Sistaslick
New Member
BackToMyRoots said:Yea. It's not like once you get married your husband's pee pee will be protected by the "force" against all "foreign soil".
Not the "force!"
BackToMyRoots said:Yea. It's not like once you get married your husband's pee pee will be protected by the "force" against all "foreign soil".
Sistaslick said:Ohh okay!
But even after all that, you're still thinkin' about going? I think I'd feel a lil odd or something sharing in their "day" especially being that homeskillet was trying to use me to ruin it.
I don't know, sounds like that wife is in for a ride with this guy.
Sistaslick said:Not the "force!"
Sistaslick said:Did you send them a nice wedding gift? I would have probably just sent them a "peace offering" on behalf of me and my SO.
If you think she's the insecure type (not like she isn't justified in that from what you've shown us of him) showing up may be the ultimate, aggressive "in your face" kinda move. Of course she might say "She's looking forward to meeting you" (that's just being cordial) but girl you know that chick is probably hoping and praying you don't actually show up. Then, "Lewis" might see it as an undercover "yes" from you and ticket to keep on trying you.
If you show up, she might think "Now, what is she doing here and why is she talking to me and schmoozing up with my inlaws?" She might not see you as harmless and trying to smooth over the waters. I just don't want your presence to backfire. Knowing how fickleminded her man is, she might see your presence as some last ditch effort to get in with the family and make her man realize what he's missed. Some women are confident enough in themselves and in their relationship to not even be phased by your presence, but I don't think this lady has the luxury.
I really think you should create some distance-- even though that won't keep their marriage from falling apart at the seams if that's the direction it's headed. It'll just be some other temptation later on for this dude. I know some ladies here would say go for it, but I *personally* just wouldn't socialize with a man who has let me know that he's willing to drop all he's got--everything he has committed himself before God to-- to give me a spin one last time.
adequate said:Please let's note for the record that there was never a spin. I never kissed him! I barely hugged him and I certainly never ever took any part of my clothing off anywhere near him.
In fact, that was one of the reasons he was so infatuated with me I think because I was a "challenge".
You make some very good points Ms. Slick. My biggest concern was just that his family might think I'm the one with the chip on my shoulder if I don't show. Sending a gift in lieu of my presence just may be the best thing. In fact, I may just call his mother and thank her for the invitation but imply that I have other long standing plans but I'll be sending a gift to her for the happy couple.
You're right. Sometimes you just have to see it from someone else's point of view and I'm glad you were so logical and didn't judge my initial decision. Correction with love is a great thing.
Distance is probably the best thing.
Thanks for your input.
Knowing I'm not obligated to go is actually a relief.
adequate said:OP, do you know this girl personally. I can't get past the feeling that someone needs to tell her or show her who she's about to marry.
Man it'd hurt but if it were me, I'd want to know.
Sistaslick said:Oh no!
I'm sorry if I implied that, A! By "spin" I meant "chance/whirl/do-over/attempt"
abenyo said:That's why when I want a guy's opinion I go to a guy.
lisana said:Distance from this man is the respectable thing. Any woman who would try to get all up in this woman's marriage has definitely got anagenda. There is no need to go anywhere near the woman to show her you are not a threat. If you want to show her, then stay away from her man. Good for you for not going to the wedding.
I agree 110% with this. Boy do I have a story to tell but got to get to class. I'll be backadequate said:Do her a favor. Set him up with someone and have her blow his trifling behind out of the water. Someone needs to warn that poor girl until it's too late. You guys are giving him too much credit. Do you really think this will be his last romp. Even if he's telling himself that, I don't buy it. He has no integrity and that won't change after the wedding.
adequate said:I may be misunderstanding the tone of your response. In case I'm misunderstanding let me clarify. I am not trying to get all up in her marriage. I have no interest in this man whatsoever. While I agree at keeping my distance, if I had chosen to go the reception for which I received an invite, I would not have had an agenda. I never have had an agenda and I never have had a romantic interest in this man. We were however, friends for 2 years prior to him ever meeting his wife. Now under these circumstances I certainly understand where you are coming from.
But do you think that means every time one of my male friends gets married I have to disown them as friends?
Where is the line to be drawn?
Obviously, some of it is common sense such as no, I'm not going to meet you for lunch if your wife doesn't know about it. No, we can't hang out and go to the movies. No, to a lot of things that would have been acceptable at one time.
