cocoberry10 said:She's a member of LHCF? I didn't know that! Where are you Cathy? What's your screename?
Princess Pie said:I agree with what many of you have said. Cathy Howse is a messenger, because she challenged the status quo. She was there promoting sensible hair care, when no one else really was. She deserves credit for that.
However, she does come across as a monster. The tone of her website is unnecessarily rude and arrogant. Her inability to comment on hair products other than her own bothers me.
Also, I read her book years and obtained some growth. Then, I plateaued. My hair stayed at APL for three years. I think all of the heat was the problem. This could be why some people think her ends look bad. Although I don't think her ends look that bad. JMHO.
JCoily said:I remember reading a 20 page thread where it was a gang of 'new members' joined LHCF and only posted in a thread where somebody criticized Cathy's methods. I mean they were on the war path, and it was plenty of 'well if you woulda read the book right, then you woulda known that the product should be used xyz way.' I checked out her site, found that the tone was the same and never went back. I didn't know if one of these folks was CH, but I was really turned off by that whole situation. Hell, it was like Beyonce thread up in here.
if you use the conditioner and do all the BAD things that most uninformed black folk do to thier hair, it's not gonna benefit, but make things worse and what's the first thing black folk gonna do?? Exactly, say the conditioner took your hair out.
I agree with you, she probably didn't read the book. I was wondering if she was referring to the Dew or her own hair when she used the word "Junk".
I'm still using her technique since I started with LHCF but I decided before reading her book that I would not use heat. We can pick and choose only methods from someone's regimen (even experts) that work for us and leave the rest behind.Princess Pie said:I agree with what many of you have said. Cathy Howse is a messenger, because she challenged the status quo. She was there promoting sensible hair care, when no one else really was. She deserves credit for that.
However, she does come across as a monster. The tone of her website is unnecessarily rude and arrogant. Her inability to comment on hair products other than her own bothers me.
Also, I read her book years and obtained some growth. Then, I plateaued. My hair stayed at APL for three years. I think all of the heat was the problem. This could be why some people think her ends look bad. Although I don't think her ends look that bad. JMHO.
Mizani_Mrs said:Coco, please do tell which product did you find to be similiar to the Dew...I wouldn't mind using both to save money....
I forgot to state, i do think that her attitude is a little on the rude side. And also, i agree with the ladies who say that everything in her book is on this website, PLUS MORE. this is certainly true, but sadly it was easier to find her site/book, than to find LHCF....