I guess I must be stupid and ignorant then...
IN MY EXPERIENCE, I have never known a brown skinned or dark brown skinned girl to have long hair. Everyone I have ever known with long hair has been lighter skinned (and usually mixed with something that is non-black). In fact, the first dark skinned female with long hair I ever saw was Rudy on the Cosby's. The others I have seen are ladies on the board. I have yet to meet in person a dark skinned female with long hair.
So, if that makes me stupid and/or ignorant, well then so be it.
I know logically that there are many reasons why black women in general don't have long hair. But, I only learned that information when I joined this board in February. For the first 22 years of my life all I knew was that light skinned black girls had long hair because they were mixed with something. The long hair came from their non-black ancestors. And since I didn't have any non-black ancestors, I wasn't going to have long hair.
I have a feeling that it is going to take a LONG time for me to replace my old beliefs that I've had for two decades with new information. In fact, it'll probably take until I reach waist length. Then I'll know for sure (100% without a doubt) that dark skinned girls can have long hair too.
I thank you for your honesty. Frankly, I wouldn't put it down to 100% ignorance, too, though I do believe the more we learn the less likely we believe this to be true. I'm from CA, too. what part are you from? It's definitely not true for me that all light-skinned girls I saw had long hair, nor that the only people I saw with long hair were light skinned girls (people are conflating these two statements a lot). But, I do believe that if I were to take a statistical survey, my results would be that people who had a
looser hair type had longer hair
on average than people who had a tight curl. I still think that's true, and who knows the reason. Maybe it's because the tighter your hair, the sooner they gave you a perm which broke what hair you did have right off. And the tighter your hair, the rougher they combed it believing that, since it was extra nappy it must also be extra tough, when in reality the tighter the curl the more fragile the hair is. For whatever reason, I still think that
in general it is true that the looser your hair, the easier it is to grow long. And if I look around, this is what I still see. Of course I always knew it was possible for anyone to grow their hair long, and my cousin, who is quite dark and with kinky hair, has the longest hair I know on any black girl I know personally and almost for any color of person with hair down to her butt.
Now, how connected this is to being light-skinned is up for debate. We all know that there isn't a one-to-one-to-one correlation between having light skin, having looser hair type, and being mixed. But a question I wanted to ask but was afraid of being yelled at is: Does everyone really think there is no correlation
at all? So, for example, they now have these racial admixture tests they can do for what percentage African, Asian, and European you are (average AA is 20% Euro genes!). If they did these tests on a large sample of African-Americans, does everyone believe that if you look at a group of people who are 90% African, one that's 80% African, one that's 70% African, 60%, 50%, and so forth, that there will be no observable trend of getting lighter or having less kinky hair? Of course, even if you believe this, doesn't mean you'd want to discount anyone's experience because, just because there is a general trend for something, doesn't mean it's true of any particular individual.
okay, i'm rambling, i'll stop now.