I was referring to the women who think you have to bow to your husbands every whim, regardless of how you feel, in order to have a happy/successful marriage. I was also referring to those who think they have the right to judge the strength of another person's marriage based on their opinions on a message board. Pathetic.
can i just point out that the opinions on this topic vary amongst the married women too??? and that there isnt a universal married woman's opinion.
the insinuation that some of the differences in opinions are linked to whether a woman is married or single doesn't feel right to me
just because someone isnt married doesnt take away their ability to empathize and have a valid opinion. and i think all the posters on this thread have shown that they are being thoughtful and honest (very honest) about their views.
and who is to say a single woman doesnt still have the benefit of being in successful, healthy long term relationship that she can speak from?
the generalization is just a faulty one IMO
to pull the single card on one person but then totally be open to the very same opinion being said by another poster just because she is married is off putting and subtley divisive.
i havent even stated how i stand on this issue (and probably wont)
but can we agree that EVERYONE's feelings are equally valid....
its a personal peeve of mine when folks marginalize others experiences.
even if that wasnt the intention (and i sincerely suspect it wasnt) thats still how it came off to me and im sure some others who rather not speak up.
as you were.......
no worries hun!
i could tell you didn't mean any offense. it's just that soon thereafter the "don't listen to anyone who dont have a man" stuff started and thats rang unfair to me.
no one group of people has the manopoly on good judgement.
The BIGGEST irony of this discussion is that disaggreements and semantics aside.....the general board is actually in a consensus (did anyone else peep that )
while folks are debating granular points..... the board as a whole seems to say that
1. a happy home is important
2. OP should have a open conversation with dh that involves finding a solution that works for them both
3. approach is key and he should check himself before demanding anything of a grown woman (whether she be his wife or not)
4. before she even worries about him OP needs to assess how she even feels about her own hair because she doesnt even seem sold on it herself.
5. and if she does want to be natural her lack of swag, shrinkage, and choice of styles may be the culprit of her man's dismay moreso than the fact that she doesnt have a relaxer (and lets be real...to be natural in this society and look good doing it: swag is a must)
i actually think that is all great advice. which is why i had nothing more to add
I don't think anyone without a husband can relate to this situation, nor should they be giving advice. My husband's opinion regarding my hair, clothing, makeup, etc. all matter. If I hated his hair, clothes, etc. I'd expect him to take my opnion under serious consideration and I would do the same.
i adamentaly disagree with this sentiment and wonder if you read every single post on this thread before saying it.
who are YOU to say what someone can relate to?
who are YOU to assume what experiences in maintaining a healthy, long term, give-and-take relationship the women on this board have whether they be married or not?
and to make your statement even more ill conceived the hilarious thing is....MANY of the women who are disagreeing with each other are married women debating with other married women. so its not even like you are illuminating any valid source behind people's difference of opinions.
the most functional couple i know has been together for over a decade and isnt married but does wonderfully at making sure each others needs are met. id love to hear her take on this issue
but according to you...her opinion wouldnt count because being married is the be-all and end-all for knowing anything about positive interpersonal relationships
right?
how incredibly unfair and close minded of you.
i pray that anyone on this board who ever seeks to give you their sincere opinion meets your standards of worthiness before having the misfortune of being dismissed so unjustly.
I can only speak for myself here. I do look more childish when I wear my natural hair out. This is the only time I get carded. This is the only time that I'm not referred to as "madame" or "ma'am". So there is a reason for that, whether or not I agree with it.
Also, the older women get, the more conservative their style becomes. It's as simple as that. I'm speaking about social norms here; that's not to say that this is the general rule for everyone, in every society.
High ponytails ARE frequented by young women, teens, and cheerleaders (at least in the US). That doesn't mean it doesn't look good. That simply means that older women who are more conservative don't usually wear high ponytails, unless it's secured into a bun.
