Mrs.TheBronx
New Member
Natural = No relaxers/chemicals that alter texture -color okay
Virgin = No color, no relaxer, no chemicals
Thats what i think
Natural = No relaxers/chemicals that alter texture -color okay
Virgin = No color, no relaxer, no chemicals
So if someone has relaxed hair and they get a color than they are double processed, I have never heard anyone disagree with that.
So if you were colored and natural and then got a relaxer then you would still be double processed...
Color = processing
So if you think that you can be processed and still be natural then yes you can be colored and be natural. BTW: Plenty of people's hair texture changes with color. Mine does.
I agree with u saying that there is an emotional attachment there. i guess i see it from both sides, i dont have a yes or no answer
So is it just a chemical thing, cause what about people who are natural but press their hair until it cannot revert. is that still natural even tho no dye or chemicals were used?
Nope. The texture was altered, how can it be natural?
That's the only reason I can think of as to why black women overemphasize texture over color. *shrugs*
I would drive myself crazy with this debate because it is simply one of those things people don't want to be rational about. imo
Thats my exact point "The texture was altered, how can it be natural?" so does color alter? which in turn means not 100% natural
But see, the color altering the texture varies from woman to woman, as seen in this thread.
Relaxers always alter your texture, so I think that's why women get squirrely about whether color = not natural.
I think we all agree on the definition of virgin - no matter what you're using. I'm a hennahead, so my hair is not virgin.
When it comes to pressed permanently straight hair, that's a grey area for me - even in my own head, I'm not sure if I consider that natural, or not. The logical answer is no, but - I dunno.
See... for me altering the color is on the same level as altering the texture. If you do either one, your hair is changed on a molecular level. It's not what grew out of your scalp. There is foreign stuff in there/stuff taken out of there.
I don't get why there has to be a difference between virgin and natural hair. It's like people are so protective of the natural title, they just don't want to give it up.
but like I said, that's just me. I'm crazy so... don't listen to me
I suspect because - well, if I'm not natural (which I wouldn't be, if natural = virgin), what would my hair be considered?
Not relaxed? No, because I don't like defining thing by what they aren't.....
Natural texture, maybe, and we are just too lazy to always stick the extra word in? *lol*
Chemical Free? I use that in my siggy now, so that might work.
Yes Kiya, I like the Khemical Free.. and I spell it with a K, cause I like it like that.. LOL
Okay what about all the other shampoos and conditoners we use that are not natural? they have chemicals in them, maybe not straightening chemicals but they are not 100% fruits nuts and berries. what do u guys think on that one? THANKS!!! ya'll so sweet for helpin me..
I don't get into products, because our water has chemicals in it too, and that's just going down into absurdity, in my mind - I'm solely focusing on things that permanently change the hair/have to be cut off to be changed.
If you were 100% nuts and berries, though - I don't know. Raw hair?
thats too funny! yeah i guess u would be raw hair. so Kiya, what is your take on the flat iron altering? natural? cause it in turn can permanently straigten it if not done correctly. I went to my stylist and she was doing two-strand twist in my hair. there was another girl there getting Kinky twist,and she said to me, i remember when my hair used to curl like that, she said her hair was still natural but due to constant pressing it wont give a curl hence the kinky twist she was getting that same day. i said i would hate for that to happen to my hair. erplexed
I had bleached highlights and my texture didn't change.
REALLY?? did u still consider all of your hair to be 100% au naturalle?
Yeah... I don't get all caught up in that natural/napptural thing. Yes color is a chemical but I still considered my hair natural. I had highlights only in the front and only maybe 1/4 of my hair was dyed. So would I tell people my hair was 75% natural? And now that I cut all the blonde pieces out is my hair back to being virgin? It just doesn't make sense to me.
Gray area. Hardcore gray area. I can't, with a straight face, say that someone whose hair cannot return to it's original (from scalp) texture, is natural.
At the same time (and this links to the value associations Neith was speaking of) I feel - I dunno - bad? - about saying - Nawh, you ain't natural, either.
So, gray area. Concentration of studied illogic. I don't know.
Wait wait wait. This is possible? I didn't know that. Does that mean that the hair is damaged? I mean how much pressing what it take to do that?
I don't get into products, because our water has chemicals in it too, and that's just going down into absurdity, in my mind - I'm solely focusing on things that permanently change the hair/have to be cut off to be changed.
If you were 100% nuts and berries, though - I don't know. Raw hair?