zzirvingj
New Member
I have been doing some thinking, and I was wondering...just how long would my hair have to be IN THE BACK to reach waistlenght IN THE FRONT?
For instance, I am close to being midback in the back right now. However, when pulling various sections of my hair in the front, I observe in the mirror that even the longest parts just barely stretch to my n!pple. (Couldn't think of another word or phrase to accurately describe the front length of my hair.)
I guess I could place a tape measure on my back at the bottom of my hair horizontally, and stretch it around to the front of my body to see just how many inches the hair in the front needs to "catch up" to the hair in the back. I am curious to see what the difference is.
I know that part of the problem for me is being BIG BREASTED. In other words, I have been wanting WL hair b/c I feel like that's the length that would cover my breasts (not that I'd be trying to cover my breasts with my hair every day....I just like that particular length.)
But NOW I am thinking that my hair would have to be longer than WL to do that.
Can anybody relate to what I'm saying? Does anyone have separate goals for the back of their hair versus the front??
----------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.:
(See:
http://images.askmen.com/galleries/singer/beyonce/pictures/beyonce-picture-1.jpg
for a pic that shows a length I consider to be close to "covering the breasts".)
For instance, I am close to being midback in the back right now. However, when pulling various sections of my hair in the front, I observe in the mirror that even the longest parts just barely stretch to my n!pple. (Couldn't think of another word or phrase to accurately describe the front length of my hair.)
I guess I could place a tape measure on my back at the bottom of my hair horizontally, and stretch it around to the front of my body to see just how many inches the hair in the front needs to "catch up" to the hair in the back. I am curious to see what the difference is.
I know that part of the problem for me is being BIG BREASTED. In other words, I have been wanting WL hair b/c I feel like that's the length that would cover my breasts (not that I'd be trying to cover my breasts with my hair every day....I just like that particular length.)
But NOW I am thinking that my hair would have to be longer than WL to do that.
Can anybody relate to what I'm saying? Does anyone have separate goals for the back of their hair versus the front??
----------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.:
(See:
http://images.askmen.com/galleries/singer/beyonce/pictures/beyonce-picture-1.jpg
for a pic that shows a length I consider to be close to "covering the breasts".)