Hmm...while i admire your willingness to admit to what on the surface could look like hypocracy...I wonder....:scratchch
(taking the "is he demanding vs. encouraging" angle out of this...)
is it truly hypocritical to think that a husband wanting his wife to embrace what naturally comes out of head IS different than a husband requesting that she alter her appearance with chemicals?
or is there perhaps really a difference?
Perhaps there is a nuance to this that we're missing at first glance.
For instance.... let's say I have naturally bone straight hair and am always curling it because big hair is all the rage......and my hubby one day says to me "babe i like you the way God made you...maybe you should stop curling your hair all the time and work with what you got"
would
that somehow be more palatable than....
if I was a woman with naturally curly hair whose husband said "babe...you look so much nicer without your natural curl pattern. maybe you should get you one of those nice flat irons they talk about on that hair board you're always on and straighten it. or just get some lye and change it permanently?"
race, marital status and all divisive distractions aside....
rather than seeing it as hypocracy -
is a request just inherently easier to swallow when it's in favor of what comes naturally to you?
this argument could be made for a husband telling his naturally curvy wife to embrace her body vs. a husband who requests she loses weight below her natural frame........or any universal examples of natural vs. altered.
Disclaimer: to folks who like to approach everything with saltiness...please note that #1 - im not the one to come at crazy
....and #2. im a very inquisitive person...and am genuinely curious about what ya'll think
so let's keep any ***.umptions to a minimum..ok?
my booty is still a bit soar from all squats I did while ducking low blows yesterday