One of my besties, a new mom to a 4 month old was telling me how her DH does absolutely nothing. No feeding times, diaper changing or anything. She said if she leaves to go to a store it's a big discussion about it 1st and then if she's gone over said amount of time he's calling her like crazy. Well, for me I would be extremely frustrated considering I'm a person that has to get some sleep to be mobile.
I was discussing it with my cousin & SO yesterday and my cousin said she dealt with the same thing and that when the baby would cry she would have to take him in another room to silence him if her SO was watching TV or sleep b/c he would get annoyed. My SO, said he can't wait to be hands on and that the thought of just providing wasn't good enough. (Thank God ) But he made my cousin feel better by telling her that her SO prolly didn't know what to do and didn't want to hurt their child.
I'm wondering b/c I’ve seen a few posts around here somewhat close to what I mentioned above. So my question is, if he's paying bills etc. but he's totally hands off in the nurturing and care for the child, would that be grounds for divorce for you? Or would you wait it out until the kid is older when ur DH/SO can do the fun stuff like take him to get a hair cut or take her to the mall?
Oh and these are both working Moms.
In many cultures men don't wash, feed or change the baby. Sometimes things are just the way they are.
Now, I think I'd have a problem if the sound of my (OUR) baby crying would send him in a tizzy where I would have to leave the room. Yeah, we'd have major issues behind that, because I wouldn't trust him around my kid. God forbid, I need to run to the store for a quick minute to get something and find my baby in a coma from shaken baby syndrome, then he would have to die.
Then again, I would have no one to blame but MYSELF behind this, because the warning signs were there. I chose to ignore them.