I'm a bit confused by this and have been for a while now I see a lot of naturals do this.
I see posts where the member states when they got a BC (i.e. Jan 2009) and say I have been natural 2 months. BUT sometimes they started growing/stopped relaxers many months earlier (i.e. Feb 2008). So wouldn't it be less confusing to say "I have 12 months of natural growth"?
I thought you could claim being natural when you stop relaxing? I stopped relaxing June 10, 2006 but I did mini chops and did my final chop about June 2007. I wouldn't say "I've been natural for almost 2 years". The growth on my head is almost 3 years worth not almost 2. No?
Do you claim your length from your BC date or the day you stopped relaxing?
I see posts where the member states when they got a BC (i.e. Jan 2009) and say I have been natural 2 months. BUT sometimes they started growing/stopped relaxers many months earlier (i.e. Feb 2008). So wouldn't it be less confusing to say "I have 12 months of natural growth"?
I thought you could claim being natural when you stop relaxing? I stopped relaxing June 10, 2006 but I did mini chops and did my final chop about June 2007. I wouldn't say "I've been natural for almost 2 years". The growth on my head is almost 3 years worth not almost 2. No?
Do you claim your length from your BC date or the day you stopped relaxing?
Last edited: