I watched her 3 part series on flat ironing her hair. It was way too many steps for me but it works for her. I thought her hair was gorg, I don't know about the ends though they looked see through and like she needed a trim, which I think she said she was going to do. I personally need to use a heat protectant because without it I suffered from heat damage, with it no heat damage. I don't personally like or use grapeseed oil anymore because it's too heavy and weighs down my straightened hair and makes it oily and greasy looking. I prefer a spray heat protectant or the gloss kind for some reason small amounts of that doesn't cause the oily or greasy look.
Although I have no clue what she meant when she said she doesn't mind if the heat "alters" not "damages" her hair. What's the difference? Altered curls to me mean heat damage, they might not be stick straight but the heat has definitely loosened your natural curl pattern and slightly in a way damaged it (IMO) but I guess she likes to call it "altered"
I have seen her videos before. Basically she has unicorn, teflon-coated hair. She engages in hair practices that would render most women bald, but her hair thrives with that kind of care, so more power to her; it wouldn't be me by a longshot.
Well if you want to get technical, all hair is damaged. Hair is a dead fiber that can only be preserved as much as we care to preserve it and even then enviromental factors and even simple friction can damage the outermost layer of the hair's cuticle. It's a fact that on very long hair, the ends will have incurred considerable damage whether the hair is in a chemically unaltered state or not. By your definition of damage you should take into account these other forms that you can't see as immediately.
She says that her her is altered because it has been altered by heat to such a degree that the hair takes on a "straighter" appearance than it normally would in its natural state. True devastating damage (to her and in my opinion) is the kind where the hair strand is completely destroyed, which would mean her hair would be breaking, wispy, and thin. Clearly that is not the case she's been able to maintain the integrity of her hair strand regardless of the change in its natural curl pattern. This is evidenced in her videos. Her hair may be "heat damaged" to you, but by your definition of damage everyone's hair damaged. Just because you don't see the damage doesn't mean it's not there. Texture change isn't the only tell-tale sign of damage. As long as it looks healthy, she will continue to do her thing, just like you and I.
Typing from phone, please excuse my spelling and grammar.
She doesn't say she uses a cone spray at the end of the video, but she states that her conditioner contains silicone, which is her heat protectant.As a forever lurker, I've been waiting for someone to post this lol. I unsubbed from her after this video because she sounds too condescending here and in most of her other videos/comments. I'm also perplexed because she does use a form of a heat protectant, a cone based spray (but she doesn't admit to this until the end of the video).
Hmmm I don't think she is stuck on a certain length. She said herself she cut I don't know how many inches before she begins her challenge. She retained 3 inches in six months- 3 that looks like 4 inches to me-. If she was really stuck, her hair wouldn't go anywhere.I saw visible damage on her strands on the closeups. Split ends, midshaft splits, and weak/bent ends.
Most damaging hair practices are not going to render someone bald. I sometimes see someone advocating something damaging that still allowed them to get from TWA to SL. Lots of people can get to SL with damage because the hair is only a year or so old. When the hair gets to be 2, 3, or more years old (which you need to get to BSL & beyond), damage catches up.
The lenghts that a person will be "stuck at" vary from person to person. The hair practices that will get some stuck at APL will get others stuck at EL. Her hair seems to be highly resiliant, which is why she is stuck at a longer length than most would be. I assume she is stuck there because people who are intentionally maintaining a length have full, healthy ends because they are trimming to stay there.
I can't tell how long her hair is (seems about APL or shorter?), but why didn't she show the finished look?
Her hair looks shorter and less healthy than it did here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94q3NC_pbxA
I can't imagine the heat helped.
I have seen her videos before. Basically she has unicorn, teflon-coated hair. She engages in hair practices that would render most women bald, but her hair thrives with that kind of care, so more power to her; it wouldn't be me by a longshot.
Hmmm I don't think she is stuck on a certain length. She said herself she cut I don't know how many inches before she begins her challenge. She retained 3 inches in six months- 3 that looks like 4 inches to me-. If she was really stuck, her hair wouldn't go anywhere.
APL? I don't think so. Her hair is waist length
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw5jIHKSvj4
But it is a little like a skinny person with a high metabolism talking about their "burgers n fries" diet as if that helped them get thin, when actually, they got thin in spite of it. The difference is that while pretty much everyone knows some people have a fast metabolism and can eat whatever, good black hair practices are not widely understood. Judging by the video comments, it seems like a few people will be led astray.
If the burgers n fries diet is going to work for you, you are already skinny. If this regimen is going to work for you, you already have long hair.
Well, for me, if that is unhealthy hair, it looks a lot better that so called healthy heads I have seen. Its thick, shiny,and lush. It has lots of body and movement. I remember KimmyYT, when did her big reveal. I was not impressed. And she supposedly had healthy hair practices