Locks of love: we rather have the money not the hair

[Lilmama1011]

Locks Of Love Has More Than $6 Million Worth Of Donated Hair That Is Unaccounted For: Report The Huffington Post | By Eleanor Goldberg Posted: 05/14/2013 3:50 pm EDT | Updated: 05/14/2013 4:31 pm EDT 1,301 41 98 201 GET IMPACT ALERTS: SIGN UP FOLLOW: Charity , Video , Locks Of Love , Hair Donations , Locks Of Love Controversy , Locks Of Love Donations , Wig Donations , Impact News A charity that provides wigs to underprivileged children is being pressed by a nonprofit watchdog to account for $6 million in "lost locks." Locks of Love, a nonprofit that makes hairpieces for needy kids with medical issues that lead to hair loss, only produced 317 hairpieces in 2011, but should have had enough strands to produce 2,080, according to a report conducted by Nonprofit Investor (NPI). After tallying the difference and how much each hairpiece is worth, NPI concluded that the charity has more than $6 million worth of donated hair that’s unaccounted for each year. Read through the infographic for more information on NPI's findings. Story continues below. Locks of Love told NPI the number of wigs it produced, but didn’t disclose the number of hair donations it received, sold or discarded. Madonna Coffman, president of Locks of Love, made no direct mention of NPI's claims, but released the statement below in an email to The Huffington Post: “Locks of Love” has for over 15 years and will continue to create the highest quality custom prosthesis for each applicant. This process cannot be initiated or carried out prior to the request and participation of the applicant who completes a mold process, chooses the density, color, length and style of their prosthesis. Our recipients include those with the autoimmune disorder alopecia areata, cancer survivors, burn and trauma victims and any other condition that may result in long term hair loss. To our knowledge we are the only organization that provides a vacuum fitted, custom prosthesis, as opposed to “wigs” that can be mass produced and inventoried until needed. Our commitment to provide a new prosthesis every 2 years until the age of 21 has given these children back the opportunity to do everything other kids do and not be ostracized or bullied again. While we’ve reached this, our initial goal, we’ve made an additional promise to them to be the catalyst to finding a treatment and cure for alopecia areata by providing research funds to date of 2.2 million dollars. We greatly appreciate and applaud our supporters who have helped us make thousands of dreams come true. Back in 2007, the nonprofit told The New York Times that about 80 percent of the hair donated is discarded because people are unaware of the guidelines and often send strands that are that too short, processed or gray. The organization sends the best donations it gets to Taylormade Hair Replacement in Millbrae, Calif., which then weeds through the hair even further. The business crafts the wigs and sells them to Locks of Love for less than $1,000. While NPI is calling on the nonprofit to become more transparent and is accusing the Locks of Love of not producing an adequate amount of hairpieces, some say that the report’s calculations aren’t entirely accurate. A commenter on Reddit noted that the NPI might be overstating the worth of the tresses that make up the wigs. The report states that the hair in each piece is equitable to $3,750. The commenter remarked that that steep price might just apply to the finished product, once the hairpiece has already been manufactured. “The author seems to have confused retail/wholesale costs,” REInvestor wrote. “You can imagine how much labor would have to go into making a realistic, attractive head piece versus the likely low cost of hair.” Nonprofit Investor responded, saying that its figures are accurate since they simply deducted $1,000, the amount the nonprofit pays for the wigs, from the amount Locks of Love values each hairpiece. While Locks of Love continues to stand by its mission, it’s admitted that sorting through the mounds of unusable hair is an arduous task and that it would much prefer to get money from supporters. “A check would be easier for me,” Coffman, told The New York Times. “But would the donors get out of it what they do? No.”

If you want the actual site than ....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/locks-of-love-controversy_n_3269078.html

 

[koolkittychick]

Yeah, I knew about this scam from a long time ago. Plus, even though they say they take African American hair, I doubt they use any donated, actual type 4 virgin hair, as it shrinks too much to work with in the wig making process, and they definitely do not use relaxed hair, as it's too fragile to go through the process of being made into a wig. So even if you have good intentions, it is pretty much a waste of your time and hair to donate to Locks of Love if you are African American with type 4 hair.

 

[MileHighDiva]

Wow! I wonder if they're going to use Shameless Maya's hair, or if they'll throw it out for being too curly?

According to the comments on the Huff Post, people who are altruistic and want to donate their hair should donate to the Pantene program (don't recall the name) or Wigs for Kids, in lieu of, Locks for Love.

I would be suspicious that Pantene/Proctor & Gamble was doing product testing on the donated hair, instead of making custom made wigs for people in need. Especially, if they got their hands on some healthy Afro-textured hair, after reading Chicoro's book Hair Products 101.

 

[koolkittychick]

Wow! I wonder if they're going to use Shameless Maya's hair, or if they'll throw it out for being too curly?

According to the comments on the Huff Post, people who are altruistic and want to donate their hair should donate to the Pantene program (don't recall the name) or Wigs for Kids, in lieu of, Locks for Love.

I would be suspicious that Pantene/Proctor & Gamble was doing product testing on the donated hair, instead of making custom made wigs for people in need. Especially, if they got their hands on some healthy Afro-textured hair, after reading @Chicoro's book Hair Products 101.

I would agree with you on that. Based on the little bit of research I did on the subject. most of the hair industry (wig makers, purveyors of weave hair et al) does not want to work with African American hair (type 3c or tighter) because it does not stand up to the process from raw hair to finished product (washing, sorting, wefting and/or wig creation) because of shrinkage, tangles and lack of uniformity from batch to batch. It is easier for them to take type 1 or 2 hair and process it to look like 3c or 4 hair than to actually work with authentic 3c or 4 hair. So unless Shameless Maya's hair is a loose 3a, her hair probably ended up in the trash or in a lab somewhere having the latest curly pudding concoction slathered all over it.

 

[Jewell]

Yeah I saw this on Twitter the day the story broke, 2 days ago. Forbes had the article up. Im glad I didnt donate the 12 inches I cut off back in 2007. Back then I saw that they werent accepting chemically processed hair. So I just kept my ponytail. I wont be giving them any $ either with that $6mil amiss in donations to consider. Shame on them. If, God forbid, I ever had to chop my hair off again (did it for style purposes back then), I will donate it to the local Duke University Wig Shop for cancer patients. Now those ppl do good work.

 

[My Friend]

I have been trying to get this across for YEARS!!!! ****SCREAMS*****


LOCKS of LOVE does not give FREE wigs to ANYONE who does NOT have a condition that causes permanent hair loss. The majority of cancer patients hair loss is temporary NOT permanent. They SELL those wigs. Once a patient finds out how much the wig cost plus all the paperwork, they normally end up going to the BSS near them.

Most people don't realize what really goes on with locks of love.

Thank you, thank you, thank you.....***exhales***

 

[Seamonster]

Clutches pearls