Exactly, are FWB really liberating/healthy/conducive for the mind, body and spirit?
I’m sorry but……………letting someone stick, lick, stroke your body and you doing the same to their body…….. is a "relationship" of some sort - no matter how it is defined.
Now, I'm wonder if some men even care about being in a relationship or being a "good" boyfriend if they know they can still get the booty after things are official over.
The bolded is definitely true. I have never been one to sit and label women for their experiences or to try and shame women, I have no room to do that. Still, I think that our collective conversation about this topic generally is wacky. "Detachment" seems to be becoming this admired skill for a woman to have. I know there are women out there thinking, "Hmm...how can I learn to disconnect my thoughts and feelings from this physical act? How can I learn to
detach? I need to learn how to do that." And I would just ask "Why?" I would suggest that to even speak of
detaching and
disconnecting means that we are attempting to block ourselves from experiencing the
full reality of a situation, which is that there is a person (or persons) to whom we have joined ourselves. It's not that the reality isn't there--we just don't want to think about what it means.
Please note that this has nothing to do with whether strings-free sex can be "fun." It can be. But still, "fun" is a category too shallow for it. In order for it to simply be fun, one has to pretend that it is nothing more than playing around. Badminton is fun. Superbowl parties are fun. Dancing is fun. But while sex can definitely
include having fun together, a man's penis inside you, potentially creating a whole new human being, is something else entirely.
If I were to regularly go out in public with a man, holding hands, cuddling up against one him, whispering in his ear, ect. but then claimed that there was nothing between us, we just liked doing that, people would be like
It just wouldn't make any sense to take gestures that obviously have relational significance and pretend that they don't. "Yeah, he's just some guy I felt like hugging up on..."
I don't see how sex can be
less meaningful than that.
Of course women have sex drives and enjoy sex, but I highly doubt most women are just sooo horny that they can't possibly sit on it and wait for something real to come along. We're
choosing to ignore reality in order to take pressure off of the loneliness of the moment or the frustration of not having found the one yet.
And then the question of whether one can turn a FWB into marriage inevitably comes up. It happens. At the same time, by embracing these types of sexual relationships, women are teaching men that they don't have to live up the expectation that sex is a significant act, exclusive to commitment. On a collective level women are saying to men, "Yeah, we're just like you. Sex is like bumping elbows, just a lot more enjoyable." But then the fact that we were lying to ourselves shows up on the other side of the altar when we expect that he understands that sex is this deeply significant and meaningful act that is only between him and us. But that's an inconsistent message. Here, the issue isn't even sex before marriage, it's about acting as if sex is so devoid of significance that you don't even have to be dating the person or even like the person beyond the physical to justify having sex with them. I think that
collectively sending that message to men (esp. young men) will gradually erode any expectations women can reasonably have that a man, even if he marries her, will appreciate the significance of sexual fidelity. If it was just bumping elbows before marriage, then what difference does it make if he's bumping elbows with that woman at the gym, or his coworker?
Some may feel like their experience is different. This is relevant to those to whom it's relevant.