then by you definition of what's mixed and whats not... latinos would still be black and not mixed. my dad is a black latino, his dad and his mother are black latinos, and from pix, their parents were black latinos... yet there is still a large variation of hair types and eye color... so if you can find a black latino with type 1 hair who's parents and grandparents are black latino... then there are black people with type one hair.
now by no means am i trying to be a smart a$$... but this is the exact point i was trying to make...
its like if you have someone who's black/white, and they marry someone who is black/white. they then have a kid, that kid marries a kid who's also the same mix (both parents) and they have a kid... and so on and so on... now lets do this like 5x... if that kid comes out, lets say, light skinned lets say my complexion) with 3c/4a mix hair, we wouldnt hesitate to call them black. but if the kid came out lets say light skinned (again my complexion) with 1b/2a mixed hair, then they dont count cause they're mixed. i dont like that... we need to claim all of us, we cant pick and choose.
now the indians and the new zealand kids, i can get the point of not being od african blood line (i dont know how true or not true that is). but when we talk about african americans, south americans, and the caribbeans, we're the same people yall, just a different up bringing and a slightly different mix (same africans, different europeans SOMETIMES).
AND I THINK WE ARE OFFICIALLY OFF TOPIC lmao