dimopoulos
dimopoulos
Thanks for the update, I agree that you should rollback to version 3.8 (for now). As a suggestion, maybe run your next "upgrade" on a parallel development server and solicit testers from your LHCF user DB. The user(s) can test functionality and performance on more than one browser. If you test on the development server (if you have access to one) vs. going production with only a few common scenarios tested, it's going to present less challenges in providing an environment that'll meet overall expectations (less grumbles). You should always want to develop to accommodate a variety of user preferences on the most common browsers .
Thanks a million Nikos!!
I'm so happy that you're working on it and letting us know what you're going to do.
Now, what are we gonna do the whole first week of November?
That is actually not a solution since it has been tried, tested and failed.
There have been numerous boards that have made the move to v4 and decided a few months later to switch to v3.8. The ones that stuck to v4 have managed to pull it through with increased server resources etc.
I always use the parallel development - heck one of the users found the dev board and went and registered there once - but it is never going to give you an accurate picture of what the live site will be like. I cannot have 1000 testers on the development board to simulate browsers, load, traffic etc.
Development boards are fine to address functionality issues but not load issues. Even with a load simulator like Apache's jmeter or ab testing you cannot get a good picture of what is going to happen in a live environment.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
dimopoulos
Wow Nikos! I don't know what you did (or didn't do
lol), but I'm extreeeemely happy right now with the
performance of the forum! Thanks so much