RainbowCurls
New Member
I'd read about how people who switched from no-lye to lye had found that the lye-relaxed parts of their hair were softer than the no-lye parts. Now, I'd never actually experienced that myself.
But yesterday, I realised that the hair nearer my roots was really soft, the hair at the ends was a lot drier, and in the middle, well in between.
So maybe the no-lye/lye relaxers explain that.
Or maybe, I thought... the hair at the ends has been around a lot longer and therefore taken more damage, so that could explain it.
I only switched to lye in September 04, so if I have an average growth rate, I would only have 3.5" of lye relaxed hair/new growth by now.
But it's only the bottom 2-4 inches of my hair which is noticably dryer than the rest. So that would leave some of the 'soft' part still no-lye relaxed...
I'm starting to think; as long as I keep on relaxing my hair, when it gets to a certain length, it's all going to go wrong.
But yesterday, I realised that the hair nearer my roots was really soft, the hair at the ends was a lot drier, and in the middle, well in between.
So maybe the no-lye/lye relaxers explain that.
Or maybe, I thought... the hair at the ends has been around a lot longer and therefore taken more damage, so that could explain it.
I only switched to lye in September 04, so if I have an average growth rate, I would only have 3.5" of lye relaxed hair/new growth by now.
But it's only the bottom 2-4 inches of my hair which is noticably dryer than the rest. So that would leave some of the 'soft' part still no-lye relaxed...
I'm starting to think; as long as I keep on relaxing my hair, when it gets to a certain length, it's all going to go wrong.