ambergirl
Well-Known Member
I'll start with the second bolded. People were and are definitely offended by Jesus. That's why He was crucified. That's why He said the quote, and that's why many people turned away from Him in the Gospels...because they were offended by His teachings. And I mean the hard ones. I don't mean the nice ones that everyone likes. One's like "I am the way, the truth and the life; no one can come to the Father except through me." In order to still like and not be offended by Jesus, many have to either ignore words like those or make them into something they aren't. It is easy not to grapple with Jesus' teachings when some are conveniently left out or glossed over.
With respect to the first bolded, genuine atheists are a very small segment of the population. The vast majority of people do believe and have always believed in God. Polls also show that the vast majority of Americans pray often. The concept of defined "doctrine," though, offends people because it boxes everyone in. If there are 5000 ways to get to "heaven," then whatever way I feel like going is probably fine, and "heaven" is whatever I envision it to be. If someone tells me there is "one" way, then I have to conform to that one way...I do not decide for myself what is wrong and what is not wrong, I don't decide what is the best way, and I have to submit to another standard that I may not like.
Of course people have a sense of their faults. Knowing that you are not perfect is not the issue. The issue is meeting God's standards rather than one's own.
The only reason I mentioned atheists is because they're out there and they just don't believe in any supernatural force.
However, on the first bolded yes some people where offended by Jesus back in the day, but most of the people I know who question Christianity today actually resonate with a lot of Jesus' teachings. They understand that biblical scripture today reflects a long history of men editing content, just don't take them literally, and certainly don't accept the interpretations coming out of most of the churches.
I would argue that for most of us spiritual but not religious people, we believe the Bible was written by man, that Jesus was a man, that Paul was a man and therefore these texts should be interpreted that way. Some of the things in the Bible are very beautiful and ring true. Others sound like they are coming straight out of the BC and 1st century period because....they were. What we reject is this notion that just because something was said 2000 year ago and made it into a book doesn't mean it's shouldn't be questioned and subjected to discernment as you would with anything else you encounter.
For example, I like the scripture you quote here of Jesus saying he is the way. But does that mean worshiping him and following some antiquated rules from 2000 years ago? Not to me. It means follow his example, of compassion for the sick, scorned, and weak with humility and faith in the order of a Divinely inspired universe. Matter of interpretation.
I also think where folks differ is whether God has a standard and if so, what is it and who interpretes it ? For me, if there are Godly standards they are off the highest order and inspire us to be our best selves rather than giving in to pettiness and smallness. For example, I just don't believe that a Divine being capable of creating the majesty of the universe would care one whit about whether you ate meat on Friday or what type of sex you have with your partner or any of the other small minded stuff the Bible tries to say are God's standards.
That's why I just can't get with the Christian program. It's one part compassion and acceptance and four parts condemnation and judgement based on human interpretations of a book written thousands of years ago.