aribell
formerly nicola.kirwan
Ok... but that's still a secular/societal(?) concept being applied to a Christian context.
The Christian context is no sex outside of marriage.
The Christian context is to "court" versus "date".
The Christian context is to seek and connect with someone spiritually compatible.
So when you say "rarely has a boyfriend", how many is enough? How many boyfriends move you from "rare" to "often" to "frequent"?
When does the single life begin? 16? 18? 21? 25? 30?
The term doesn't define or defend (me), it demonstrates the range of perspectives as influenced by upbringing, for example.
ITA. I think one of the main reasons Christian "singles" (I don't even think the label is necessary) struggle so much is that we're thinking about relationships and marriage in worldly terms. Something like "She never has a man" implies that there is supposed to be a steady stream of men flowing in and out of a woman's life. How many "men" are we supposed to have in all? I believe that as far as the Lord is concerned, if you are unmarried, you are FINE! If you aren't dating, you are fine. It's all about finding yourself in His will. He is not the one telling singles that there must be something wrong with them if they don't have a "man"--it's the world that's saying that, and other Christians in their misunderstanding.
Now, if people are struggling finding someone, then that might be a practical or intrapersonal problem (hopping between this thread and the Perpetual Singles one) that can be addressed, but for Christians, there really shouldn't be any extra value judgements placed on being single. It's like women like Hannah and Elizabeth in the Bible. If society weren't basing a woman's worth solely on her ability to bear children, they may not have found themselves so distraught over the fact that they were barren. In the church at least, we should have a different mentality. (sorry if I veered a little ot).