; a person shall be put to death for his own sin.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Considering, these substantiating scriptures, it was Canaan, not Ham, who had committed the sin thus the prophetic curse of Noah, was on Canaan, and it did not apply to Ham or any of his other descendants.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]There have been many different interpretations of the sin committed. Some say Canaan looked upon Noah's naked body, or that he committed a homosexual act while Noah slept. The confusion over this sin is what keeps many from understanding the nature of the curse that followed. In order to determine what the sin was, you must understand the scriptural definition of "thy father's nakedness". Leviticus 20:11 reads:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt not thou uncover. It is thy father's nakedness. And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]With "thy father's nakedness" so defined, the indication is that Noah and his wife, both, were asleep in the tent, thus the need for both Shem and Japheth to lay a garment over their shoulders to cover the occupants of the tent, and enter backwards so as not to see "their father's nakedness". Canaan apparently had sex with Noah's wife while they slept. The nature of the sin is further indicated by the punishment or curse for the sin.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]In reading of another person who committed this exact sin, Genesis 35:22 reads:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]While Israel was living in that region, Ruben went in and slept with his father's concubine Bilhah, and Isreal heard of it.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]The punishment or curse that Ruben (Israel's firstborn son) received for sleeping with his father's wife (concubine), was the loss of the choice land that went to the first born and therefore his descendants did not excel (Gen. 49:3-4, I Chron. 5:1-2). Thus, the penalty for this sin is the loss of your birthright, which is land. This is the exact punishment Canaan received. He lost his inheritance to his land. Thus Genesis 9:20-27 properly interpreted reads:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]And Noah awoke from his wine, and he knew what his grandson had done unto his wife. And he said, cursed be Canaan. He will be conquered by his brethren (decsendants of Shem), who themselves will be conquered (by decsendants of Japheth). And he said, blessed be the Lord God of Shem, and Canaan's land will be conquered and possessed by Shem. God shall enlarge Japheth's territory, and he will live in the homes Shem built in the land of Canaan.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]
This curse dealt exclusively with land ownership and in fact, is what later became the blessing of Abraham. The land of Canaan is the land God promised to give to the descendants of Abraham, who himself was a descendant of Shem. All of the great conquering powers that swept through the land of Canaan (once the descendants of Shem had established themselves there) were in fact descendants of Japheth and did indeed cause a dispersion of the descendants of Shem and occupied the cities they built.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Those who translated and thereby interpreted the Bible were not the ones who wrote it. They defined blacks based on misinterpretations of their translations. It is interesting to note that the people who have the worst (though not only), history of enslaving people, would interpret these verses for their own gain - that of keeping their slaves enslaved.
For example, the belief that blacks are cursed originating from the Babylonian Talmud received even greater elaboration during the Middle Ages when Noah's curse was further explained:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]"It must be Canaan, your firstborn, whom they enslave... Canaan's children shall be born ugly and black!... Your grandchildren's hair shall be twisted into kinks... [their lips] shall swell." Men of this race are called Negroes; their forefather Canaan commanded them to love theft and fornication, to be banded together in hatred of their masters, and never to tell the truth."[/FONT]
(Tsiporah's comment: Now you know those who wrote the Babylonian Talmud were liars period. That is why I do not read it.)
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]That passage includes not only a clear description of the color and physical type of the "cursed" people, it also presents the principal stereotype associated with blacks - thieves, fornicators, and liars. In actuality, blacks are enslaved if they accept any part of this misinterpretation.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]The translation of a manuscript of Benjamin ben Jonah, a twelfth-century merchant and traveler from Spanish Navarre, not only supports the same theme but suggests that it was fairly widespread:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]"There is a people who like animals, eat of the herbs that grow on the banks of the Nile, and in the fields. They go about naked and have not the intelligence of ordinary men. They cohabit with their sisters and anyone they find. These sons of Ham are black slaves."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]To the extent that this myth was generally accepted by Europeans, to that same extent could the inferior position of blacks be explained by Noah's curse and thus rationalized biblically.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]The black peoples of the world must take caution in their understanding of biblical scripture and be more responsible in their acceptance of interpretations thereof. Consideration must also be given to historical and scientific fact.[/FONT]
The rest of it is here.....
http://www.clubcanaan.com/studies/Canaan2.html