imaccami
New Member
I think the idea that a relaxer is so damaging is overhyped.
On the one hand, we hear that 4a/4b hair is the most fragile hair around because every kink or turning point in the hair is a point of weakness. But, a relaxer straightens out those turning points, so shouldn't the relaxed hair be at least as strong as naturally wavy 2A hair?
I'm 90% sure that a relaxer removes some bonds and replaces them with others or else it rearranges the bonds that are already there. I'm guessing that someone with a relaxer may have less bonds than they started out with, but around the same amount as someone with naturally straight or wavy hair. But, I have no idea where I got this idea from so I could've made the whole thing up.
But, my point is, I just don't think that relaxers are inherently damaging. It's the improper care, infrequent washing, tons of gel, and curling irons turned up so high that you hear a sizzle that are damaging.
On the one hand, we hear that 4a/4b hair is the most fragile hair around because every kink or turning point in the hair is a point of weakness. But, a relaxer straightens out those turning points, so shouldn't the relaxed hair be at least as strong as naturally wavy 2A hair?
I'm 90% sure that a relaxer removes some bonds and replaces them with others or else it rearranges the bonds that are already there. I'm guessing that someone with a relaxer may have less bonds than they started out with, but around the same amount as someone with naturally straight or wavy hair. But, I have no idea where I got this idea from so I could've made the whole thing up.
But, my point is, I just don't think that relaxers are inherently damaging. It's the improper care, infrequent washing, tons of gel, and curling irons turned up so high that you hear a sizzle that are damaging.