I like Shamboosie! He seems like the type of guy that would have you laughing from the stuff he says. Very down to earth.
He does "dis" the boards and making your own homemade hair recipes, though
Now, there were a few things he said in his book had me doing this:
He seems to have a different concept of pH from the rest of the science world. At one point in his book, he mentioned the hair's normal pH being neutral--7. We all know the hair's normal pH is actually acidic between 4.5 and 6. Then he said the pH of no lye relaxers is 18-- off the charts.
We all know the pH scale is from 0-14. He even says this himself at another point in the book.
And then I've read other sources that say no lye relaxers have a slightly lower pH than lye relaxers do--comparing supers to supers-regulars to regulars. Where 18 came from, I don't know.
Scare tactic? More than likely. He made lye relaxers sound like a pre-poo treatment or something, like they are so gentle and nourishing for your hair. Chemicals are chemicals and both are breaking your hair down. Lye relaxers are supposed to be bought and applied by professionals only for a reason. He's a stylist. Relaxing is his money maker--so I can't fault him.
Then the locking theory:
Shamboosie says that in a no-lye relaxer the disulfide bonds can’t be broken down to be straightened any further, for a corrective relaxer. Now, if this is true then he is conceding that there is also no such thing as overlapping with a no lye relaxer because the whole point of overlapping/overprocessing is that the hair weakening from the bonds breaking down further and further. If the bond arrangement is locked indefinitely into a particular arrangement after its neutralized, then at subsequent relaxings continuing to process pre-relaxed hair wouldn’t cause any harm or do anything since according him there is no more bond breakage.
Something about that just isn’t adding up :nono; We all know that if you put relaxer lye or no lye on previously relaxed hair and leave it what the outcome is going to be. Nothing nice. All relaxers destroy bonds. Another relaxer done on top of that will again destroy the remaining bonds. After a certain point the hair becomes overprocessed and dissolves. He can’t tell me bonds can’t be further broken down or (corrected & overprocessed) with a no lye as if no lye relaxed hair is an indestructible force. I can maybe buy into the “its harder to condition this hair theory†but the part on the bonds just doesn’t sit right with me. But then again, according to him Nexxus Humectress can miraculously correct this conditioning problem. Yeah. Right.[/quote]
I peeped that too
But then again after a while I was just shiming the book. I think my old stylists used to read this book. When I was reading some of the stuff, I would think about her saying it lol.
I am off to read "The Hair Bible" Not the one by Phillip/the man author, but the lady author.