I don't know what industries others work in. I would consider mine among the least "liberal" or forgiving. And hair that is worn out in our workplace has to be close to the scalp. Plain and simple. That is the rule in our workplace, regardless of your race, skin color, or hairtype/length. I've seen many a time when Caucasian colleagues were called in and told to tone down their hair or get a haircut (usually our first-year associates or interns encounter this sort of reprimand). Kinky, coily colleagues rarely encounter this in my industry (that I've seen) simply because they already seem to know the rules somehow and usually come in looking polished already, their hair close to their scalps (regardless of the style).
Regarding Yaya, her style - an updo - does not count to me as being "loose hair" because it's secured into an elegant updo. I love her hairstyle and if the top was low enough, I'd totally be able to wear that to work. But the farther it is from our scalps, in my industry, the more likely we'll be given a talking to.
I have no idea how it works for other industries...mine is pretty conservative, but they're not crazy and would never do anything to invite a lawsuit (like tell me that I can't wear kinky hair, period).
Umm..WHAT!! Okay..it would of been on like donkey kong! He shouldn't have said those things to you...that wasn't very nice. Anyway..why don't u put some kinky twist in your hair...with a weave or something.
Btw..ask your husband has he ever seen some relaxed women hair that looked like BOOO!? If he says no..hmm, then you know buddy has been brainwashed!
Yeah, this is the 21st century, which is why i said my opinion would be contrary to some on this board. Which is why I further elaborated that OP should work this out between her and DH. My opinion really doesn't matter when it comes to HER marriage. I hope there is a happy medium.
But, if it were me and I had to choose between being natural and making my husband happy - DH wins every time. I'd rather be relaxed and happily married than natural and unhappily married. That's just me though- to each his own.
True...however,....I guess I dont feel as strong as you on the topic...and maybe thats why our opinions differ....I have natural 4b hair that I love and take tender love and care for.....I also have a fiance that makes me happy and has been there for me in so many ways I cant even begin to reflect...Ultimately when it boils down to it...if I were ever in a situation where my fiance perfered a certain look on me..I would not hesitate to try and "compromise" coming to a decision that makes us both happy...me doing so does not mean I dont stand up for myself, or that I do everything my fiance asks of me....k......but ....whatever floats your boat...I'm not knocking your views cause you have all the right...I'm only asking that you try and respect the views of others....degrading by caliing others' views as "pathetic" is uncalled for....JMHO..
I don't think anyone without a husband can relate to this situation, nor should they be giving advice. My husband's opinion regarding my hair, clothing, makeup, etc. all matter. If I hated his hair, clothes, etc. I'd expect him to take my opnion under serious consideration and I would do the same.
Oh I completely agree with you.
I just don't understand people saying that BKT is a compromise when it essentially does the same thing as a relaxer and it uses chemicals as well.
Hell, I don't even think straightening is a good compromise but at least it's not permanent (or semi-permanent).
All I know is I'm happy I don't have this problem.
I don't think anyone without a husband can relate to this situation, nor should they be giving advice. My husband's opinion regarding my hair, clothing, makeup, etc. all matter. If I hated his hair, clothes, etc. I'd expect him to take my opnion under serious consideration and I would do the same.
This is an extremely divisive and unproductive comment.
I am going to put in my two cents ...
I can definitely tell who has a successful marriage based on what has been posted.
You know what? Im sorry but I gotta say this-- I have only had problems like this with black men. Now I will say that there are some black men that will kill for a natural sista, but my man (who happens to be white) and others before him (either white or asian), did not have a problem with my hair. It was alway the black men who tried to change me ("why don't you straighten your hair?"). This is not a case of having a man or not-- I doubt everyone that doesn't have a man be it bf or husband lost them due to having a brain thus being able to make their own decisions. There are MANY women that cater to their men and still get cheated on, or just plain left in the dust. People are saying "Relaxing your hair is not a big deal to save your marriage", well is it not true that his wife wanting natural hair shouldn't cause strife in the marriage either?