If the other person hasnt proven their copyright of the patent why does she have to stop?
I'm not understanding this either. Njoy's very nasty posts (I was shocked, she was always so nice on here) claimed that the other person's patent is public information, but she stopped short of providing receipts. Something still doesn't seem right.
Also, those of you still defending this ... I see you've also avoided commenting on the fact that her other website is still taking orders.
Last edited: