I'm not quite sure why under-processed hair is bad. It makes complete sense why over-processed hair can be damaging, but what about underprocessed hair?
I really believe my hair was underprocessed during my last relaxer, since I can still visually see the newgrowth from the past 6 months. The only difference I've noticed was the fact that the new growth is wavier and isn't as tightly coiled as prior to the relaxer.
So, why is under-processed hair considered to be bad?
I really believe my hair was underprocessed during my last relaxer, since I can still visually see the newgrowth from the past 6 months. The only difference I've noticed was the fact that the new growth is wavier and isn't as tightly coiled as prior to the relaxer.
So, why is under-processed hair considered to be bad?