Natrlchallenge said:My hair thrived better relaxed. I did everything wrong too. Used all the products that most people avoid....petrolatum, pink oil, etc. u name it my hair grew and loved it. I'm natural now, and it seems like my hair is taking forever to grow. Shrinkage for me is a beeyach! My hair is totally backwards. The one difference is the shedding factor- my hair sheds less now, but that may be because my hair is short.
I thought over processing was something that the person did wrong and not the relaxer it self . I say that your hairs life cycle may not be as long as others, even though it is said that the hair is dead, normal and healthy hair has a steady cycle of events that each strand goes through. Which are growth, fall, and replacement. Also a certain amount of hair is shed daily. This is nature's method of making way for new hair. The average like cycle of hair ranges form 4 to 7 years (eyelashes and eyebrows are replaced every 4 to 5 months), but keep in mind that factors such as sex, age, type of hair, heredity, and health have a bearing on the duration of hair life. HTHsugaplum said:Yes it's exaclty as you stated. Girl let me tell you, I've tried every product from A-A ranging from $5-$100!! And nothing worked. My old hairstylist would use products on my hair that would only "cover-up" the problem. I've soon come to release that the relaxers I was using was damaging myhair.
I choose to be natural because it's healthier for my hair and my body.
birdie said:I didn't vote because I have a slightly different theory. I think hair thrives when it taken care of. I've both natural & relaxed and texturixed. Hair is a dead appendage so neither way in my opinion is better. When hair is handled with care it thrives. There are other factors like diet, the elements(environmental) ,water quality, illness, etc... but in my opinion for the most part I think hair that is handled with care thrives.
beyondcute said:I took my stance froma scientific approach. The less done to a structure the more stable it is. Relaxers break the bonds of the hair and release the curl in doing so. Therefore making the hair weaker. Imagine knocking down walls inside and outside a home. The sturcture would be comprmised and therefore more likely to crumble. NOW I will say that IF you have a regime and take care of your hair like your life depended on it then Id suspect your hair would be healthier than a natural that didnt take care of thier hair at all. BUT if you had to compare 2 people that used the same regime and had the same hair types/textures then Id have to go with the natural.
loonatick said:hey Pookeylou, i love your hair!! Its got so much character
loonatick said:Hey Natrlchallenge, so why did you go natural then???
loonatick said:so in your case sugaplum, overprocessing caused your damage, despite your efforts to moisturize and condition?
I have no clue of my growth rate as my hair as never gotten past neck length. Im beginning to think is this as good as it gets? Maybe that is my lot, neck length or nothing, either natural relaxed or texturuised. I am trying my hardest to reach shoulder length, then i will know for sure if i can retain length, seeing as i never have before.
But i must say, as much as it frustrates me i love my hair, this is the best it has been. its just it has always baffled me.......
uess it all depends. My hairsylver2 said:Yup!! What she said.
honeycomb719 said:uess it all depends. My hair
I beg to differ, but I guess it all jus depends. My hair retains more length when natural. I'm learning that now my second time being natural. I went back to relaxers after going natural once b4 thinking that since I better understood how to take care of my hair it would thrive, but that wasnt the case, no matter how much I babied my hair, the relaxer jus didnt allow my thin strands to retain growth. So, thats why I voted natural....
loonatick said:This is what initially sparked my interest for this thread. I have been previously relaxed (when i was 8 and later at 15) and didnt know squat about looking after it. It would been nice when i had a fresh relaxer, then it would go down hill from week 3 onwards. So since finding this board, i have always been thinking that maybe i could have healthy relaxed hair. But from what i have experienced with it, it doesnt make me want to go through all that again, only to realise the same thing. That i should have stayed natural !!!
sugaplum said:Hey loonastick How's it growing?
You brought up a very good point about being natural. True I still am, but I'm not gonna lie I do miss the lye. But that's why I'm rockin' the wig below in my siggy. So I guess you can say it's the best of both worlds.