Ok so when a guy friend gets married how do you perceive that the friendship needs to change?
lisana said:No, my response is pretty much my response. In MY opinion, I think for you to go, after what he did, would show that you have an agenda. If you want to convince yourself otherwise, then fine. I don't know you, so if I'm wrong, then fine, shouldn't matter to you. No, you don't have to disown every male friend that gets married. but YOU said he was coming on to you right before he was married, which means he was engaged. So maybe you can make an exception for the male friends who are engaged who come on to you. But that's just my opinion. Or just go, since you have no agenda and show the new wife who you heard is intimidated by you, that you are no threat, have no agenda and just want to share in the happiness she has with the new husband who came on to you.
*Bre~Bre* said:I don't think blossom was necessarily right. I doubt that even with the ring on his finger he will be faithful. He's a DOG erplexed
BackToMyRoots said:That's right. Marriage is not some miraculous elixir that changes people into ideal mates. Unmarried or married dogs have doggish intentions.
And how can anyone think this guy will be "true" to his wife after he's married to her?MsDee4 said:The above is a message sent to me by a dude who is ENGAGED and invited me to the wedding. Bascially asking me to find/arrange him a f-buddy for now until his wedding.
The nerve of him!!!
Goes to show some dudes don't believe in the commitment until they are married.
title edited...
lisana said:No, my response is pretty much my response. In MY opinion, I think for you to go, after what he did, would show that you have an agenda. If you want to convince yourself otherwise, then fine. I don't know you, so if I'm wrong, then fine, shouldn't matter to you. No, you don't have to disown every male friend that gets married. but YOU said he was coming on to you right before he was married, which means he was engaged. So maybe you can make an exception for the male friends who are engaged who come on to you. But that's just my opinion. Or just go, since you have no agenda and show the new wife who you heard is intimidated by you, that you are no threat, have no agenda and just want to share in the happiness she has with the new husband who came on to you.
adequate said:Actually, I did agree with what you said about THIS particular situation. I had already made up my mind after Ms. Slick's post. I guess you didn't articulate that very well.
However, I wanted to know what you thought about how to deal with a male friend in general who gets married. What do you think should change? I wonder if perhaps you thought I was being facetious when I wasn't.
But thanks for answering, either way.
lisana said:I pretty sure I was extremely articulate, but moving on. A person can do whatever they want with their life if they can live with the consequences. Now having said that, I will say that I'm sure there are many women who are friends with the married man only and not the wife and everything is kosher, I don't know any, but I have heard they exist. As a married woman, I have no time for games and I also don't have time to play the role of "bigger, better person who is cool with hubby being friends with a woman that is not a friend of mine," but if that works for some other married women, cool. IMO, anyone who has had any type of flirtation with a male friend, and then the man turns around and marries ME, then I wouldn't want them to remain friends because of the flirtation, the obvious physical attraction. But if it's all platonic, really truly platonic, then it's cool. And by platonic, I mean we all hang out together ALL the time, none of that "we'll wifey at home with the kids, so it's just you and me" Platonic = cool but flirting, attraction, me being uncomfortable = not cool. But that's just my take on this, everyone else can do it how they want to do it.
Sistaslick said:He must not have put too much $$$ into that engagement ring she's wearing.
lisana said:I pretty sure I was extremely articulate, but moving on. A person can do whatever they want with their life if they can live with the consequences. Now having said that, I will say that I'm sure there are many women who are friends with the married man only and not the wife and everything is kosher, I don't know any, but I have heard they exist. As a married woman, I have no time for games and I also don't have time to play the role of "bigger, better person who is cool with hubby being friends with a woman that is not a friend of mine," but if that works for some other married women, cool. IMO, anyone who has had any type of flirtation with a male friend, and then the man turns around and marries ME, then I wouldn't want them to remain friends because of the flirtation, the obvious physical attraction. But if it's all platonic, really truly platonic, then it's cool. And by platonic, I mean we all hang out together ALL the time, none of that "we'll wifey at home with the kids, so it's just you and me" Platonic = cool but flirting, attraction, me being uncomfortable = not cool. But that's just my take on this, everyone else can do it how they want to do it.
rondie54 said:HAHAH!
adequate said:LOL. OMG I meant to say "I" didn't articulate that very well. That was definitely a typo and I do apologize. If you'll read it again with that correction it probably makes a lot more since. Saying it the way it is now wouldn't have made very much since.
lisana said:Thank you for saying that. The internet is a trip. we all start running off at the mouth (and I do include myself , especially, when I say this) and the next thing you know it's another thread closing down. clink, clink